Literature DB >> 25856269

Pulmonary Embolism Response to Fragmentation, Embolectomy, and Catheter Thrombolysis (PERFECT): Initial Results From a Prospective Multicenter Registry.

William T Kuo1, Arjun Banerjee2, Paul S Kim3, Frank J DeMarco4, Jason R Levy5, Francis R Facchini6, Kamil Unver2, Matthew J Bertini6, Akhilesh K Sista7, Michael J Hall8, Jarrett K Rosenberg2, Miguel A De Gregorio9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) carries up to a 20% risk of major bleeding, including a 2% to 5% risk of hemorrhagic stroke. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of catheter-directed therapy (CDT) as an alternative treatment of acute PE.
METHODS: One hundred one consecutive patients receiving CDT for acute PE were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter registry. Massive PE (n = 28) and submassive PE (n = 73) were treated with immediate catheter-directed mechanical or pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and/or catheter-directed thrombolysis through low-dose hourly drug infusion with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or urokinase. Clinical success was defined as meeting all the following criteria: stabilization of hemodynamics; improvement in pulmonary hypertension, right-sided heart strain, or both; and survival to hospital discharge. Primary safety outcomes were major procedure-related complications and major bleeding events.
RESULTS: Fifty-three men and 48 women (average age, 60 years [range, 22-86 years]; mean BMI, 31.03 ± 7.20 kg/m2) were included in the study. The average thrombolytic doses were 28.0 ± 11 mg tPA (n = 76) and 2,697,101 ± 936,287 International Units for urokinase (n = 23). Clinical success was achieved in 24 of 28 patients with massive PE (85.7%; 95% CI, 67.3%-96.0%) and 71 of 73 patients with submassive PE (97.3%; 95% CI, 90.5%-99.7%). The mean pulmonary artery pressure improved from 51.17 ± 14.06 to 37.23 ± 15.81 mm Hg (n = 92) (P < .0001). Among patients monitored with follow-up echocardiography, 57 of 64 (89.1%; 95% CI, 78.8%-95.5%; P < .0001) showed improvement in right-sided heart strain. There were no major procedure-related complications, major hemorrhages, or hemorrhagic strokes.
CONCLUSIONS: CDT improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute PE while minimizing the risk of major bleeding. At experienced centers, CDT is a safe and effective treatment of both acute massive and submassive PE. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01097928; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25856269     DOI: 10.1378/chest.15-0119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  90 in total

Review 1.  Achieving Multidisciplinary Collaboration for the Creation of a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: Creating a "Team of Rivals".

Authors:  Christopher Kabrhel
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Catheter-Directed Interventions for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The Jury Is Still Out.

Authors:  Nathan L Liang; Rabih A Chaer; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Catheter directed thrombolytic therapy and aspiration thrombectomy in intermediate pulmonary embolism with long term results.

Authors:  Zoltan Ruzsa; Zoltan Vámosi; Balázs Berta; Balázs Nemes; Károly Tóth; Nándor Kovács; Endre Zima; Dávid Becker; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 4.  Pulmonary Embolism: The Astute Interventional Radiology Clinician.

Authors:  Akhilesh K Sista
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Comparative Outcomes of Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis and Standard Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Nathan L Liang; Efthymios D Avgerinos; Luke K Marone; Michael J Singh; Michel S Makaroun; Rabih A Chaer
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.089

6.  Systemic thrombolysis increases hemorrhagic stroke risk without survival benefit compared with catheter-directed intervention for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Nathan L Liang; Efthymios D Avgerinos; Michael J Singh; Michel S Makaroun; Rabih A Chaer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2017-01-16

7.  Midterm outcomes of catheter-directed interventions for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Nathan L Liang; Rabih A Chaer; Luke K Marone; Michael J Singh; Michel S Makaroun; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 1.285

8.  Catheter Interventions for Pulmonary Embolism: Are They Really that Safe?

Authors:  Adham N Abou Ali; Nathan L Liang; Rabih A Chaer; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  Role of Interventional Radiologist in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  William Bremer; Charles E Ray; Ketan Y Shah
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 10.  Rationale for catheter directed therapy in pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Sailen G Naidu; Martha-Gracia Knuttinen; J Scott Kriegshauser; William G Eversman; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.