Literature DB >> 25850022

Evaluation of anthrax vaccine safety in 18 to 20 year olds: A first step towards age de-escalation studies in adolescents.

James C King1, Yonghong Gao2, Conrad P Quinn3, Thomas M Dreier4, Cabrini Vianney5, Eric M Espeland2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA, BioThrax(®)) is recommended for post-exposure prophylaxis administration for the US population in response to large-scale Bacillus anthracis spore exposure. However, no information exists on AVA use in children and ethical barriers exist to performing pre-event pediatric AVA studies. A Presidential Ethics Commission proposed a potential pathway for such studies utilizing an age de-escalation process comparing safety and immunogenicity data from 18 to 20 year-olds to older adults and if acceptable proceeding to evaluations in younger adolescents. We conducted exploratory summary re-analyses of existing databases from 18 to 20 year-olds (n=74) compared to adults aged 21 to 29 years (n=243) who participated in four previous US government funded AVA studies.
METHODS: Data extracted from studies included elicited local injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) following AVA doses given subcutaneously at 0, 2, and 4 weeks. Additionally, proportions of subjects with ≥4-fold antibody rises from baseline to post-second and post-third AVA doses (seroresponse) were obtained.
RESULTS: Rates of any elicited local AEs were not significantly different between younger and older age groups for local events (79.2% vs. 83.8%, P=0.120) or systemic events (45.4% vs. 50.5%, P=0.188). Robust and similar proportions of seroresponses to vaccination were observed in both age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: AVA was safe and immunogenic in 18 to 20 year-olds compared to 21 to 29 year-olds. These results provide initial information to anthrax and pediatric specialists if AVA studies in adolescents are required.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthrax vaccine; Children; Pediatric medical countermeasure research; Presidential Ethics Committee

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25850022      PMCID: PMC9024341          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   4.169


  34 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in injection site reactions with human vaccines.

Authors:  Ian F Cook
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2009-07-18

2.  Evaluation of sex, race, body mass index and pre-vaccination serum progesterone levels and post-vaccination serum anti-anthrax protective immunoglobulin G on injection site adverse events following anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) in the CDC AVA human clinical trial.

Authors:  Tracy Pondo; Charles E Rose; Stacey W Martin; Wendy A Keitel; Harry L Keyserling; Janiine Babcock; Scott Parker; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland; Michael M McNeil
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Safety of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus (DTaP-IPV) vaccine.

Authors:  Matthew F Daley; W Katherine Yih; Jason M Glanz; Simon J Hambidge; Komal J Narwaney; Ruihua Yin; Lingling Li; Jennifer C Nelson; James D Nordin; Nicola P Klein; Steven J Jacobsen; Eric Weintraub
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Anthrax vaccine: short-term safety experience in humans.

Authors:  P R Pittman; P H Gibbs; T L Cannon; A M Friedlander
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2001-12-12       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Reactogenicity of tetanus, diphtheria, 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine administered as a sixth consecutive acellular pertussis vaccine dose to adolescents.

Authors:  Johannes G Liese; Nikolaus Rieber; Thomas Malzer; Marion Ocak; David R Johnson; Michael D Decker
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Tolerability and antibody response in adolescents and adults revaccinated with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine adsorbed (Tdap) 4-5 years after a previous dose.

Authors:  Scott A Halperin; Shelly McNeil; Joanne Langley; Mark Blatter; Marc Dionne; Joanne Embree; Roehl Johnson; Thomas Latiolais; William Meekison; Francisco Noya; Shelly Senders; Paul Zickler; David R Johnson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Frequency and domain specificity of toxin-neutralizing paratopes in the human antibody response to anthrax vaccine adsorbed.

Authors:  Donald Reason; Justine Liberato; Jinying Sun; Wendy Keitel; Jianhui Zhou
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  Anthrax vaccine: a review.

Authors:  John D Grabenstein
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.479

9.  Neutralizing antibodies and persistence of immunity following anthrax vaccination.

Authors:  James F Hanson; Sarah C Taft; Alison A Weiss
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2006-02

10.  Conference report on public health and clinical guidelines for anthrax.

Authors:  Eric Jacob Stern; Kristin Broome Uhde; Sean Vincent Shadomy; Nancy Messonnier
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current State of Anthrax Vaccines and Key R&D Gaps Moving Forward.

Authors:  Adam Clark; Daniel N Wolfe
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 2.  Recent developments in the understanding and use of anthrax vaccine adsorbed: achieving more with less.

Authors:  Jarad M Schiffer; Michael M McNeil; Conrad P Quinn
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.683

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.