Literature DB >> 25847250

Formation and decay of the arrestin·rhodopsin complex in native disc membranes.

Florent Beyrière1, Martha E Sommer1, Michal Szczepek1, Franz J Bartl2, Klaus Peter Hofmann2, Martin Heck1, Eglof Ritter3.   

Abstract

In the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin, light-induced cis/trans isomerization of the retinal ligand triggers a series of distinct receptor states culminating in the active Metarhodopsin II (Meta II) state, which binds and activates the G protein transducin (Gt). Long before Meta II decays into the aporeceptor opsin and free all-trans-retinal, its signaling is quenched by receptor phosphorylation and binding of the protein arrestin-1, which blocks further access of Gt to Meta II. Although recent crystal structures of arrestin indicate how it might look in a precomplex with the phosphorylated receptor, the transition into the high affinity complex is not understood. Here we applied Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to monitor the interaction of arrestin-1 and phosphorylated rhodopsin in native disc membranes. By isolating the unique infrared signature of arrestin binding, we directly observed the structural alterations in both reaction partners. In the high affinity complex, rhodopsin adopts a structure similar to Gt-bound Meta II. In arrestin, a modest loss of β-sheet structure indicates an increase in flexibility but is inconsistent with a large scale structural change. During Meta II decay, the arrestin-rhodopsin stoichiometry shifts from 1:1 to 1:2. Arrestin stabilizes half of the receptor population in a specific Meta II protein conformation, whereas the other half decays to inactive opsin. Altogether these results illustrate the distinct binding modes used by arrestin to interact with different functional forms of the receptor.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR); arrestin; infrared spectroscopy (IR spectroscopy); rhodopsin; signal transduction; spectroscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25847250      PMCID: PMC4432306          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.620898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  52 in total

1.  FTIR spectroscopy of complexes formed between metarhodopsin II and C-terminal peptides from the G-protein alpha- and gamma-subunits.

Authors:  F Bartl; E Ritter; K P Hofmann
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2000-05-12       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Arrestin and its splice variant Arr1-370A (p44). Mechanism and biological role of their interaction with rhodopsin.

Authors:  Katrin Schröder; Alexander Pulvermüller; Klaus Peter Hofmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Infrared spectra and chain conformation of proteins.

Authors:  S KRIMM
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Secondary structure and dosage of soluble and membrane proteins by attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy on hydrated films.

Authors:  E Goormaghtigh; V Cabiaux; J M Ruysschaert
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1990-10-24

5.  Dynamics of arrestin-rhodopsin interactions: acidic phospholipids enable binding of arrestin to purified rhodopsin in detergent.

Authors:  Martha E Sommer; W Clay Smith; David L Farrens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Monitoring the GAP catalyzed H-Ras GTPase reaction at atomic resolution in real time.

Authors:  C Allin; M R Ahmadian; A Wittinghofer; K Gerwert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  GPCR-interacting proteins, major players of GPCR function.

Authors:  Pascal Maurice; Jean-Luc Guillaume; Abla Benleulmi-Chaachoua; Avais M Daulat; Maud Kamal; Ralf Jockers
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2011

Review 8.  Quantitative studies of the structure of proteins in solution by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  J L Arrondo; A Muga; J Castresana; F M Goñi
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  Monomeric rhodopsin is sufficient for normal rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) phosphorylation and arrestin-1 binding.

Authors:  Timothy H Bayburt; Sergey A Vishnivetskiy; Mark A McLean; Takefumi Morizumi; Chih-Chin Huang; John J G Tesmer; Oliver P Ernst; Stephen G Sligar; Vsevolod V Gurevich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Regulation of arrestin binding by rhodopsin phosphorylation level.

Authors:  Sergey A Vishnivetskiy; Dayanidhi Raman; Junhua Wei; Matthew J Kennedy; James B Hurley; Vsevolod V Gurevich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Diverse Roles of Arrestin Scaffolds in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling.

Authors:  Yuri K Peterson; Louis M Luttrell
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  The arrestin-1 finger loop interacts with two distinct conformations of active rhodopsin.

Authors:  Matthias Elgeti; Roman Kazmin; Alexander S Rose; Michal Szczepek; Peter W Hildebrand; Franz J Bartl; Patrick Scheerer; Klaus Peter Hofmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Supramolecular organization of rhodopsin in rod photoreceptor cell membranes.

Authors:  Paul S-H Park
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Single-molecule analysis reveals agonist-specific dimer formation of µ-opioid receptors.

Authors:  Jan Möller; Ali Isbilir; Titiwat Sungkaworn; Brendan Osberg; Christos Karathanasis; Vikram Sunkara; Eugene O Grushevskyi; Andreas Bock; Paolo Annibale; Mike Heilemann; Christof Schütte; Martin J Lohse
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 16.174

5.  C-edge loops of arrestin function as a membrane anchor.

Authors:  Ciara C M Lally; Brian Bauer; Jana Selent; Martha E Sommer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Functional trade-offs and environmental variation shaped ancient trajectories in the evolution of dim-light vision.

Authors:  Gianni M Castiglione; Belinda Sw Chang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.