| Literature DB >> 32139972 |
William Bremer1, Charles E Ray2, Ketan Y Shah2.
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism is a common cause of morbidity and mortality which continues to increase in overall incidence. Because it can occur with a wide range of clinical presentations, different guidelines have been developed for appropriate risk stratification of patients; interventional radiology plays a vital role in the management of both massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. Catheter-directed therapy, including mechanical and aspiration thrombectomy, standard catheter-directed thrombolysis, and ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis, has many benefits, including lower thrombolytic doses and intraclot administration of thrombolytic therapy. While the role of catheter-directed therapy is still being developed, four important prospective studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy. Additional studies comparing short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with catheter-directed therapy versus anticoagulation are the next step in understanding its role within the management of submassive pulmonary embolism. Furthermore, multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams, in which interventional radiology plays a crucial role, are becoming essential to appropriately managing pulmonary embolism patients, including selection of those who may benefit from catheter-directed therapy. © Thieme Medical Publishers.Entities:
Keywords: catheter-directed therapy; catheter-directed thrombolysis; interventional radiology; pulmonary embolism; pulmonary embolism response team; submassive pulmonary embolism
Year: 2020 PMID: 32139972 PMCID: PMC7056338 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol ISSN: 0739-9529 Impact factor: 1.513