Literature DB >> 25851589

Impacts of the Minamata convention on mercury emissions and global deposition from coal-fired power generation in Asia.

Amanda Giang1, Leah C Stokes2,3, David G Streets4, Elizabeth S Corbitt5, Noelle E Selin1,6.   

Abstract

We explore implications of the United Nations Minamata Convention on Mercury for emissions from Asian coal-fired power generation, and resulting changes to deposition worldwide by 2050. We use engineering analysis, document analysis, and interviews to construct plausible technology scenarios consistent with the Convention. We translate these scenarios into emissions projections for 2050, and use the GEOS-Chem model to calculate global mercury deposition. Where technology requirements in the Convention are flexibly defined, under a global energy and development scenario that relies heavily on coal, we project ∼90 and 150 Mg·y(-1) of avoided power sector emissions for China and India, respectively, in 2050, compared to a scenario in which only current technologies are used. Benefits of this avoided emissions growth are primarily captured regionally, with projected changes in annual average gross deposition over China and India ∼2 and 13 μg·m(-2) lower, respectively, than the current technology case. Stricter, but technologically feasible, mercury control requirements in both countries could lead to a combined additional 170 Mg·y(-1) avoided emissions. Assuming only current technologies but a global transition away from coal avoids 6% and 36% more emissions than this strict technology scenario under heavy coal use for China and India, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851589     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions.

Authors:  Yanxu Zhang; Daniel J Jacob; Hannah M Horowitz; Long Chen; Helen M Amos; David P Krabbenhoft; Franz Slemr; Vincent L St Louis; Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Benefits of mercury controls for the United States.

Authors:  Amanda Giang; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Global and Local Impacts of Delayed Mercury Mitigation Efforts.

Authors:  Hélène Angot; Nicholas Hoffman; Amanda Giang; Colin P Thackray; Ashley N Hendricks; Noel R Urban; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Global Sources and Pathways of Mercury in the Context of Human Health.

Authors:  Kyrre Sundseth; Jozef M Pacyna; Elisabeth G Pacyna; Nicola Pirrone; Rebecca J Thorne
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Alcohol solvothermal reduction for commercial P25 to harvest weak visible light and fabrication of the resulting floating photocatalytic spheres.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Yao Li; Jia-Hao Pan; Yan-Ling Zhang; Li-Guang Wu; Chun-Ying Dong; Chun-Juan Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sounding the Alarm: Health in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Colin D Butler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Linking science and policy to support the implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury.

Authors:  Henrik Selin; Susan Egan Keane; Shuxiao Wang; Noelle E Selin; Kenneth Davis; Dominique Bally
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 8.  A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Jane L Kirk; Lei Zhang; Elsie M Sunderland; Martin Jiskra; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Vertical Distribution of Total Mercury and Mercury Methylation in a Landfill Site in Japan.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Masaki Takaoka; Akira Sano; Akito Matsuyama; Ryuji Yanase
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.