| Literature DB >> 25854418 |
Michael Taylor Hensley1, James de Andrade1, Bruce Keene2, Kathryn Meurs2,3, Junnan Tang1,4, Zegen Wang5, Thomas G Caranasos6, Jorge Piedrahita1,3, Tao-Sheng Li7, Ke Cheng1,3,5,8.
Abstract
The regenerative potential of cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) for ischaemic heart disease has been demonstrated in mice, rats, pigs and a recently completed clinical trial. The regenerative potential of CDCs from dog hearts has yet to be tested. Here, we show that canine CDCs can be produced from adult dog hearts. These cells display similar phenotypes in comparison to previously studied CDCs derived from rodents and human beings. Canine CDCs can differentiate into cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells in vitro. In addition, conditioned media from canine CDCs promote angiogenesis but inhibit cardiomyocyte death. In a doxorubicin-induced mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), intravenous infusion of canine CDCs improves cardiac function and decreases cardiac fibrosis. Histology revealed that injected canine CDCs engraft in the mouse heart and increase capillary density. Out study demonstrates the regenerative potential of canine CDCs in a mouse model of DCM.Entities:
Keywords: cardiosphere-derived cells; dilated cardiomyopathy; dogs; stem cell therapy
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25854418 PMCID: PMC4549031 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Derivation and culture of Canine CDCs. (A) Schematic diagram showing the derivation of canine CDC. (B) Outgrowth cells from plated myocardial tissues. (C) Cardiospheres forming in suspension culture. (D and E) Cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs). (F) Cumulative growth analysis on population doublings of canine CDCs. (G) Clonal growth assay showing the progenies of a single canine CDCs at Day 1, 5 and 10. (H) Expressions of CD105, CD90, ckit, CD45 by flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry in canine. MSC data (Fig. S2); scale bars = 50 μm in all images.
Figure 2Cardiovascular differentiation of canine CDCs in vitro. (A) Representative fluorescent micrographs showing the expressions of aSA, aSMA and vWF in canine CDCs and MSCs r in three differentiation conditions: CM diff: cardiomyocyte differentiation; SM diff: smooth muscle differentiation; EC diff: endothelial cell differentiation. (B) Percentages of total cells that are positive for specific differentiation markers. * indicates P < 0.05 when compared to cMSC; scale bars = 50 μm.
Figure 3Paracrine assay. (A) Representative fluorescent micrographs showing neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCM) grown in plain IMDM, condition media from canine MSC and condition media from canine CDC. Myocyte area were measured by NIH Image J software (n = 23). * indicates P < 0.05 when compared to MSC-CM or IMDM. (B) Representative fluorescent micrographs showing NRCMs grown in: plain media, condition media from canine MSC, condition media from canine CDC. Apoptotic cells were detected by TUNEL staining and quantified (n = 18). * indicates P < 0.05 when compared to cMSC CM or IMDM. (C) Measurement of average tube length in HUVEC cells cultured on Matrigel and incubated in conditioned media form canine CDCs or MSCs (n = 13). * indicates P < 0.05 when compared to cMSC CM; scale bars = 50 μm.
Figure 4Cardiac function and fibrosis. (A) Schematic diagram showing the design of animal studies. (B) Representative Masson’s Trichrome staining images and quantification of fibrotic area (n = 3) Whole section view (Fig. S3A). (C and D) Change in ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) form baseline measurements (n = 9–11 animals per group); scale bars = 100 μm. *indicates P < 0.05 when compared to the Dox + saline treatment.
Figure 5Canine CDC engraftment, pro-angiogenic effects, apoptosis measurement. (A) Representative micrographs showing the engraftment of DiI-positive CDCs in the DCM mouse heart. (B) Representative micrographs showing vWF-positive vasculatures. (C) Quantification of vWF-positive vasculatures (n = 9–14 animals per group). (D) Representative micrographs showing apoptosis. (E) Quantitation of cell apoptosis (n = 6). * indicates P < 0.05 when compared to Dox + Saline treatment; scale bars = 50 μm.