| Literature DB >> 25848306 |
Ting Gui1, Guangwen Yuan2, Keng Shen1, Dongyan Cao1, Jiaxin Yang1, Ming Wu1, Jinghe Lang1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study reported here was to investigate the protective effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) against cyclophosphamide (CTX)-induced gonadotoxicity.Entities:
Keywords: CTX; GnRHa; gonadotoxicity; ovarian reserve; premature ovarian failure
Year: 2015 PMID: 25848306 PMCID: PMC4376258 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S78729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Primers used for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of sex steroid receptors
| mRNA | RT-PCR primers (5′→3′) | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| ERα | GATCCTTCTAGACCCTTCAGTG | 419 |
| TCTTCCAGAGACTTCAAGGTGCT | ||
| ERβ | AGAGTCCTTGGTGTGAAGCA | 251 |
| GGCTGGACAGATATAGTCAT | ||
| PR | CCATGTGGCAAATCCCACAGGAGT | 320 |
| CGGAAATTCCACAGCCAGTGCC | ||
| AR | CCATGGGGTTGGGTGTGGAA | 276 |
| TCCCAGAGCTACCTGCTTCA | ||
| GAPDH | CGGCAAGTTCAATGGCACAGT | 609 |
| TCATACTTGGCAGGTTTCTCC |
Abbreviations: AR, androgen receptor; ERα, estrogen receptor alpha; ERβ, estrogen receptor beta; PR, progesterone receptor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase.
Figure 1Serum levels of estradiol (E2) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in rats receiving different regimens of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa).
Notes: (A) E2 and (B) FSH showed continual decline in rats receiving 0.25 mg/rat or 0.50 mg/rat without significant difference between these two regimens.
Figure 2Assessment of ovarian reserve in terms of ovary weight, follicular number, diameter, and percentage, and serum levels of estradiol (E2) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). (A) Ovary weight in the three treated groups was significantly reduced compared with in the control group at treatment end (Day 60). One month later, groups receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa; alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide [CTX]) showed a significant weight gain, while weight was maintained at a very low level in the CTX-alone group. (B) The total number of follicles in the GnRHa+CTX group was significantly higher than in the CTX-alone group at the end of the treatment period (Day 60) and 30 days post-treatment. (C) Follicular diameter in the GnRHa+CTX group was significantly lower than in the CTX-alone group at Day 60, but had recovered to a higher level 30 days post-treatment. (D) The percentage of small follicles in the GnRHa+CTX group was higher than that in the CTX-alone group at Day 60, but had decreased markedly 30 days post-treatment. Serum levels of (E) E2 and (F) FSH in the GnRHa+CTX group showed significant decrease on Days 30 and 60 relative to the control group (P<0.001) and had recovered to a normal level 30 days post-treatment, while in the CTX-alone group, a continual increase of serum E2 and FSH could be observed.
Notes: Asterisks (*) indicate comparisons with control group: *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. The change symbol (Δ) refers to comparisons between the GnRHa+CTX group and the CTX-alone group: ΔΔP<0.01; ΔΔΔP<0.001.
Figure 3Representative immunohistochemical staining of (A) estrogen receptor alpha, (B) estrogen receptor beta, (C) progesterone receptor, and (D) androgen receptor in rat ovaries.
Note: No significant differences in the four hormone receptors were found among the four groups.
Expressions of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), progesterone receptor (PR), and androgen receptor (AR) of rat ovaries at both messenger (mRNA) and protein levels
| Group | Rats, n | mRNA intensity
| TISS results of IHC
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERα | ERβ | PR | AR | ERα | ERβ | PR | AR | ||
| 1 | 20 | 0.24±0.18 | 1.27±0.51 | 0.88±0.34 | 1.57±0.59 | 5.1±1.0 | 15.1±1.2 | 8.6±0.5 | 18.4±2.0 |
| 2 | 20 | 0.29±0.21 | 1.35±0.47 | 0.76±0.31 | 1.39±0.51 | 4.9±1.0 | 15.5±1.4 | 8.5±1.2 | 19.0±1.9 |
| 3 | 20 | 0.27±0.15 | 1.13±0.46 | 0.85±0.40 | 1.63±0.57 | 4.9±1.3 | 15.2±1.8 | 9.1±1.5 | 17.9±2.1 |
| 4 | 20 | 0.24±0.19 | 1.26±0.49 | 0.68±0.32 | 1.46±0.54 | 4.7±1.4 | 15.2±1.0 | 8.5±1.2 | 18.4±2.0 |
Notes: No significant differences in the four hormone receptors were found among the four groups. “Positive expression” was defined as the presence of yellow-brown granules in nuclei. Staining results were evaluated by a semiquantitative scoring criterion evaluating both the intensity and proportion of immuno-positive cells. A staining index was calculated by multiplying the staining intensity (negative =1, primrose yellow =2, yellow-brown =3, or dark brown =4) and staining proportion (≤25%=1, 26%–50%=2, 50%–75%=3, >75%=4).
Abbreviations: IHC, immunohistochemistry; TISS, total immune-staining score.