| Literature DB >> 25844307 |
Lindie du Plessis1, Sandra W Jacobson2, Christopher D Molteno3, Frances C Robertson1, Bradley S Peterson4, Joseph L Jacobson2, Ernesta M Meintjes1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Classical eyeblink conditioning (EBC), an elemental form of learning, is among the most sensitive indicators of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. The cerebellum plays a key role in maintaining timed movements with millisecond accuracy required for EBC. Functional MRI (fMRI) was used to identify cerebellar regions that mediate timing in healthy controls and the degree to which these areas are also recruited in children with prenatal alcohol exposure. EXPERIMENTALEntities:
Keywords: Cerebellum; Eyeblink conditioning; Fetal alcohol syndrome; Finger tapping; Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); Prenatal alcohol exposure
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25844307 PMCID: PMC4377649 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.12.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1Timing diagram of the rhythmic/non-rhythmic task.
Sample characteristics.
| Demographic | FAS/PFAS | HE | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 17 | 16 | NA | |
| Child's age at assessment (yr) | 10.5 ± 0.6 | 11.0 ± 0.7 | 10.6 ± 0.4 | 4.04 |
| Sex (M/F) | 11/6 | 11/6 | 8/8 | 0.98 |
| WISC-IV IQ | 67.2 ± 11.6 | 77.7 ± 8.9 | 73.8 ± 11.3 | 4.17 |
| Child's cerebellar volume (ml) | 124.4 ± 10.5 | 136.2 ± 12.3 | 130.9 ± 9.3 | 4.95 |
| Maternal age at delivery (yr) | 30.2 ± 7.8 | 24.8 ± 5.1 | 25.5 ± 3.2 | 4.37 |
| Maternal education (yr) | 7.4 ± 3.4 | 9.3 ± 2.4 | 10.4 ± 1.4 | 5.02 |
| Absolute alcohol consumed per day across pregnancy (oz.) | 1.1 ± 0.9 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 16.16 |
| Absolute alcohol consumed per occasion across pregnancy (oz.) | 4.1 ± 1.9 | 2.7 ± 1.6 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 32.14 |
| Drinking days per week averaged across pregnancy | 1.8 ± 1.0 | 0.9 ± 0.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 22.51 |
| Cigarettes smoked per day during pregnancy | 7.1 ± 5.2 | 6.3 ± 5.2 | 3.7 ± 6.8 | 0.56 |
| Lead exposure (µg/dl) | 11.6 ± 6.8 | 9.8 ± 3.0 | 8.8 ± 4.0 | 1.38 |
Values are means ± SD.
FAS = fetal alcohol syndrome, PFAS = partial FAS, HE = heavily exposed nonsyndromal.
FAS/PFAS < HE (p = 0.02), HE > control (p = 0.02).
FAS/PFAS < HE (p = 0.01), FAS/PFAS < control (p = 0.09).
FAS/PFAS < HE (p < 0.01), FAS/PFAS < control (p = 0.09).
FAS/PFAS > HE (p = 0.01), FAS/PFAS > control (p = 0.03).
FAS/PFAS < HE (p = 0.04), FAS/PFAS < control (p < 0.01).
Maternal education missing for mother of 1 child with FAS.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
Behavioral performance by diagnostic group.
| FAS/PFAS | HE | CTL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 17 | 16 | NA | NA | ||
| Rhythmic tapping | SD | 91.12 ± 28.94 | 92.02 ± 43.31 | 81.56 ± 31.20 | 0.45 | 0.64 |
| Number of missed taps | 2.32 ± 1.56 | 2.89 ± 1.67 | 2.16 ± 1.80 | 0.83 | 0.45 | |
| Non-rhythmic tapping | SD | 351.60 ± 151.39 | 334.62 ± 131.65 | 328.83 ± 113.40 | 0.54 | 0.59 |
| Difference between taps and stimuli presented | 2.72 ± 4.22 | 1.58 ± 3.24 | 1.81 ± 2.95 | 1.97 | 0.14 |
Values are means ± within-group standard deviations.
FAS = fetal alcohol syndrome, PFAS = partial FAS, HE = heavily exposed nonsyndromal.
Cerebellar regions showing significantly greater activation during rhythmic finger tapping compared to non-rhythmic finger tapping in control children.
| Brain region | MNI peak coordinates | Cluster size (mm3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | |||
| Right crus I | 50 | −59 | −36 | 5.18 | 194 |
| Vermis IV–V | 2 | −59 | −2 | 4.40 | 1151 |
| Vermis VI | 4 | −79 | −24 | 4.19 | 796 |
| Right lobule VI | 12 | −62 | −17 | 3.55 | 219 |
Minimum cluster size 193 mm3.
Nomenclature as proposed by Schmahmann et al. (2000).
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01.
Fig. 2(a) Right anterolateral, (b) superior coronal and (c) left anterolateral views of right crus I, vermi IV–VI and right lobule VI regions showing greater activation in control children during rhythmic tapping compared to non-rhythmic tapping. Functional data are shown in the Spatially Unbiased Cerebellar Atlas Template space (MNI coordinates).
Comparison by diagnostic group of differences in percent BOLD signal change between rhythmic and non-rhythmic finger tapping in four cerebellar ROIs that are activated more during rhythmic tapping than non-rhythmic tapping in control children.
| Brain region | FAS/PFAS | HE | CTL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right crus I | −0.05 ± 0.39 | 0.03 ± 0.70 | 0.73 ± 0.98 | 5.59 | 0.01 |
| Vermis IV–V | 0.10 ± 0.53 | 0.57 ± 0.65 | 0.60 ± 0.88 | 2.68 | 0.08 |
| Vermis VI | 0.12 ± 0.43 | 0.22 ± 0.53 | 0.21 ± 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.76 |
| Right lobule VI | 0.12 ± 0.33 | 0.19 ± 0.51 | 0.29 ± 0.29 | 0.79 | 0.46 |
Values are means ± SD.
Nomenclature as proposed by Schmahmann et al. (2000).
FAS = fetal alcohol syndrome, PFAS = partial FAS, HE = heavily exposed nonsyndromal.
FAS/PFAS < control (p < 0.01), HE < control (p = 0.01).
FAS/PFAS < HE (p = 0.06), FAS/PFAS < control (p = 0.05).
Percent signal change around center of mass.
Relation of extent of prenatal alcohol exposure to BOLD activation in regions with significant differences in activation between rhythmic and non-rhythmic finger tapping in control children.
| Absolute alcohol consumed per day at conception | Absolute alcohol consumed per occasion around conception | Drinking days per week around time of conception | Absolute alcohol consumed per day across pregnancy | Absolute alcohol consumed per occasion averaged across pregnancy | Drinking days per week across pregnancy | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | β | β | β | β | β | |||||||
| Right crus I | −0.32 | −0.28 | −0.18 | −0.16 | −0.40 | −0.35 | −0.36 | −0.32 | −0.30 | −0.28 | −0.46 | −0.41 |
| Vermis IV–V | −0.23 | −0.17 | −0.31 | −0.26 | −0.23 | −0.18 | −0.20 | −0.13 | −0.35 | −0.28 | −0.18 | −0.11 |
| Vermis VI | −0.04 | −0.04 | −0.29 | −0.29 | 0.63 | 0.63 | −0.04 | −0.04 | −0.25 | −0.25 | −0.02 | −0.02 |
| Right lobule VI | −0.25 | −0.25 | −0.42 | −0.42 | −0.09 | −0.09 | −0.26 | −0.26 | −0.37 | −0.37 | −0.15 | −0.15 |
Nomenclature as proposed by Schmahmann et al. (2000).
r is the simple Pearson correlation between alcohol exposure and percent signal change values; β is the standardized regression coefficient after adjustment for the potential confounding variables.
Controlling for sex in the multiple regression analysis.
Controlling for maternal smoking.
Percent signal change around center of mass.
p < 0.10.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
Fig. 3Correlation of frequency of alcohol exposure across pregnancy with activation in right crus I.
Fig. 4Correlation of absolute alcohol consumed per occasion around time of conception and activation in right lobule VI.
Relation of activation in regions of interest activated more during rhythmic than non-rhythmic finger tapping by control children to eyeblink conditioning performance in control children.
| Right crus I | Vermis IV−V | Vermis VI | Right lobule VI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delay — 5 yr ( | −0.79 | 0.12 | −0.18 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.16 | −0.77 | 0.13 |
| Delay — 9 yr ( | −0.27 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.10 | 0.73 | −0.59 | 0.03 |
| Trace — 9 yr ( | −0.56 | 0.07 | 0.30 | 0.38 | −0.24 | 0.49 | −0.59 | 0.06 |
Values are Pearson r.