| Literature DB >> 25852161 |
Yuting Liang, Liyou Wu1, Ian M Clark2, Kai Xue1, Yunfeng Yang3, Joy D Van Nostrand1, Ye Deng1, Zhili He1, Steve McGrath2, Jonathan Storkey2, Penny R Hirsch2, Bo Sun4, Jizhong Zhou5.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Spatial scaling is a critical issue in ecology, but how anthropogenic activities like fertilization affect spatial scaling is poorly understood, especially for microbial communities. Here, we determined the effects of long-term fertilization on the spatial scaling of microbial functional diversity and its relationships to plant diversity in the 150-year-old Park Grass Experiment, the oldest continuous grassland experiment in the world. Nested samples were taken from plots with contrasting inorganic fertilization regimes, and community DNAs were analyzed using the GeoChip-based functional gene array. The slopes of microbial gene-area relationships (GARs) and plant species-area relationships (SARs) were estimated in a plot receiving nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) and a control plot without fertilization. Our results indicated that long-term inorganic fertilization significantly increased both microbial GARs and plant SARs. Microbial spatial turnover rates (i.e., z values) were less than 0.1 and were significantly higher in the fertilized plot (0.0583) than in the control plot (0.0449) (P < 0.0001). The z values also varied significantly with different functional genes involved in carbon (C), N, P, and sulfur (S) cycling and with various phylogenetic groups (archaea, bacteria, and fungi). Similarly, the plant SARs increased significantly (P < 0.0001), from 0.225 in the control plot to 0.419 in the fertilized plot. Soil fertilization, plant diversity, and spatial distance had roughly equal contributions in shaping the microbial functional community structure, while soil geochemical variables contributed less. These results indicated that long-term agricultural practice could alter the spatial scaling of microbial biodiversity. IMPORTANCE: Determining the spatial scaling of microbial biodiversity and its response to human activities is important but challenging in microbial ecology. Most studies to date are based on different sites that may not be truly comparable or on short-term perturbations, and hence, the results observed could represent transient responses. This study examined the spatial patterns of microbial communities in response to different fertilization regimes at the Rothamsted Research Experimental Station, which has become an invaluable resource for ecologists, environmentalists, and soil scientists. The current study is the first showing that long-term fertilization has dramatic impacts on the spatial scaling of microbial communities. By identifying the spatial patterns in response to long-term fertilization and their underlying mechanisms, this study makes fundamental contributions to predictive understanding of microbial biogeography.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25852161 PMCID: PMC4453543 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00240-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1 Microbial gene-area relationship (A) and plant species-area relationship (B) in a long-term fertilized plot and a control plot of the Park Grass Experiment.
The slopes of gene-area relationships for various functional and phylogenetic groups under control or long-term fertilization
| Control (12D plot) | N fertilization (11/2C plot) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% C.I. | 95% C.I. | |||||||||||
| All functional genes | 0.0449 | 1.47 × 10−3 | 4006 | −60.21 | <0.001 | 0.0583 | 2.10 × 10−3 | 3405 | −54.59 | <0.001 | 10.22 | 0.0001 |
| Functional groups | ||||||||||||
| C degradation | 0.0588 | 1.90 × 10−3 | 432 | −59.87 | <0.001 | 0.0630 | 2.26 × 10−3 | 414 | −53.5 | <0.001 | 2.78 | 0.0053 |
| C fixation | 0.0421 | 1.36 × 10−3 | 141 | −58.7 | <0.001 | 0.0754 | 2.52 × 10−3 | 129 | −57.77 | <0.001 | 22.80 | 0.0001 |
| N fixation | 0.410 | 1.38 × 10−3 | 174 | −58.95 | <0.001 | 0.0365 | 1.36 × 10−3 | 151 | −52.5 | <0.001 | 4.54 | 0.0001 |
| Assimilatory N reduction | 0.0660 | 2.18 × 10−3 | 34 | −58.73 | <0.001 | 0.0582 | 2.23 × 10−3 | 29 | −51.71 | <0.001 | 4.90 | 0.0001 |
| Dissimilatory N reduction | 0.0599 | 1.94 × 10−3 | 28 | −57.59 | <0.001 | 0.0592 | 2.29 × 10−3 | 25 | −51.08 | <0.001 | 0.45 | 0.6479 |
| Nitrification | 0.0671 | 2.91 × 10−3 | 14 | −45.42 | <0.001 | 0.0842 | 2.86 × 10−3 | 7 | −56.99 | <0.001 | 8.21 | 0.0001 |
| Denitrification | 0.0543 | 1.81 × 10−3 | 190 | −58.93 | <0.001 | 0.0613 | 2.21 × 10−3 | 148 | −54.73 | <0.001 | 4.81 | 0.0001 |
| Phosphorus | 0.0234 | 8.02 × 10−4 | 76 | −55.08 | <0.001 | 0.0609 | 2.18 × 10−3 | 56 | −57.55 | <0.001 | 31.71 | 0.0001 |
| Sulfur | 0.0367 | 1.22 × 10−3 | 193 | −58.82 | <0.001 | 0.0724 | 2.56 × 10−3 | 176 | −54.44 | <0.001 | 24.65 | 0.0001 |
| Phylogenetic groups | ||||||||||||
| Archaea | 0.0428 | 1.42 × 10−3 | 94 | −58.68 | <0.001 | 0.0492 | 1.72 × 10−3 | 79 | −55.57 | <0.001 | 5.60 | 0.0001 |
| Fungi | 0.0604 | 2.02 × 10−3 | 182 | −58.93 | <0.001 | 0.0704 | 2.61 × 10−3 | 153 | −54.13 | <0.001 | 5.93 | 0.0001 |
| Bacteria | 0.0444 | 1.47 × 10−3 | 3191 | −58.03 | <0.001 | 0.0565 | 2.04 × 10−3 | 2705 | −53.7 | <0.001 | 9.43 | 0.0001 |
| Gram-positive | 0.0263 | 8.79 × 10−4 | 539 | −59.6 | <0.001 | 0.0347 | 1.25 × 10−3 | 496 | −53.28 | <0.001 | 10.75 | 0.0001 |
| Gram-negative | 0.0254 | 8.54 × 10−4 | 1998 | −59.3 | <0.001 | 0.0312 | 1.12 × 10−3 | 1656 | −54.93 | <0.001 | 8.05 | 0.0001 |
| α-Proteobacteria | 0.0356 | 1.20 × 10−3 | 763 | −59.71 | <0.001 | 0.0567 | 2.02 × 10−3 | 661 | −54.92 | <0.001 | 17.58 | 0.0001 |
| β-Proteobacteria | 0.0437 | 1.45 × 10−3 | 429 | −60.84 | <0.001 | 0.0557 | 2.07 × 10−3 | 356 | −54.61 | <0.001 | 9.30 | 0.0001 |
| γ-Proteobacteria | 0.0496 | 1.65 × 10−3 | 522 | −58.56 | <0.001 | 0.0528 | 1.89 × 10−3 | 399 | −53.76 | <0.001 | 2.50 | 0.0123 |
| δ-Proteobacteria | 0.0619 | 2.03 × 10−3 | 144 | −59.35 | <0.001 | 0.0583 | 2.13 × 10−3 | 126 | −54.88 | <0.001 | 2.39 | 0.0165 |
The z values of functional groups and phylogenetic groups are significantly different from all functional genes (P < 0.05) in control plot.
The z values of functional groups and phylogenetic groups are significantly different from all functional genes (P < 0.05) in fertilized plot.
The right-most columns test whether the z values for the two treatments were significantly different.
Correlation analysis between microbial functional gene and soil geochemical variables, plant, and distance by partial Mantel test
| Fertilization | Soil | Plant | Distance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All functional genes | 0.138 | 0.198 | 0.181 | 0.165 | ||||
| Functional groups | ||||||||
| C degradation | 0.119 | 0.200 | 0.163 | 0.153 | ||||
| C fixation | 0.158 | 0.250 | 0.201 | 0.208 | ||||
| Assimilatory N reduction | 0.043 | 0.172 | 0.098 | 0.071 | 0.043 | 0.17 | 0.0502 | 0.066 |
| Dissimilatory N reduction | 0.090 | 0.145 | 0.165 | 0.108 | ||||
| Nitrification | 0.015 | 0.362 | 0.045 | 0.275 | 0.100 | 0.067 | ||
| Denitrification | 0.088 | 0.111 | 0.051 | 0.169 | 0.124 | |||
| N fixation | 0.156 | 0.202 | 0.185 | 0.174 | ||||
| Phosphorus | 0.115 | 0.119 | 0.141 | 0.145 | ||||
| Sulfur | 0.166 | 0.232 | 0.189 | 0.199 | ||||
The significant values (P ≤ 0.05) are indicated in boldface.
FIG 2 Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of GeoChip hybridization signal intensities and environmental variables that were significantly related to microbial variation. Subsets of soil variables, distance, and plant diversity were selected for analysis on the basis of variance in inflation factors. Distance was represented by eight primary variables from principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM), and the first two were used for CCA. Triangles represent 12D sample data (control), and circles represent 11/2C sample data (fertilization). Colors from dark to bright represent samples from the center to the periphery. The relationship was significant (P = 0.005).
FIG 3 Variation partitioning analysis (VPA) of microbial distribution patterns explained by soil geochemical properties (S), fertilization (F), spatial distance (D), and plant diversity (P). Each diagram represents the biological variation partitioned into the relative effects of each factor or a combination of factors. Distance is represented by eight primary variables from principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM) analysis. Soil geochemical properties included soil pH and moisture. Fertilization was quantified by total nitrogen and ammonium.
FIG 4 A comparison of z values of macroorganism and microbial taxonomic groups. Data were obtained from supplemental data of Drakare et al. (1) except for groups that are less defined taxonomically. Some recent data for microbial communities were also included. A total of 806 datasets were analyzed. Error bars show standard deviations.