Literature DB >> 24768633

Evaluation of sex, race, body mass index and pre-vaccination serum progesterone levels and post-vaccination serum anti-anthrax protective immunoglobulin G on injection site adverse events following anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) in the CDC AVA human clinical trial.

Tracy Pondo1, Charles E Rose2, Stacey W Martin2, Wendy A Keitel3, Harry L Keyserling4, Janiine Babcock5, Scott Parker6, Robert M Jacobson7, Gregory A Poland7, Michael M McNeil8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) administered intramuscularly (IM) results in fewer adverse events (AEs) than subcutaneous (SQ) administration. Women experience more AEs than men. Antibody response, female hormones, race, and body mass index (BMI) may contribute to increased frequency of reported injection site AEs.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the CDC AVA human clinical trial. This double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial enrolled 1563 participants and followed them through 8 injections (AVA or placebo) over a period of 42 months. For the trial's vaccinated cohort (n=1267), we used multivariable logistic regression to model the effects of study group (SQ or IM), sex, race, study site, BMI, age, and post-vaccination serum anti-PA IgG on occurrence of AEs of any severity grade. Also, in a women-only subset (n=227), we assessed effect of pre-vaccination serum progesterone level and menstrual phase on AEs.
RESULTS: Participants who received SQ injections had significantly higher proportions of itching, redness, swelling, tenderness and warmth compared to the IM study group after adjusting for other risk factors. The proportions of redness, swelling, tenderness and warmth were all significantly lower in blacks vs. non-black participants. We found arm motion limitation, itching, pain, swelling and tenderness were more likely to occur in participants with the highest anti-PA IgG concentrations. In the SQ study group, redness and swelling were more common for obese participants compared to participants who were not overweight. Females had significantly higher proportions of all AEs compared to males. Menstrual phase was not associated with any AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: Female and non-black participants had a higher proportion of AVA associated AEs and higher anti-PA IgG concentrations. Antibody responses to other vaccines may also vary by sex and race. Further studies may provide better understanding for higher proportions of AEs in women and non-black participants. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthrax vaccine adsorbed; Anthrax vaccines/adverse events; Body mass index; Immunological response; Race; Sex factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768633      PMCID: PMC5761064          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  35 in total

1.  Effect of gender on reporting of MMR adverse events in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  M K Khalil; Y Y Al-Mazrou; Y S Al-Ghamdi; S Tumsah; M Al-Jeffri; A Meshkhas
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.628

2.  Establishment of detailed reference values for luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during different phases of the menstrual cycle on the Abbott ARCHITECT analyzer.

Authors:  Reto Stricker; Raphael Eberhart; Marie-Christine Chevailler; Frank A Quinn; Paul Bischof; René Stricker
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression.

Authors:  A Russell Localio; David J Margolis; Jesse A Berlin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Anthrax vaccine: immunogenicity and safety of a dose-reduction, route-change comparison study in humans.

Authors:  Phillip R Pittman; Gina Kim-Ahn; Dominique Y Pifat; Kevin Coonan; Paul Gibbs; Steve Little; Judith G Pace-Templeton; Robert Myers; Gerald W Parker; Arthur M Friedlander
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Risk of disability for US army personnel vaccinated against anthrax, 1998-2005.

Authors:  Sandra I Sulsky; Rose S Luippold; Patrick Garman; Hayley Hughes; Paul J Amoroso
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Joint and limb symptoms in children after immunisation with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine.

Authors:  C M Benjamin; G C Chew; A J Silman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-25

Review 7.  Sex hormones as immunomodulators in health and disease.

Authors:  D Verthelyi
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.932

8.  Effect of gender, race, and parental education on immunogenicity and reported reactogenicity of acellular and whole-cell pertussis vaccines.

Authors:  C Christy; M E Pichichero; G F Reed; M D Decker; E L Anderson; M B Rennels; J A Englund; K M Edwards; M C Steinhoff
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Effects of a reduced dose schedule and intramuscular administration of anthrax vaccine adsorbed on immunogenicity and safety at 7 months: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Nina Marano; Brian D Plikaytis; Stacey W Martin; Charles Rose; Vera A Semenova; Sandra K Martin; Alison E Freeman; Han Li; Mark J Mulligan; Scott D Parker; Janiine Babcock; Wendy Keitel; Hana El Sahly; Gregory A Poland; Robert M Jacobson; Harry L Keyserling; Stephen D Soroka; Sarah P Fox; John L Stamper; Michael M McNeil; Bradley A Perkins; Nancy Messonnier; Conrad P Quinn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Infection and vaccination in chronic fatigue syndrome: myth or reality?

Authors:  Shmuel Appel; Joab Chapman; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.815

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Adversomics: a new paradigm for vaccine safety and design.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitaker; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 2.  The first steps towards the era of personalised vaccinology: predicting adverse reactions.

Authors:  P Pellegrino; F S Falvella; V Perrone; C Carnovale; T Brusadelli; M Pozzi; S Antoniazzi; S Cheli; C Perrotta; E Clementi; S Radice
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 3.  The role of Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms in vaccine immune response.

Authors:  P Pellegrino; F S Falvella; S Cheli; C Perrotta; E Clementi; S Radice
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 4.  The weight of obesity on the human immune response to vaccination.

Authors:  Scott D Painter; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Unique Inflammatory Mediators and Specific IgE Levels Distinguish Local from Systemic Reactions after Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed Vaccination.

Authors:  Lori Garman; Kenneth Smith; Emily E Muns; Cathy A Velte; Christina E Spooner; Melissa E Munroe; A Darise Farris; Michael R Nelson; Renata J M Engler; Judith A James
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2016-08-05

6.  Evaluation of anthrax vaccine safety in 18 to 20 year olds: A first step towards age de-escalation studies in adolescents.

Authors:  James C King; Yonghong Gao; Conrad P Quinn; Thomas M Dreier; Cabrini Vianney; Eric M Espeland
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 4.169

7.  Multivalent Chromosomal Expression of the Clostridium botulinum Serotype A Neurotoxin Heavy-Chain Antigen and the Bacillus anthracis Protective Antigen in Lactobacillus acidophilus.

Authors:  Sarah O'Flaherty; Todd R Klaenhammer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Current State of Anthrax Vaccines and Key R&D Gaps Moving Forward.

Authors:  Adam Clark; Daniel N Wolfe
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 9.  Recent developments in the understanding and use of anthrax vaccine adsorbed: achieving more with less.

Authors:  Jarad M Schiffer; Michael M McNeil; Conrad P Quinn
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.683

Review 10.  Subcutaneous vaccine administration - an outmoded practice.

Authors:  Ian F Cook
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.