| Literature DB >> 25844319 |
Miriam Cooper1, Anita Thapar2, Derek K Jones3.
Abstract
AIMS: This analysis examined hypothesised associations between microstructural attributes in specific white matter (WM) tracts selected a priori and measures of clinical variability in adolescents with a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Firstly, associations were explored between WM microstructure and ADHD severity in the subgenual cingulum. Secondly, to ensure that tract-specific approaches afforded enhanced rather than differential sensitivity, associations were measured between WM microstructure and autistic traits in the right corticospinal tract based on results of a previously-published voxelwise analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); Autism spectrum disorder (ASD); Diffusion MRI; Spherical deconvolution; Tractography; White matter
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25844319 PMCID: PMC4375644 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.02.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Demographic and clinical sample characteristics.
| ADHD group (n = 17) | Control group (n = 17) | U value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD, range | Mean | SD, range | ||||
| Age, years | 15.6 | (1.3, 14.3–18.6) | 16.9 | (1.2, 15.0–18.8) | 223 | 0.006 | |
| Mean full scale IQ | 87.6 | (9.8, 75–110) | 106.9 | (7.6, 98–122) | 265 | <0.001 | |
| Mean total ADHD symptoms score (max 54) | 37.8 | (11.5, 8–53) | 4.5 | (4.2, 0–14) | 4 | <0.001 | |
| Mean SCQ score (max 40) | 7.1 | (5.90, 1–22) | 1.0 | (1.06, 0–3) | 19 | <0.001 | |
| Mean SDQ difficulties score (max 40) | 19.1 | (8.00, 5–35) | 2.9 | (2.45, 0–8) | 285 | <0.001 | |
| Family income group | Low, % | 50 | 5.9 | 252 | <0.001 | ||
| Medium, % | 50 | 11.8 | |||||
| High, % | 0 | 82.4 | |||||
| Took medication on morning of scan day | Yes | 10 | N/a | N/a | N/a | ||
| No | 6 | N/a | N/a | N/a | |||
| Unknown | 1 | N/a | N/a | N/a | |||
HI, hyperactive–inattentive; I, inattentive; SCQ, Social Communication Questionnaire; SDQ, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. U value = Mann Whitney U test statistic for differences in the distribution of variables between groups.
Low: annual household income <£20,000, medium: annual household income £20–40,000, high: annual household income >£40,000 (information not available for one participant with ADHD).
Fig. 1Tractography reconstructions from two individuals. Tractography reconstructions from two individual (left side shown). Light blue — subgenual cingulum. Blue — corticospinal tract. Tracts overlain on mean of diffusion weighted images. The CST was split into inferior and superior segments at the level of the lateral sulcus.
Correlations between diffusion parameters and ADHD symptom scores in the left subgenual cingulum.
| Total ADHD score | |
|---|---|
| Left SGC: FA | 0.553 ( |
| Left SGC: MD | −0.248 ( |
| Left SGC: RD | −0.454 ( |
| Left SGC: AD | 0.318 ( |
All figures are Pearson's coefficient. SGC — subgenual cingulum. FA — fractional anisotropy. MD — mean diffusivity. RD — radial diffusivity. AD — axial diffusivity.
Significant at p < 0.05 (2-tailed).
Trend significant.
Fig. 2Scatter plot of correlations between diffusion parameters and total ADHD symptom scores in the left subgenual cingulum. Units for radial diffusivity = 10−3 mm2 s−1. Linear trendlines are shown. For fractional anisotropy, R = 0.553 (p = 0.021). For radial diffusivity, R = −0.454 (p = 0.067).
Significant correlations between diffusion parameters and ASD symptom scores.
| Total SCQ score | |
|---|---|
| Right inferior CST: FA | 0.506 ( |
| Right inferior CST: MD | −0.395 ( |
| Right inferior CST: RD | −0.542 ( |
| Right inferior CST: AD | 0.120 ( |
All other figures are Pearson's coefficient. Italics — post-hoc tests of correlations with subscale scores. SCQ — social communication questionnaire. CST — corticospinal tract. FA — fractional anisotropy. MD — mean diffusivity. RD — radial diffusivity. AD — axial diffusivity.
Significant at p < 0.05 (2-tailed).
Spearman's rho.
Fig. 3Scatter plot of correlations between diffusion parameters and autistic symptom scores in the right inferior corticospinal tract. SCQ, social communication questionnaire. Units for radial diffusivity = 10−3 mm2 s−1. Linear trendlines are shown. For fractional anisotropy, R = 0.506 (p = 0.038). For radial diffusivity, R = −0.542 (p = 0.025).