Literature DB >> 25849600

Primary Endoscopic Realignment of Urethral Disruption Injuries--A Double-Edged Sword?

Niels V Johnsen1, Roger R Dmochowski2, Stephen Mock2, W Stuart Reynolds2, Douglas F Milam2, Melissa R Kaufman2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Controversy remains regarding initial management of traumatic urethral disruption injuries. We evaluated the outcomes of primary endoscopic realignment vs suprapubic tube placement in this patient population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our urological trauma database for patients with blunt trauma related posterior urethral injuries from 2000 to 2014. Patients underwent primary endoscopic realignment or suprapubic tube placement alone. The primary outcome was the success of primary realignment, defined as no further need for urological intervention. Secondary outcomes were the need for endoscopic interventions and/or urethroplasty, time to urethroplasty, urethroplasty success and long-term functional outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 27 patients underwent primary realignment and 14 underwent suprapubic tube placement. Mean followup was 40 months (median 24, range 1 to 152). Realignment was successful in 10 patients (37%) at a mean followup of 67.3 weeks (median 27.3, range 4 to 284). In the 17 cases (63%) that failed mean time to failure was 9.7 weeks (median 8.5, range 1 to 26). Seven patients (26%) treated with realignment and 11 (79%) with a suprapubic tube proceeded to urethroplasty. Mean ± SD time to urethroplasty was significantly shorter in the suprapubic tube group (14.6 ± 7.6 vs 5.8 ± 1.6 months, p = 0.003). There was no difference in operative time, complications, success or functional outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Management of traumatic urethral disruption injuries by primary endoscopic realignment serves as definitive therapy in more than a third of treated patients. It prevents the need for formal urethroplasty in more than half of failed cases.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopy; nonpenetrating; urethra; urethral stricture; urinary bladder; wounds

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25849600     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries.

Authors:  Niels V Johnsen; David F Penson; W Stuart Reynolds; Douglas F Milam; Roger R Dmochowski; Melissa R Kaufman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury.

Authors:  Niels Vass Johnsen; Rachel A Moses; Sean P Elliott; Alex J Vanni; Nima Baradaran; Garrick Greear; Thomas G Smith; Michael A Granieri; Nejd F Alsikafi; Bradley A Erickson; Jeremy B Myers; Benjamin N Breyer; Jill C Buckley; Lee C Zhao; Bryan B Voelzke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  [Infra- and supradiaphragmatic urethral injuries. Acute treatment].

Authors:  O Engel; K Boehm; M Rink; A Soave; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Outcomes Following Primary Realignment Versus Suprapubic Cystostomy with Delayed Urethroplasty for Pelvic Fracture-Associated Posterior Urethral Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Light; Tanya Gupta; Maria Dadabhoy; Allen Daniel; Madura Nandakumar; Abigail Burrows; Sandeep Karthikeyan
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-11-13

Review 5.  Emergency treatment of male blunt urethral trauma in China: Outcome of different methods in comparison with other countries.

Authors:  Yumeng Zhang; Kaile Zhang; Qiang Fu
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-08-07

Review 6.  Treatment of posterior urethral distractions defects following pelvic fracture.

Authors:  Emilio Ríos; Luís Martínez-Piñeiro
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 7.  Current management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries: to realign or not?

Authors:  Ashley N Dixon; Jack C Webb; Jessica L Wenzel; J Stuart Wolf; E Charles Osterberg
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

8.  An American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) prospective multi-center research protocol: outcomes of urethral realignment versus suprapubic cystostomy after pelvic fracture urethral injury.

Authors:  Rachel A Moses; John Patrick Selph; Bryan B Voelzke; Joshua Piotrowski; Jairam R Eswara; Bradley A Erickson; Shubham Gupta; Roger R Dmochowski; Niels V Johnsen; Anand Shridharani; Sarah D Blaschko; Sean P Elliott; Ian Schwartz; Catherine R Harris; Kristy Borawski; Bradley D Figler; E Charles Osterberg; Frank N Burks; William Bihrle; Brandi Miller; Richard A Santucci; Benjamin N Breyer; Brian Flynn; Ty Higuchi; Fernando J Kim; Joshua A Broghammer; Angela P Presson; Jeremy B Myers
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

9.  Sexual function following pelvic fracture urethral injury and posterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Mazzone; Ross Anderson; Bryan B Voelzke; Alex J Vanni; Sean P Elliott; Benjamin N Breyer; Bradley A Erickson; Jill Buckley; Jeremy Myers
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 10.  Pelvic fracture urethral injury in males-mechanisms of injury, management options and outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel C Barratt; Jason Bernard; Anthony R Mundy; Tamsin J Greenwell
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.