Literature DB >> 25855474

Clinical outcome of stand-alone ALIF compared to posterior instrumentation for degenerative disc disease: A pilot study and a literature review.

Peter M Udby1, Rachid Bech-Azeddine2.   

Abstract

The objective of the article was to: a) present results from a case cohort pilot study comparing stand-alone ALIF and TLIF and, b) review the literature on studies comparing the clinical outcome of stand-alone ALIF with posterior instrumentation including TLIF or PLIF, in patients with disabling low back pain resulting from degenerative disc disease. ALIF surgery has previously been linked with certain high risk complications and unfavorable long term fusion results. Newer studies suggest that stand-alone ALIF can possibly be advantageous compared to other types of posterior instrumented interbody fusion for a selected group of DDD patients. The methods and material consisted of a cohort pilot study of patients, with DDD treated with stand-alone ALIF or TLIF followed by a literature review conducted through a comprehensive PubMed database search of the English literature. Studies comparing stand-alone ALIF with posterior instrumented interbody fusion were selected and reviewed. Results from the pilot study, n = 21, showed a reduced perioperative blood loss, shorter operative time and a trend towards better pain reduction and decreased use of opioid analgesics in patients undergoing stand-alone ALIF compared to posterior instrumented fusion with TLIF. The literature review included three studies, n = 630. All three studies were retrospective cohort studies. The average patient follow-up was 2-years but with heterogeneous selected outcomes. Two of three articles documented significant advantages when using stand-alone ALIF on outcomes such as ODI, VAS, surgical time, blood loss and patient satisfaction. No study found stand-alone ALIF inferior in chosen outcomes including fusion. In conclusion the pilot study and the literature review, finds similar clinical outcomes and fusion rates after stand-alone ALIF and posterior interbody fusion. Stand-alone ALIF was associated with a shorter duration of surgery, less perioperative blood loss and a faster improvement post-operatively. Therefore stand-alone ALIF is a viable and important surgical option, which could be considered first choice as surgical treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF; DDD; Fusion; LBP; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25855474     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  9 in total

Review 1.  Bowel injury in lumbar spine surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ioannis Siasios; Kunal Vakharia; Asham Khan; Joshua E Meyers; Samantha Yavorek; John Pollina; Vassilios Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

2.  Outpatient Versus Inpatient Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Multisite, Comparative Analysis of Patient Safety Measures.

Authors:  Jason M Cuellar; Edward Nomoto; Ehsan Saadat; Anthony Ma; Patrick Hill; Michael Kropf; Todd H Lanman; Brian Perri; Khawar Siddique; Willis Wagner; Rajeev Rao; Albert Wong; Michael Eng; Stephen Stephan; Neel Anand; Hyun Bae; Alexandre Rasouli
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

3.  Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Interspinous Process Fixation: Outcomes from a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Ripul Panchal; Ryan Denhaese; Clint Hill; K Brandon Strenge; Alexandre DE Moura; Peter Passias; Paul Arnold; Andrew Cappuccino; M David Dennis; Andy Kranenburg; Brieta Ventimiglia; Kim Martin; Chris Ferry; Sarah Martineck; Camille Moore; Kee Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

4.  Implications of sagittal alignment and complication profile with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior posterior lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Seth Ahlquist; Rachel Thommen; Howard Y Park; William Sheppard; Kevin James; Elizabeth Lord; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

5.  Iatrogenic Bowel Injury Following Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Analysis of 3 Cases.

Authors:  Tarush Rustagi; Emre Yilmaz; Fernando Alonso; Cameron Schmidt; Rod Oskouian; R Shane Tubbs; Jens R Chapman; Sarah Hopkins; Thomas A Schildhauer; Christian Fisahn
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-11-20

6.  Efficacy and radiographic analysis of oblique lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Menghui Wu; Jia Li; Mengxin Zhang; Xufeng Ding; Dongxu Qi; Guimiao Li; Yong Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Anterior Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Perioperative Risk Factors and 30-Day Outcomes.

Authors:  Pavan S Upadhyayula; Erik I Curtis; John K Yue; Nikki Sidhu; Joseph D Ciacci
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-10-15

8.  The Association of MRI Findings and Long-Term Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Peter Muhareb Udby; Søren Ohrt-Nissen; Tom Bendix; Stig Brorson; Leah Y Carreon; Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-12

9.  Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion - complications and perioperative results.

Authors:  Rodrigo Amaral; Ronaldo Ferreira; Luis Marchi; Rubens Jensen; Joes Nogueira-Neto; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-09-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.