| Literature DB >> 28524367 |
Zegen Wang1, Ningzheng Dong1,2, Yayan Niu1, Zhiwei Zhang1, Ce Zhang1, Meng Liu1, Tiantian Zhou1, Qingyu Wu1,3, Ke Cheng1,4,5.
Abstract
Over the past decade, cell therapies have provided promising strategies for the treatment of ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Particularly, the beneficial effects of stem cells, including bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), have been demonstrated by substantial preclinical and clinical studies. Nevertheless stem cell therapy is not always safe and effective. Hence, there is an urgent need for alternative sources of cells to promote cardiac regeneration. Human villous trophoblasts (HVTs) play key roles in embryonic implantation and placentation. In this study, we show that HVTs can promote tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) on Matrigel and enhance the resistance of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCMs) to oxidative stress in vitro. Delivery of HVTs to ischaemic area of heart preserved cardiac function and reduced fibrosis in a mouse model of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Histological analysis revealed that transplantation of HVTs promoted angiogenesis in AMI mouse hearts. In addition, our data indicate that HVTs exert their therapeutic benefit through paracrine mechanisms. Meanwhile, injection of HVTs to mouse hearts did not elicit severe immune response. Taken together, our study demonstrates HVT may be used as a source for cell therapy or a tool to study cell-derived soluble factors for AMI treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Human villous trophoblasts; cell therapy; myocardial infarction; paracrine effects
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28524367 PMCID: PMC5618685 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Characterization of HVTs. (A) Morphology of HVTs in trophoblast medium (TM) after 24 hrs. (B) Transcription of RNAs by RT‐PCR in HVTs. (C, D) Protein expression of HVTs by immunofluorescence or Western blotting. HEK293 cell lysate is a positive control in D.
Figure 2Paracrine assays, HUVEC tube formation and NRCM apoptosis in HVT‐CM. (A) Representative antibody array images showing the proteins present in HVT‐CM and control TM. Abbreviations: CM, conditioned media; TM: trophoblast medium; CXCL5, C‐X‐C motif chemokine 5; GRO: growth‐regulated protein; IL8: interleukin‐8; CCL2: C‐C motif chemokine 2; TIMP‐1: Metalloproteinase inhibitor 1; TIMP‐2: Metalloproteinase inhibitor 2; ANGPT‐1: Angiopoietin‐1; ANFPT‐: Angiopoietin‐2; MMP‐1: Interstitial collagenase; uPAR: Urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor. (B) Representative tube formation by HUVECs on Matrigel incubated with HVT‐CM or control DMEM (n = 12–14). (C) Representative confocal images showing NRCMs exposed to 100 μM H2O2 for 24 hrs in HVT‐CM or control IMDM. Apoptotic cells were detected by TUNEL staining and quantified (n = 5). ***indicates P<0.001 when HVT group compared to PBS. Data are presented as mean ± S.D.
Figure 3Cardiac function and fibrosis. (A) Schematic diagram showing the animal procedures. (B) Representative echocardiography images at 4 weeks after treatment. The pericardium and endocardium are outlined with yellow and red dotted lines, respectively. LVVd, left ventricular volume in diastole; LVVs, left ventricular volume in systole. (C) Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by echocardiography at baseline (left) and 4 weeks afterwards (right) in PBS or HVT groups (n = 7–9 mice per group). Baseline LVEFs were indistinguishable between the two groups. (D) Representative Masson's trichrome‐stained images and quantification of fibrotic area of the infarcted myocardium 4 weeks after treatments (n = 4 mice per group). Scar tissue and viable myocardium are identified by the blue and red colours, respectively. Snapshots of the infarct border zone (black box area) are presented beneath each group. **indicates P<0.01 when HVT group compared to PBS., ***indicates P<0.001 when HVT group compared to PBS. Data are presented as mean ± S.D.
Figure 4Reduced apoptosis and increased angiogenesis. (A) Microscopy images of TUNEL staining in heart sections of HVT‐ or PBS‐treated mice 8 hrs after MI. Apoptotic cells (red colour) are highlighted with white arrowheads. (B) Quantitation of apoptotic cells (n = 4). (C) Representative micrographs showing vWF‐stained vasculatures in the PBS and HVT groups 4 weeks after treatment. (D) Quantification of vWF‐stained vasculatures (n = 3 mice per group). ***indicates P<0.001 when HVT group compared to PBS. Data are presented as mean ± S.D.
Figure 5Cell retention and immune response in heart tissues. (A) Representative confocal images showing the cell retention of HVTs (positive for human nuclei antigen (HNA); green, indicated by white arrows) in the infarct border zone. (B) Representative confocal images showing CD8‐positive cells in the infarct border zone. (C) Quantification of CD8‐positive cells in the infarct border zone. ns indicated there was no significant difference when HVT group compared to PBS. Data are presented as mean ± S.D.