David J Lederer1, Williamson Z Bradford2, Elizabeth A Fagan2, Ian Glaspole3, Marilyn K Glassberg4, Kenneth F Glasscock2, David Kardatzke5, Talmadge E King6, Lisa H Lancaster7, Steven D Nathan8, Carlos A Pereira9, Steven A Sahn10, Jeffrey J Swigris11, Paul W Noble12. 1. Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY. 2. InterMune, Inc, Brisbane, CA. 3. Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 4. University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL. 5. InterMune, Inc, Brisbane, CA. Electronic address: davidlederer@columbia.edu. 6. University of California, San Francisco, CA. 7. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 8. Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA. 9. Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 10. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 11. National Jewish Health, Denver, CO. 12. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: FVC outcomes in clinical trials on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can be substantially influenced by the analytic methodology and the handling of missing data. We conducted a series of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the statistical finding and the stability of the estimate of the magnitude of treatment effect on the primary end point of FVC change in a phase 3 trial evaluating pirfenidone in adults with IPF. METHODS: Source data included all 555 study participants randomized to treatment with pirfenidone or placebo in the Assessment of Pirfenidone to Confirm Efficacy and Safety in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (ASCEND) study. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess whether alternative statistical tests and methods for handling missing data influenced the observed magnitude of treatment effect on the primary end point of change from baseline to week 52 in FVC. RESULTS: The distribution of FVC change at week 52 was systematically different between the two treatment groups and favored pirfenidone in each analysis. The method used to impute missing data due to death had a marked effect on the magnitude of change in FVC in both treatment groups; however, the magnitude of treatment benefit was generally consistent on a relative basis, with an approximate 50% reduction in FVC decline observed in the pirfenidone group in each analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the robustness of the statistical finding on the primary end point of change in FVC in the ASCEND trial and corroborate the estimated magnitude of the pirfenidone treatment effect in patients with IPF. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01366209; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: FVC outcomes in clinical trials on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can be substantially influenced by the analytic methodology and the handling of missing data. We conducted a series of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the statistical finding and the stability of the estimate of the magnitude of treatment effect on the primary end point of FVC change in a phase 3 trial evaluating pirfenidone in adults with IPF. METHODS: Source data included all 555 study participants randomized to treatment with pirfenidone or placebo in the Assessment of Pirfenidone to Confirm Efficacy and Safety in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (ASCEND) study. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess whether alternative statistical tests and methods for handling missing data influenced the observed magnitude of treatment effect on the primary end point of change from baseline to week 52 in FVC. RESULTS: The distribution of FVC change at week 52 was systematically different between the two treatment groups and favored pirfenidone in each analysis. The method used to impute missing data due to death had a marked effect on the magnitude of change in FVC in both treatment groups; however, the magnitude of treatment benefit was generally consistent on a relative basis, with an approximate 50% reduction in FVC decline observed in the pirfenidone group in each analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the robustness of the statistical finding on the primary end point of change in FVC in the ASCEND trial and corroborate the estimated magnitude of the pirfenidone treatment effect in patients with IPF. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01366209; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Authors: Harold R Collard; Talmadge E King; Becki Bucher Bartelson; Jason S Vourlekis; Marvin I Schwarz; Kevin K Brown Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-05-28 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: C J Zappala; P I Latsi; A G Nicholson; T V Colby; D Cramer; E A Renzoni; D M Hansell; R M du Bois; A U Wells Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2009-10-19 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Roland M du Bois; Derek Weycker; Carlo Albera; Williamson Z Bradford; Ulrich Costabel; Alex Kartashov; Lisa Lancaster; Paul W Noble; Ganesh Raghu; Steven A Sahn; Javier Szwarcberg; Michiel Thomeer; Dominique Valeyre; Talmadge E King Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Paul W Noble; Carlo Albera; Williamson Z Bradford; Ulrich Costabel; Marilyn K Glassberg; David Kardatzke; Talmadge E King; Lisa Lancaster; Steven A Sahn; Javier Szwarcberg; Dominique Valeyre; Roland M du Bois Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Talmadge E King; Sharon Safrin; Karen M Starko; Kevin K Brown; Paul W Noble; Ganesh Raghu; David A Schwartz Journal: Chest Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: H Taniguchi; M Ebina; Y Kondoh; T Ogura; A Azuma; M Suga; Y Taguchi; H Takahashi; K Nakata; A Sato; M Takeuchi; G Raghu; S Kudoh; T Nukiwa Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Yangjin Jegal; Dong Soon Kim; Tae Sun Shim; Chae-Man Lim; Sang Do Lee; Younsuck Koh; Woo Sung Kim; Won Dong Kim; Jin Seong Lee; William D Travis; Masanori Kitaichi; Thomas V Colby Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-01-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kevin R Flaherty; Jeanette A Mumford; Susan Murray; Ella A Kazerooni; Barry H Gross; Thomas V Colby; William D Travis; Andrew Flint; Galen B Toews; Joseph P Lynch; Fernando J Martinez Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-05-28 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Shannon H Lacy; Amali P Epa; Stephen J Pollock; Collynn F Woeller; Thomas H Thatcher; Richard P Phipps; Patricia J Sime Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Steven D Nathan; Lisa H Lancaster; Carlo Albera; Marilyn K Glassberg; Jeffrey J Swigris; Frank Gilberg; Klaus-Uwe Kirchgaessler; Susan L Limb; Ute Petzinger; Paul W Noble Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2018-08-02
Authors: Toby M Maher; Michael Kreuter; David J Lederer; Kevin K Brown; Wim Wuyts; Nadia Verbruggen; Simone Stutvoet; Ann Fieuw; Paul Ford; Walid Abi-Saab; Marlies Wijsenbeek Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2019-05-21
Authors: Marilyn K Glassberg; Steven D Nathan; Chin-Yu Lin; Elizabeth A Morgenthien; John L Stauffer; Willis Chou; Paul W Noble Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Hayley C Warsinske; Amanda K Wheaton; Kevin K Kim; Jennifer J Linderman; Bethany B Moore; Denise E Kirschner Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: K Griffiths; D M Habiel; J Jaffar; U Binder; W G Darby; C G Hosking; A Skerra; G P Westall; C M Hogaboam; M Foley Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 4.379