Literature DB >> 25844700

Radial Artery Applanation Tonometry for Continuous Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement: A Comparison With Intermittent Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution in Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery.

Julia Y Wagner1, Harun Sarwari, Gerhard Schön, Mathias Kubik, Stefan Kluge, Hermann Reichenspurner, Daniel A Reuter, Bernd Saugel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Radial artery applanation tonometry allows completely noninvasive continuous cardiac output estimation. The aim of the present study was to compare cardiac output measurements obtained with applanation tonometry (AT-CO) using the T-Line system (Tensys Medical, San Diego, CA) with cardiac output measured by intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC-CO) with regard to accuracy, precision of agreement, and trending ability.
DESIGN: A prospective method comparison study.
SETTING: The study was conducted in a cardiosurgical ICU of a German university hospital. PATIENTS: We performed cardiac output measurements in 50 patients after cardiothoracic surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three independent sets of three consecutive thermodilution measurements (i.e., PAC-CO) each were performed per patient, and AT-CO was measured simultaneously. The average of the three thermodilution cardiac output measurements was compared with the average of the corresponding three AT-CO values resulting in 150 paired cardiac output measurements. In 13 patients, cardiac output-modifying maneuvers performed for clinical reasons additionally allowed to evaluate trending ability. For statistical analysis, we used Bland-Altman analysis, the percentage error, four-quadrant plot, and concordance analysis. Mean PAC-CO was 4.7 ± 1.2 L/min and mean AT-CO was 4.9 ± 1.1 L/min. The mean of differences was -0.2 L/min with 95% limits of agreement of -1.8 to + 1.4 L/min. The percentage error was 34%. The concordance rate was 95%.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous cardiac output measurement using the noninvasive applanation tonometry technology is basically feasible in ICU patients after cardiothoracic surgery. The applanation tonometry technology provides cardiac output values with reasonable accuracy and precision of agreement compared with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution measurements in a clinical study setting and is able to reliably track cardiac output changes induced by cardiac output-modifying maneuvers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25844700     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Meta-analyses on measurement precision of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies in adults].

Authors:  G Pestel; K Fukui; M Higashi; I Schmidtmann; C Werner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul; Bernd Saugel; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Christoph K Hofer; Xavier Monnet; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Daniel A Reuter; Andrew Rhodes; Pierre Squara; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W Scheeren
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Stroke volume and cardiac output measurement in cardiac patients during a rehabilitation program: comparison between tonometry, impedancemetry and echocardiography.

Authors:  Alicia Gonzalez-Represas; Laurent Mourot
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  A comparison of volume clamp method-based continuous noninvasive cardiac output (CNCO) measurement versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients.

Authors:  Julia Y Wagner; Annmarie Körner; Leonie Schulte-Uentrop; Mathias Kubik; Hermann Reichenspurner; Stefan Kluge; Daniel A Reuter; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Assessment of volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department: a systematic approach.

Authors:  C Maurer; J Y Wagner; R M Schmid; B Saugel
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  Comparison between radial artery tonometry pulse analyzer and pulsed-Doppler echocardiography derived hemodynamic parameters in cardiac surgery patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nima Hatam; Ali Aljalloud; Rashad Zayat; Andreas Goetzenich; Ju-Yeon Lee; HeeJung Kang; So-Hyun Jansen-Park; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Giulia Musetti; Heike Schnoering; Rüdiger Autschbach
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Continuous Non-Invasive Arterial Pressure Assessment during Surgery to Improve Outcome.

Authors:  Alena Stenglova; Jan Benes
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-11-17

Review 8.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring options for cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dominic P Recco; Nathalie Roy; Alexander J Gregory; Kevin W Lobdell
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-04-11

10.  Hemodynamic monitoring in the era of digital health.

Authors:  Frederic Michard
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.925

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.