Literature DB >> 25850863

The Use of Pediatric Ventricular Assist Devices in Children's Hospitals From 2000 to 2010: Morbidity, Mortality, and Hospital Charges.

Robert T Mansfield1, Kimberly Y Lin, Theoklis Zaoutis, Antonio R Mott, Zeinab Mohamad, Xianqun Luan, Beth D Kaufman, Chitra Ravishankar, J William Gaynor, Robert E Shaddy, Joseph W Rossano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of ventricular assist devices has increased dramatically in adult heart failure patients. However, the overall use, outcome, comorbidities, and resource utilization of ventricular assist devices in pediatric patients have not been well described. We sought to demonstrate that the use of ventricular assist devices in pediatric patients has increased over time and that mortality has decreased.
DESIGN: A retrospective study of the Pediatric Health Information System database was performed for patients 20 years old or younger undergoing ventricular assist device placement from 2000 to 2010.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-five pediatric patients were implanted with ventricular assist devices during the study period: 69 in 2000-2003 (era 1), 135 in 2004-2006 (era 2), and 271 in 2007-2010 (era 3). Median age at ventricular assist device implantation was 6.0 years (interquartile range, 0.5-13.8), and the proportion of children who were 1-12 years old increased from 29% in era 1 to 47% in era 3 (p = 0.002). The majority of patients had a diagnosis of cardiomyopathy; this increased from 52% in era 1 to 72% in era 3 (p = 0.003). Comorbidities included arrhythmias (48%), pulmonary hypertension (16%), acute renal failure (34%), cerebrovascular disease (28%), and sepsis/systemic inflammatory response syndrome (34%). Two hundred forty-seven patients (52%) underwent heart transplantation and 327 (69%) survived to hospital discharge. Hospital mortality decreased from 42% in era 1 to 25% in era 3 (p = 0.004). Median hospital length of stay increased (37 d [interquartile range, 12-64 d] in era 1 vs 69 d [interquartile range, 35-130] in era 3; p < 0.001) and median adjusted hospital charges increased ($630,630 [interquartile range, $227,052-$853,318] in era 1 vs $1,577,983 [interquartile range, $874,463-$2,280,435] in era 3; p < 0.001). Factors associated with increased mortality include age less than 1 year (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.01-3.83), acute renal failure (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.26-3.65), cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.25-3.62), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (odds ratio, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.79-5.60). Ventricular assist device placement in era 3 (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.15-0.57) and a diagnosis of cardiomyopathy (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.32-0.84), were associated with decreased mortality. Large-volume centers had lower mortality (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.88), lower use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and higher charges.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of ventricular assist devices and survival after ventricular assist device placement in pediatric patients have increased over time, with a concomitant increase in resource utilization. Age under 1 year, certain noncardiac morbidities, and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are associated with worse outcomes. Lower mortality was seen at larger volume ventricular assist device centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25850863     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  7 in total

1.  Epidemiology of Pediatric Heart Failure in the USA-a 15-Year Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Marc Anders; Susan Denfield; Raysa Morales-Demori; Elena Montañes; Gwen Erkonen; Michael Chance
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Influence of Transplant Center Procedural Volume on Survival Outcomes of Heart Transplantation for Children Bridged with Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Alex Hsieh; Dmitry Tumin; Patrick I McConnell; Mark Galantowicz; Joseph D Tobias; Don Hayes
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Scaling the Low-Shear Pulsatile TORVAD for Pediatric Heart Failure.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Gohean; Erik R Larson; Brian H Hsi; Mark Kurusz; Richard W Smalling; Raul G Longoria
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Adverse events in children implanted with ventricular assist devices in the United States: Data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS).

Authors:  David N Rosenthal; Christopher S Almond; Robert D Jaquiss; Christine E Peyton; Scott R Auerbach; David R Morales; Deirdre J Epstein; Ryan S Cantor; Robert L Kormos; David C Naftel; Ryan J Butts; Nancy S Ghanayem; James K Kirklin; Elizabeth D Blume
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Infectious complications of ventricular assist device use in children in the United States: Data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs).

Authors:  Scott R Auerbach; Marc E Richmond; Kurt R Schumacher; Dalia Lopez-Colon; Max B Mitchell; Mark W Turrentine; Ryan S Cantor; Robert A Niebler; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Resource Utilization in Pediatric Patients Supported With Ventricular Assist Devices in the United States: A Multicenter Study From the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support and the Pediatric Health Information System.

Authors:  Joseph W Rossano; Ryan S Cantor; Dingwei Dai; Pirouz Shamszad; Yuan-Shung Huang; Matthew Hall; Kimberly Y Lin; R Erik Edens; P Eugene Parrino; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 7.  Paracorporeal Lung Devices: Thinking Outside the Box.

Authors:  Timothy M Maul; Jennifer S Nelson; Peter D Wearden
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.