Literature DB >> 25854170

Diagnostic accuracy of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuan-Lan Huang1, Jie Chen, Wei Yan, Ding Zang, Qin Qin, An-Mei Deng.   

Abstract

Previous studies have evaluated the accuracy of serum and urinary measurements of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) for the diagnosis of bladder cancer; however, the results have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall accuracy of CYFRA 21-1 for the diagnosis of bladder cancer. We performed a search for English-language publications reporting on the detection of CYFRA21-1 levels for the diagnosis of bladder cancer through November 2, 2014, using public medical databases, including EMBASE, Web of Science, and Medline. The quality of the studies was assessed by revised QUADAS tools. The performance characteristics were pooled and analyzed using a bivariate model. Publication bias was explored with the Deek's test. Sixteen studies, with a total 1,262 bladder-cancer patients and 1,233 non-bladder-cancer patients, were included in the study. The pooled sensitivities for serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 were 0.42 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.51) and 0.82 (95 % CI, 0.70-0.90), respectively. The corresponding specificities were 0.94 (95 % CI, 0.90-0.96) and 0.80 (95 % CI, 0.73-0.86), respectively. The areas under the summary receiver-operating-characteristic curves for serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 were 0.88 (95 % CI, 0.85-0.91) and 0.87 (95 % CI, 0.84-0.90), respectively. The major design deficiencies of the included studies were participant-selection bias, potential review, and verification bias. Therefore, we concluded that both serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 served as efficient indexes for bladder-cancer diagnosis. Additional, well-designed studies should be performed to rigorously evaluate the diagnostic value of CYFRA 21-1 for bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25854170     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3352-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  34 in total

1.  Analytical and prospective evaluation of urinary cytokeratin 19 fragment in bladder cancer.

Authors:  J L Pariente; L Bordenave; F Jacob; A Gobinet; F Leger; J M Ferriere; M Le Guillou
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  CYFRA 21-1 quantity measurement in the urine of patients with carcinoma of the urinary bladder and tract.

Authors:  C M Schambeck; P Stieber; N Schmeller; K Hofmann; H Pahl; A Fateh-Moghadam
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 4.  Systematic reviews of studies quantifying the accuracy of diagnostic tests and markers.

Authors:  Johannes B Reitsma; Karel G M Moons; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Kristian Linnet
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian Burger; James W F Catto; Guido Dalbagni; H Barton Grossman; Harry Herr; Pierre Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Carlo La Vecchia; Shahrokh Shariat; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) in bladder cancer.

Authors:  T Morita; T Kikuchi; S Hashimoto; Y Kobayashi; A Tokue
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  The clinical value of CYFRA21-1 in bladder cancer patients: Egyptian experience.

Authors:  O el-Ahmady; A B Halim; A G el-Din
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  Clinical evaluation of soluble cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1) in serum and urine of patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Y Senga; G Kimura; T Hattori; K Yoshida
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  Cytokeratin markers come of age.

Authors:  Stig Linder
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2007-08-23

10.  Cytokeratins as serum markers in egyptian bladder cancer. A comparison of CYFRA 21-1, TPA and TPS.

Authors:  E A Mady
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.248

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  [Urinary marker-old wine in new bottles?]

Authors:  K Fischer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Emerging Roles of Urine-Based Tumor DNA Analysis in Bladder Cancer Management.

Authors:  Aadel A Chaudhuri; Bruna Pellini; Nadja Pejovic; Pradeep S Chauhan; Peter K Harris; Jeffrey J Szymanski; Zachary L Smith; Vivek K Arora
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 3.  Advances in Diagnosis and Therapy for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Xinzi Hu; Guangzhi Li; Song Wu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Cytokeratin-19 fragment in the diagnosis of bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Xu-Guang Guo; Jia-Jie Long
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 5.  The contemporary role and impact of urine-based biomarkers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Igor Duquesne; Lars Weisbach; Atiqullah Aziz; Luis A Kluth; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  Trends in urine biomarker discovery for urothelial bladder cancer: DNA, RNA, or protein?

Authors:  Nada Humayun-Zakaria; Douglas G Ward; Roland Arnold; Richard T Bryan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

Review 7.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential of Biomarkers CYFRA 21.1, ERCC1, p53, FGFR3 and TATI in Bladder Cancers.

Authors:  Milena Matuszczak; Maciej Salagierski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer: A Current Need for Patient Diagnosis and Monitoring.

Authors:  Iris Lodewijk; Marta Dueñas; Carolina Rubio; Ester Munera-Maravilla; Cristina Segovia; Alejandra Bernardini; Alicia Teijeira; Jesús M Paramio; Cristian Suárez-Cabrera
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Reference limits for chromogranin A, CYFRA 21-1, CA 125, CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Gustav Mikkelsen; Arne Åsberg; Maria E Hultström; Knut Aasarød; Gunhild G Hov
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 10.  Extralobar pulmonary sequestration with elevated serum neuron-specific enolase: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Feng-Wei Kong; Wei-Min Wang; Longbo Gong; Wenbin Wu; Miao Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.