BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating disease, yet validated, reliable criteria for evaluating patient response to therapies in clinical trials are lacking. METHODS: To optimize selection of end point criteria for the study of interferon (IFN)-gamma1b in patients with IPF, we retrospectively analyzed the components of the primary efficacy end point used in a large, controlled study of 330 patients for reliability, validity, and sensitivity to treatment effect. The primary end point components were death, disease progression defined as a > or = 5 mm Hg increase in resting alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient (P[A-a]O2), and disease progression defined as a > or = 10% decrease in percentage of predicted FVC. RESULTS: We found that the P(A-a)O2 criterion was not reliable and was not associated with mortality. In contrast, the FVC criterion was reliable and was associated with a 2.4-fold increase in the risk of death. Of the three measures, only mortality was sensitive to a treatment effect of IFN-gamma1b. Additionally, the tendency for mortality benefit was observed in nearly all patient subgroups defined by baseline physiology. The effect of IFN-gamma1b on mortality was strongest in patients with baseline percentage of predicted FVC > or = 55% (p = 0.004) or percentage of predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide > or = 30% (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: We conclude that mortality is the most inclusive end point for future trials of IFN- gamma1b in patients with IPF, and that a > 10% decrement in the percentage of predicted FVC represents a valid measure of disease progression.
BACKGROUND:Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating disease, yet validated, reliable criteria for evaluating patient response to therapies in clinical trials are lacking. METHODS: To optimize selection of end point criteria for the study of interferon (IFN)-gamma1b in patients with IPF, we retrospectively analyzed the components of the primary efficacy end point used in a large, controlled study of 330 patients for reliability, validity, and sensitivity to treatment effect. The primary end point components were death, disease progression defined as a > or = 5 mm Hg increase in resting alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient (P[A-a]O2), and disease progression defined as a > or = 10% decrease in percentage of predicted FVC. RESULTS: We found that the P(A-a)O2 criterion was not reliable and was not associated with mortality. In contrast, the FVC criterion was reliable and was associated with a 2.4-fold increase in the risk of death. Of the three measures, only mortality was sensitive to a treatment effect of IFN-gamma1b. Additionally, the tendency for mortality benefit was observed in nearly all patient subgroups defined by baseline physiology. The effect of IFN-gamma1b on mortality was strongest in patients with baseline percentage of predicted FVC > or = 55% (p = 0.004) or percentage of predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide > or = 30% (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: We conclude that mortality is the most inclusive end point for future trials of IFN- gamma1b in patients with IPF, and that a > 10% decrement in the percentage of predicted FVC represents a valid measure of disease progression.
Authors: Carlyne D Cool; Steve D Groshong; Pradeep R Rai; Peter M Henson; J Scott Stewart; Kevin K Brown Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ganesh Raghu; Harold R Collard; Jim J Egan; Fernando J Martinez; Juergen Behr; Kevin K Brown; Thomas V Colby; Jean-François Cordier; Kevin R Flaherty; Joseph A Lasky; David A Lynch; Jay H Ryu; Jeffrey J Swigris; Athol U Wells; Julio Ancochea; Demosthenes Bouros; Carlos Carvalho; Ulrich Costabel; Masahito Ebina; David M Hansell; Takeshi Johkoh; Dong Soon Kim; Talmadge E King; Yasuhiro Kondoh; Jeffrey Myers; Nestor L Müller; Andrew G Nicholson; Luca Richeldi; Moisés Selman; Rosalind F Dudden; Barbara S Griss; Shandra L Protzko; Holger J Schünemann Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Matthew R Lammi; Robert P Baughman; Surinder S Birring; Anne-Marie Russell; Jay H Ryu; Marybeth Scholand; Oliver Distler; Daphne LeSage; Catherine Sarver; Katerina Antoniou; Kristin B Highland; Otylia Kowal-Bielecka; Joseph A Lasky; Athol U Wells; Lesley Ann Saketkoo Journal: Curr Respir Med Rev Date: 2015
Authors: David J Lederer; Williamson Z Bradford; Elizabeth A Fagan; Ian Glaspole; Marilyn K Glassberg; Kenneth F Glasscock; David Kardatzke; Talmadge E King; Lisa H Lancaster; Steven D Nathan; Carlos A Pereira; Steven A Sahn; Jeffrey J Swigris; Paul W Noble Journal: Chest Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Charlene D Fell; Lyrica Xiaohong Liu; Caroline Motika; Ella A Kazerooni; Barry H Gross; William D Travis; Thomas V Colby; Susan Murray; Galen B Toews; Fernando J Martinez; Kevin R Flaherty Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Shelley L Schmidt; Nabihah Tayob; Meilan K Han; Christopher Zappala; Dolly Kervitsky; Susan Murray; Athol U Wells; Kevin K Brown; Fernando J Martinez; Kevin R Flaherty Journal: Chest Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Brent W Kinder; Cyrus Shariat; Harold R Collard; Laura L Koth; Paul J Wolters; Jeffrey A Golden; Ralph J Panos; Talmadge E King Journal: Lung Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.584