Le-Le Li1, Yi Lu1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Abstract
We report a novel strategy for regiospecific hetero-assembly of DNA-modified gold nanoparticles (DNA-AuNPs) onto upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) into hybrid lab-on-a-particle systems. The DNA-AuNPs have been assembled onto the hexagonal plate-like UCNPs with well-regulated stoichiometry and controlled organization onto the different facets of UCNP, forming various addressable superstructures. The fine-tuning of stoichiometry and organization is realized by biorecognition specificity of DNA toward specific crystal facets of UCNPs. Such a hetero-assembled DNA-AuNP/UCNP system maintains both plasmonic resonance of AuNPs and fluorescent properties of UCNPs, allowing targeted dual-modality imaging of cancer cells using an aptamer.
We report a novel strategy for regiospecific hetero-assembly of DNA-modified gold nanoparticles (DNA-AuNPs) onto upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) into hybrid lab-on-a-particle systems. The DNA-AuNPs have been assembled onto the hexagonal plate-like UCNPs with well-regulated stoichiometry and controlled organization onto the different facets of UCNP, forming various addressable superstructures. The fine-tuning of stoichiometry and organization is realized by biorecognition specificity of DNA toward specific crystal facets of UCNPs. Such a hetero-assembled DNA-AuNP/UCNP system maintains both plasmonic resonance of AuNPs and fluorescent properties of UCNPs, allowing targeted dual-modality imaging of cancer cells using an aptamer.
Nanoparticles (NPs) with excellent
controlled size, shape, composition, and geometry-dependent properties
have been well developed in the past decade. Discrete assembling these
NPs into well-defined superstructure is a major focus of current nanoscale
science and engineering, as it holds promises for both fundamental
investigation of NP–NP interactions and practical applications
in areas such as optoelectronics and medicine.[1] However, rationally controlling the self-assembly from the “bottom-up”
while maintaining precise control over the stoichiometry and spatial
organization of the NPs at nanometer scale represents a major challenge
in this area.[1] Recently, DNA has attracted
great attention as an ideal programmable assembly agent for controllable
self-assembly of NPs into well-defined superstructures, because of
the high programmability.[2] However, the
method was mainly applied to assembly of the same type of nanomaterial
building blocks such as gold nanoparticles (AuNPs),[3] quantum dots,[4] and carbon nanotubes.[5] Despite much effort to explore hetero-assembly
of different types of NPs (e.g., QDs and AuNPs) into controllable
hybrid superstructures,[6] a significant
gap remains in the ability to achieve strict control over the organization
of two or more kinds of NPs into spatially addressable configurations,
which often requires controlling of the “valency” of
the NPs (i.e., the number of DNA molecules on the surface of NPs),
and the process is time- and cost-consuming and lacks high yields.[4,6]
Schematic Illustrations of the Hetero-Assembly of Lab-on-a-Particle
Superstructures
(a) Forming
side assemblies with low ratio of
DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP. (b) Forming top assemblies through incubation
Lipo-UCNP with DNA molecules first and then assembly with DNA-AuNPs.
(c) Forming satellite assemblies with high ratio of DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP.Among the various types of potential NP building
blocks, lanthanide-doped
upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) is becoming an exciting candidate,
because of their unique optical properties (emitting tunable shorter-wavelength
luminescence under near-infrared excitation) and diverse applications
such as medical imaging, therapeutics, and photovoltaics.[7] Although some efforts have been made to construct
UCNPs-based multifunctional materials through direct attachment of
other types of NPs or core–shell fabrication,[8] the primary hurdle in assembling UCNPs-based superstructures
is to control the composition and binding sites on its surface because
they are normally capped with hydrophobic ligands that lacks any functional
groups for surface modification. Herein, we report for the first time
a new strategy for hetero-assembly of UCNPs and AuNPs into controlled
sophisticated superstructures (Scheme 1). Compared
with previously reported DNA-mediated NPs assembly based on sequence-specific
base pairing, our present strategy relies on the controlled anisotropic
surface property of UCNP and its facet-selected binding with DNA molecules.
By deliberately controlling the biorecognition specificity of DNA
toward specific crystal facets of upconversion nanoplates and the
ratios of Au-to-UCNPs, the AuNPs could be selectively assembled onto
the different facets of a hexagonal UCNP. Such hybrid nanostructures
with both plasmonic and upconversion luminescent properties enable
dual-modal cell imaging.
Scheme 1
Schematic Illustrations of the Hetero-Assembly of Lab-on-a-Particle
Superstructures
(a) Forming
side assemblies with low ratio of
DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP. (b) Forming top assemblies through incubation
Lipo-UCNP with DNA molecules first and then assembly with DNA-AuNPs.
(c) Forming satellite assemblies with high ratio of DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP.
TEM images of the (a–c) as-prepared and
(d–f) DNA-AuNPs/UCNP
side assemblies, which stand on the TEM grids on either the bottom
or side face. Scale bar = 50 nm.The hetero-assembly involves two essential building blocks:
DNA-modified
AuNPs and water-soluble UCNPs. DNA-modified 5 nm AuNPs (DNA-AuNPs)
were prepared using a well-established method based on the thiol adsorption
on gold surface.[9] Oleic acid-capped hexagonal-phase
NaYF4:18%Yb/2%Er UCNPs were synthesized according to the
literature methods,[10] which were then transferred
into water-soluble ones based on a phospholipids (DSPE-PEG) coating
(Lipo-UCNPs), as reported previously.[7j] As shown in Figures 1a–c and S1, the Lipo-UCNPs used for the assembly display
uniform hexagonal plate-like shape with a flat hexagonal top surface
(edge length of ∼50 nm) and six rectangular side surfaces (∼50
× 55 nm), standing on the TEM grids on either the bottom face
or the side face. In a typical hetero-assembly process, a small volume
of concentrated DNA-AuNPs solution was added into the buffer solution
of Lipo-UCNPs with a final DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNPs molar ratio of
26:1. This mixture was then kept at room temperature for more than
2 h with shaking. The resulted DNA-AuNPs/UCNP assemblies were collected
by centrifugation, washed with water to remove unassembled DNA-AuNPs,
and then characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
As shown in Figures 1d–f and S1, the discrete DNA-AuNPs/UCNP assemblies could
be directly formed in high yields (92%). Interestingly, the DNA-AuNPs
were found to locate exclusively on the six adjacent side faces of
the Lipo-UCNP, and few DNA-AuNPs were found on the hexagonal top surfaces
of the Lipo-UCNP. These results clearly demonstrated formation of
anisotropic plasmonic upconversion superassemblies. Such assembly
could be performed in solutions of different pH values or salt concentrations
(Figure S2). Furthermore, DNA of other
sequences (e.g., T27, C27, and G20) could be used by the same method
to obtain superassemblies (Figure S3).
Figure 1
TEM images of the (a–c) as-prepared and
(d–f) DNA-AuNPs/UCNP
side assemblies, which stand on the TEM grids on either the bottom
or side face. Scale bar = 50 nm.
To optimize the conditions under which the anisotropic nanostructures
were obtained, we systematically varied the ratio of the two types
of NPs. At a molar ratio of DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP (10:1), the asymmetric
assemblies formed with DNA-AuNPs occurred on the six side faces of
Lipo-UCNP (Figures 2b–d and S4). When the ratio was increased to 26:1, more
DNA-AuNPs were attached on the side faces of Lipo-UCNPs (Figures 1d–f and S1). When
the ratio was further increased to 60:1, the side faces of Lipo-UCNP
were almost fully covered with DNA-AuNPs, and the DNA-AuNPs were observed
starting to assembly on top faces of Lipo-UCNPs (Figures 2e–g and S4). When
the ratio further reaches 200:1, the planet-satellite analogues with
DNA-AuNPs attached homogeneously on all the eight faces of Lipo-UCNPs
can be observed (Figures 2h–j and S4). The formed superstructures were further
confirmed by UV–vis absorption. When the ratio was increased,
the color of dispersed assemblies changed from colorless to light-
and dark-red (Figure 2k), as a result of the
characteristic SPR absorption of nanostructured gold along with the
formation of discrete assemblies. Indeed, the UV–vis absorption
spectra of the resulted assemblies revealed that the SPR band of the
superstructures at 520 nm simultaneously increased when the ratio
of DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNPs was varied from low to high values (Figure 2l).
Figure 2
(a) Schematics of the hetero-assembly of DNA-AuNPs/UCNP
superstructures
with increased NPs ratio of DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP. TEM images of
the DNA-AuNPs/UCNP assemblies produced from the NPs molar ratio of
DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNPs of (b–d) 10:1, (e–g) 60:1, and
(h–j) 200:1. (k) Photographs and (l) UV–vis absorption
spectra of the DNA-AuNPs/UCNP superstructures assembled from different
NPs ratio of DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP. Scale bar = 50 nm.
(a) Schematics of the hetero-assembly of DNA-AuNPs/UCNP
superstructures
with increased NPs ratio of DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP. TEM images of
the DNA-AuNPs/UCNP assemblies produced from the NPs molar ratio of
DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNPs of (b–d) 10:1, (e–g) 60:1, and
(h–j) 200:1. (k) Photographs and (l) UV–vis absorption
spectra of the DNA-AuNPs/UCNP superstructures assembled from different
NPs ratio of DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP. Scale bar = 50 nm.Organic surfactants that show preferential adsorption
to certain
crystal facets have been extensively explored to manipulate NP shapes.[11] Recently, it is found that some biomolecules
show specific recognition toward specific materials and a particular
crystal facet.[12,13] We explore the self-assembly
of DNA-AuNPs on selected faces of a single UCNP based on the recognition
of DNA toward specific facets of UCNPs. DNA has shown strong binding
affinity for lanthanide ions due to an abundance of negatively charged
backbone.[14] We have recently demonstrated
that DNA molecules show a strong binding on UCNPs surface based on
this interfacial interaction.[7k] For the
current system, the binding of DNA with UCNPs was further confirmed
by incubation of a FAM dye-labeled DNA with Lipo-UCNPs. After 12 h
of incubation, both of the fluorescences from the FAM and UCNPs, respectively,
were visualized from the purified nanoparticles (Figure S5). As a control, we also performed assembly using
PEG-modified AuNPs to investigate the effect of DNA. Without DNA modification
on AuNPs, no attachment of the two kinds of nanoparticles was observed
(Figure S6). Another control experiment
using DSPE-PEG coated iron oxide NPs indicated a negligible binding
with DNA-AuNPs (Figure S7), suggesting
that there was little nonspecific binding of DNA-AuNPs to the phospholipids
layer. These results confirm that the DNA binding to UCNPs surface
is critical in driving the hetero-assembly of DNA-AuNPs and Lipo-UCNPs.
Also, it is known that the hexagonal plate-like β-NaYF4 possesses typical crystal planes of top (001) and equivalent six
prismatic side planes of (100) families. During the crystal growth,
oleic acid (OA) interacted more strongly with (001) facets than (100)
facets, resulting in the formation of hexagonal nanoplates with much
higher OA ligands coverage on (001) planes.[10a] Control experiments using OA-free UCNPs resulted in the binding
with DNA-AuNPs without facet selectivity (Figure
S8). Therefore, the controlled anisotropic surface property
of UCNP and its face-selected binding of DNA are key factors in the
formation of such superassemblies. At low DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP ratio,
DNAs on the AuNPs prefer to bind to the equivalent six prismatic side
facets of UCNPs, because this facet has less OA capping ligands and
thus more exposed Ln3+ on these planes. With gradually
increasing DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNP ratio, the coverage of DNA-AuNPs
on the six prismatic side faces began to saturate, then the DNA-AuNPs
began to assemble on the top faces of UCNPs, forming planet-satellite
analogues. As a control, incubating DNA-AuNPs with the superstructure
(Figure 2e–g) with a DNA-AuNPs to the
superstructure ratio of 26:1 resulted in more AuNPs being assembled
on top faces of the UCNPs (Figure S9),
confirming that high concentration of DNA-AuNPs could lead to more
chance for assembling on the top faces.(a) Schematic illustration
of hetero-assembly of DNA-AuNPs/UCNP
top assemblies. (b–d) TEM images of DNA-AuNPs/UCNP top assemblies.
Scale bar = 50 nm.Considering different
geometries for the assembly of AuNPs around
a UCNP, there are three basic options: AuNPs can be assembled only
to the top (001) facets, the sides (100) facets, and both top and
side faces of UCNPs. These three types of superstructures are designated
as top, side, and satellite assemblies, respectively. Having demonstrated
the controlled preparation of side (Figure 1d–f) and satellite (Figure 2h–j)
assemblies, we then explored the controlled assembly of top superstructure
based on the DNA mediation. When the UCNPs are incubated with free
DNA molecules (A27, 5 μM) first and then with DNA-AuNPs, the
side faces of the UCNPs were blocked with DNA molecules, while DNA-AuNPs
may only attach on the top faces (Figure 3a).
As expected, the top assemblies were produced with high yield based
on this design with a DNA-AuNPs to Lipo-UCNPs ratio of 30:1 (Figures 3b–d and S10).
The DNA-AuNPs were found to locate on the hexagonal top surfaces of
Lip-UCNPs, while there are few DNA-AuNPs observed on the six side
faces of Lip-UCNPs. The formation of top assemblies not only further
confirmed the DNA-facet directed self-assembly mechanism but also
highlight the power of the strategy for controlled tuning the assembly
of AuNPs and UCNPs.
Figure 3
(a) Schematic illustration
of hetero-assembly of DNA-AuNPs/UCNP
top assemblies. (b–d) TEM images of DNA-AuNPs/UCNP top assemblies.
Scale bar = 50 nm.
Targeted dual-modality imaging of cancer cells with the
hetero-assemblies.
Confocal microscopy images of 4T1 cells treated with (a) DNA aptamer
and (b) control DNA functionalized satellite assemblies. Fluorescence
emission was collected in the range of 520–560 nm with the
excitation of NIR light (980 nm).We then investigated the versatility of our method in assembling
of DNA-AuNPs and UCNPs with different particle sizes. The assembly
was carried out through a process similar to that used for preparing
the sample shown in Figure 1, except that the
13, 20, and 30 nm AuNPs were used. As shown in Figure S11, the hetero-assemblies made of differently
sized AuNPs could be easily obtained with high yields (>88%). Furthermore,
the UCNPs used can also be independently varied to form the superstructure
(Figure S12). Moreover, since DNA is exposed
on the AuNPs of the superstructures and can be readily hybridized
to complementary DNA (cDNA), the obtained superstructures can further
be used to realize more complex designs. As a demonstration of this
feature, 20 nm AuNPs modified with cDNA was assembled with satellite
assemblies to form ternary NPs superstructure (94% yield) (Figure S13).Combining plasmonic materials such
as gold with fluorescent materials
such as quantum dots has been of great interest due to their diverse
applications, such as in bioimaging.[6,15] We therefore
investigate the optical properties of the DNA-AuNPs/UCNP assemblies.
Interestingly, as shown in Figure S14,
minimal AuNPs-induced luminescence quenching was observed for the
superstructures. The results suggest that the nanoassemblies may act
as excellent dual-modality imaging probes because of their combined
plasmon scattering property of AuNPs and upconversion fluorescent
property of UCNPs. Furthermore, the strategy produces a prescribed
superstructure with an addressable polyvalent DNA coating, which may
display biorecognition ability and hence enable sensitive targeted
bioimaging. We first investigated their ability to enter live cells
by incubation of satellite assemblies with HeLa cells for 12 h. The
resulting HeLa cells exhibited bright NIR-light responsive upconverted
fluorescence within the cytoplasm (Figure S15), suggesting that the assemblies are capable of crossing cell membranes
without the need of transfection agents. We then explored the use
of DNA aptamer functionalized satellite assemblies for targeted dual-modality
imaging of cancer cells. A 26-mer DNA aptamer AS1411 that is capable
of targeting nucleolin was conjugated to satellite assemblies for
targeted imaging of the nucleolin-overexpressed breast cancer cell
line 4T1. As shown in Figure 4, the cells treated
with the aptamer-functionalized satellite assemblies showed both strong
upconversion fluorescence and light scattering signals. The near complete
overlap of the two imaging signals further confirms the cellular uptake
of the hetero-assemblies. In comparison, the satellite assemblies
modified with control DNA (A27) showed much less binding to the 4T1
cells, confirming the targeting role of the specific aptamer.
Figure 4
Targeted dual-modality imaging of cancer cells with the
hetero-assemblies.
Confocal microscopy images of 4T1 cells treated with (a) DNA aptamer
and (b) control DNA functionalized satellite assemblies. Fluorescence
emission was collected in the range of 520–560 nm with the
excitation of NIR light (980 nm).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated regiospecific assembly of plasmonic
upconversion hetero-superstructures based on DNA–inorganic
interfacial interactions. Such multifunctional superassemblies not
only offer plasmonic and upconversion optical properties but also
enable a polyvalent DNA surface, which may find wide applications
in bioimaging, nanomedicine, and photovoltaics.
Authors: Robert J Macfarlane; Byeongdu Lee; Matthew R Jones; Nadine Harris; George C Schatz; Chad A Mirkin Journal: Science Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Grigory Tikhomirov; Sjoerd Hoogland; P E Lee; Armin Fischer; Edward H Sargent; Shana O Kelley Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2011-07-10 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Sang Hwan Nam; Yun Mi Bae; Yong Il Park; Jeong Hyun Kim; Hyung Min Kim; Joon Sig Choi; Kang Taek Lee; Taeghwan Hyeon; Yung Doug Suh Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Yu Shi; Bingyang Shi; Arun V Everest Dass; Yiqing Lu; Nima Sayyadi; Liisa Kautto; Robert D Willows; Roger Chung; James Piper; Helena Nevalainen; Bradley Walsh; Dayong Jin; Nicolle H Packer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 4.379