Literature DB >> 33409580

Narrowing of the remnant portal vein diameter and decreased portal vein angle are risk factors for portal vein thrombosis after perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery.

Manh-Thau Cao1,2, Ryota Higuchi3, Takehisa Yazawa1, Shuichiro Uemura1, Wataru Izumo1, Yutaro Matsunaga1, Yasuto Sato4, Satoru Morita5, Toru Furukawa6, Hiroto Egawa1, Masakazu Yamamoto1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, management options, and outcomes of portal vein thrombosis following major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
METHODS: A total of 177 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients who (1) underwent major hepatectomy and (2) underwent investigating the portal vein morphology, which was measured by rotating the reconstructed three-dimensional images after facilitating bone removal using Aquarius iNtuition workstation between 2002 and 2018, were included. Risk factors were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: Six patients developed portal vein thrombosis (3.4%) within a median time of 6.5 (range 0-22) days. Portal vein and hepatic artery resection were performed in 30% and 6% patients, respectively. A significant difference in the probability of the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis (PV) within 30 days was found among patients with portal vein resection, a postoperative portal vein angle < 100°, remnant portal vein diameter < 5.77 mm, main portal vein diameter > 13.4 mm, and blood loss (log-rank test, p = 0.003, p = 0.06, p < 0.0001, p = 0.01, and p = 0.03, respectively). Decreasing the portal vein angle and narrowing of the remnant PV diameter remained significant predictors on multivariate analysis (p = 0.027 and 0.002, respectively). Reoperation with thrombectomy was performed in four patients, and the other two patients were successfully treated with anticoagulants. All six patients subsequently recovered and were discharged between 25 and 70 days postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: Narrowing of the remnant portal vein diameter and a decreased portal vein angle after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are significant independent risk factors for postoperative portal vein thrombosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatectomy; Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; Portal vein; Venous thrombosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33409580     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-02044-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  33 in total

1.  Improved surgical outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: changes in surgical procedures and related outcomes based on 40 years of experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Ryota Higuchi; Takehiro Ota; Takehisa Yazawa; Hideki Kajiyama; Tatsuo Araida; Toru Furukawa; Tatsuya Yoshikawa; Ken Takasaki; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Shohei Yoshiya; Ken Shirabe; Hidekazu Nakagawara; Yuji Soejima; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Toru Ikegami; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Norifumi Harimoto; Akihiro Nishie; Takeharu Yamanaka; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Surgical resection for Bismuth type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  T Ebata; T Mizuno; Y Yokoyama; T Igami; G Sugawara; M Nagino
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Clinical outcomes of left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary malignancy.

Authors:  S G Farid; A White; N Khan; G J Toogood; K R Prasad; J P A Lodge
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma of the left-side predominance: radicality and safety of left-sided hepatectomy.

Authors:  Hiroaki Shimizu; Fumio Kimura; Hiroyuki Yoshidome; Masayuki Ohtsuka; Atsushi Kato; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Katsunori Furukawa; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience.

Authors:  Sung Gyu Lee; Gi Won Song; Shin Hwang; Tae Yong Ha; Deok Bog Moon; Dong Hwan Jung; Ki Hun Kim; Chul Soo Ahn; Myung Hwan Kim; Sung Koo Lee; Kyu Bo Sung; Gi Young Ko
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 7.027

7.  Incidence, risk factors, and management options for portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy: a 14-year, single-center experience.

Authors:  Satoshi Kuboki; Hiroaki Shimizu; Masayuki Ohtsuka; Atsushi Kato; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Katsunori Furukawa; Tsukasa Takayashiki; Shigetsugu Takano; Daiki Okamura; Daisuke Suzuki; Nozomu Sakai; Shingo Kagawa; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Surgical Outcomes for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma with Vascular Invasion.

Authors:  Ryota Higuchi; Takehisa Yazawa; Shuichiro Uemura; Wataru Izumo; Takehiro Ota; Kosuke Kiyohara; Toru Furukawa; Hiroto Egawa; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Comparison analysis of left-side versus right-side resection in bismuth type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  YouJin Lee; DongWook Choi; Sunjong Han; In Woong Han; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2018-11-27

10.  Analysis of risk factors for portal vein thrombosis after liver resection.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Han; Dong-Sik Kim; Young Dong Yu; Sung Won Jung; Young In Yoon; Hye Sung Jo
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.