| Literature DB >> 25848680 |
Kelly Yoshizaki, Jôse Mára Brito, Henrique T Moriya, Alessandra C Toledo, Sandra Ferzilan, Ana Paula Ligeiro de Oliveira, Isabel D Machado, Sandra H P Farsky, Luiz F F Silva, Milton A Martins, Paulo H N Saldiva, Thais Mauad, Mariangela Macchione.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diesel exhaust particles (DEPs) are deposited into the respiratory tract and are thought to be a risk factor for the development of diseases of the respiratory system. In healthy individuals, the timing and mechanisms of respiratory tract injuries caused by chronic exposure to air pollution remain to be clarified.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25848680 PMCID: PMC4345004 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-015-0172-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Figure 1Respiratory mechanics parameters in saline or DEP exposed mice during 90 days. (A) tissue elastance (Htis), (B) tissue damping (Gtis) and (C) airway resistance (Raw). The central line defines the median, the borders above and below the shaded areas represent the 25% and 75% percentiles, respectively, and the error bars represent the 5% and 95% percentiles. The grey box represents saline group and stripped box represent DEP group. (D) Respiratory mechanics after methacholine challenge in saline (white circle) or DEP (black circle) exposed mice, where Raw means airway resistance. There were not statistically difference significant between groups.
Density of macrophages (MAC2+ cells), CD4+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, IL-13 epithelial cells, Muc5ac (mRNA), bronchial epithelial thickness in DEP and saline groups after 90 days of exposure
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| 47.74 (0.00-143.54) | 79.64 (52.36-158.73) |
|
| 210.22 ± 98.43 | 221.43 ± 108.89 |
|
| 793.41 (664.34-893.47) | 888.56 (761.59-1111.11) |
|
| 0.10 (0.04-0.27) | 0.15 (0.00-0.72) |
|
| 9.20 (7.55-11.33) | 6.89 (6.47-10.51) |
|
| 0.34 ± 0.11 | 0.11 ± 0.10* |
Date are presented as means ± SD or medians (interquartile ranges). * p = 0.008.
Figure 2Airspace enlargement in the lungs in saline or DEP exposed mice. (A) Mean linear intercept (Lm) (*p ≤ 0.001) and (B) parameter D2 (*p = 0.038). Lung parenchyma morphology. Photomicrography of mice lung parenchyma (HE), 90 days after exposure with saline (C) or a concentration of DEP of 30 μg/10 μL (D). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 3Elastic fibers (resorcin-fuchsin) and collagen fibers (sirius red) in the parenchyma region. Photomicrography of mice lung parenchyma showing elastic fibers (A, B) and collagen fibers (C, D) in saline (A, C) and DEP group (B, D). There were no statistically significant differences among groups in the proportion of elastic (p = 0.08) or collagen fibers (p = 0.208) occupied in the lung parenchyma. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Differential cell counts in the bronchoalveolar lavage between DEP and saline groups
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.004 ± 0.005 | 0.007 ± 0.008 |
|
| 1.801 ± 0.546 | 2.900 ± 1.327 |
|
| 0.051 ± 0.060 | 0.235 ± 0.301* |
Values are mean ± SD. * p = 0.017.
Cytokines expression in the bronchoalveolar lavage of mice treated with DEP and saline after 90 days of exposure
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 6.15 ± 3.70 | 8.89 ± 2.41 |
|
| 476.84 ± 241.95 | 305.26 ± 200.04 |
|
| 408.6 ± 328.02 | 318.16 ± 241.86 |
|
| 131.30 (109.46-289.36) | 93.22 (84.33-102.25)* |
Date are presented as means ± SD or medians (interquartile ranges). IL = Interleukin, INF-γ = Interferon-gamma. * p = 0.03.
Figure 4CD3+ and CD8+ T cells density in lung parenchyma in saline or DEP exposed mice. Photomicrography of mice lung parenchyma showing CD3+ (A,B) and CD8+ T cells (C, D) in saline (A, C) and DEP group (B, D). Observe the increased density of these cells in the DEP group. Scale bar = 20 μm. The graphs show expression of CD3+ T lymphocytes and CD8+ T lymphocytes in saline and DEP group. The median is represented as horizontal bars. CD3+ T lymphocytes: *p ≤ 0.001 compared with saline group. CD8+ T lymphocytes: *p ≤ 0.001 compared with saline group.