Literature DB >> 25844215

Crystal structure of di-aqua-[5,10,15,20-tetra-kis-(4-bromo-phen-yl)porphyrinato-κ(4) N]magnesium.

Nesrine Amiri1, Soumaya Nasri1, Thierry Roisnel2, Gérard Simonneaux3, Habib Nasri1.   

Abstract

The title compound, [Mg(C44H24Br4N4)(H2O)2] or [Mg(TBrPP)(H2O)2], where TBrPP is the 5,10,15,20-tetra-kis-(4-bromo-phen-yl)porphyrinato ligand, was obtained unintentionally as a by-product of the reaction of the [Mg(TBrPP)] complex with an excess of di-methyl-glyoxime in di-chloro-methane. The entire mol-ecule exhibits point group symmetry 4/m. In the asymmetric unit, except for two C atoms of the phenyl ring, all other atoms lie on special positions. The Mg(II) atom is situated at a site with symmetry 4/m, while the N and the C atoms of the porphyrin macrocycle, as well as two C atoms of the phenyl ring and the Br atom lie in the mirror plane containing the porphyrin core. The H atoms of the axially bonded water mol-ecule are incompatible with the fourfold rotation axis and are disordered over two sites. In the crystal, mol-ecules are packed in rows along [001]. Weak inter-molecular C-H⋯π and C-H⋯Br inter-actions, as well as O-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, stabilize the crystal packing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C—H⋯Br inter­actions; C—H⋯π inter­actions; O—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds; crystal structure; magnesium porphyrin complex

Year:  2015        PMID: 25844215      PMCID: PMC4350761          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015003722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Related literature

For general background to magnesium porphyrin species and their applications, see: Ghosh et al. (2010 ▸). For the synthesis of the [MgII(TPP)(H2O)] complex (TPP is the 5,10,15,20-tetra­phenyl­porphyrinate ligand), see: Timkovich & Tulinsky (1969 ▸). In the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.35; Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸), there are six magnesium porphyrin structures with aqua ligands deposited. Four from these structures are mono­aqua species, derived from [Mg(TOMePP)(H2O)] (TOMePP is the 5,10,15,20-tetra­kis­(4-meth­oxy­phen­yl)porphyrinate ligand; Yang & Jacobson, 1991 ▸) and one is a di­aqua derivative, [Mg(TPP)(H2O)2]·(18-C-6) where 18-C-6 is 18-crown-6 ether (Ezzayani et al., 2013 ▸). For the related porphyrin species [Mg(TPP)(4-pic)2] (4-pic = 4-picoline) and [Mg(TPP)(H2O)], see: McKee et al. (1984 ▸) and Ong et al. (1986 ▸), respectively. The H atom position of the aqua axial ligand was calculated with the program CALC-OH (Nardelli, 1999 ▸).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Mg(C44H24Br4N4)(H2O)2] M = 988.65 Tetragonal, a = 14.8313 (10) Å c = 9.3966 (8) Å V = 2066.9 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 3.95 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.37 × 0.27 × 0.14 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006 ▸) T min = 0.409, T max = 0.575 4471 measured reflections 1248 independent reflections 940 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.034

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.031 wR(F 2) = 0.073 S = 1.06 1248 reflections 81 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.34 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006 ▸); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2006 ▸); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999 ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▸). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015003722/wm5127sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015003722/wm5127Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. 44 24 4 4 2 2 . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015003722/wm5127fig1.tif A view of the mol­ecular structure of [Mg(C44H24N4Br4)(H2O)2] showing the atom numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms have been omitted for clarity. Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015003722/wm5127fig2.tif A portion of the crystal packing of the title complex, viewed down [001], showing C—H⋯π inter­actions (dotted light-blue lines) and C—H⋯Br and O—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds (dashed pink lines). CCDC reference: 1050856 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Mg(C44H24Br4N4)(H2O)2]Dx = 1.589 Mg m3
Mr = 988.65Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, I4/mCell parameters from 1411 reflections
Hall symbol: -I 4θ = 2.6–26.9°
a = 14.8313 (10) ŵ = 3.95 mm1
c = 9.3966 (8) ÅT = 150 K
V = 2066.9 (2) Å3Prism, black
Z = 20.37 × 0.27 × 0.14 mm
F(000) = 976
Bruker APEXII diffractometer940 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.034
CCD rotation images, thin slices scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006)h = −14→19
Tmin = 0.409, Tmax = 0.575k = −18→18
4471 measured reflectionsl = −5→12
1248 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.073H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0364P)2 + 0.9155P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1248 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.009
81 parametersΔρmax = 0.50 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.34 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Mg0.50.50.50.0248 (5)
O10.50.50.2636 (4)0.0376 (9)
H1O10.473 (4)0.560 (3)0.210 (6)0.045*0.5
N10.46158 (17)0.36592 (17)0.50.0192 (6)
C10.3751 (2)0.3337 (2)0.50.0183 (7)
C20.3771 (2)0.2366 (2)0.50.0195 (7)
H20.32620.19770.50.023*
C30.4643 (2)0.2109 (2)0.50.0219 (7)
H30.48650.15080.50.026*
C40.5177 (2)0.2931 (2)0.50.0196 (7)
C50.2966 (2)0.3872 (2)0.50.0179 (7)
C110.2081 (2)0.33768 (19)0.50.0192 (7)
C120.16663 (16)0.31403 (16)0.6263 (3)0.0307 (6)
H120.19420.32990.7140.037*
C130.08517 (16)0.26732 (17)0.6273 (3)0.0324 (6)
H130.05720.25120.71460.039*
C140.0463 (2)0.2451 (2)0.50.0229 (7)
Br1−0.06342 (2)0.17805 (2)0.50.03531 (15)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mg0.0142 (7)0.0142 (7)0.0461 (16)000
O10.0376 (13)0.0376 (13)0.038 (2)000
N10.0124 (13)0.0162 (14)0.0290 (16)−0.0007 (10)00
C10.0169 (16)0.0150 (16)0.0231 (18)−0.0024 (12)00
C20.0199 (16)0.0152 (15)0.0233 (18)−0.0031 (12)00
C30.0246 (17)0.0137 (15)0.0274 (19)0.0007 (13)00
C40.0186 (16)0.0167 (16)0.0234 (18)−0.0014 (13)00
C50.0164 (16)0.0165 (16)0.0209 (18)−0.0009 (13)00
C110.0166 (16)0.0114 (15)0.0296 (19)0.0002 (12)00
C120.0260 (13)0.0389 (15)0.0272 (14)−0.0117 (11)0.0002 (11)−0.0054 (12)
C130.0295 (14)0.0356 (15)0.0321 (15)−0.0096 (11)0.0095 (12)−0.0013 (12)
C140.0158 (16)0.0129 (16)0.040 (2)−0.0010 (12)00
Br10.01523 (19)0.0223 (2)0.0684 (3)−0.00419 (14)00
Mg—N1i2.069 (2)C3—C41.454 (4)
Mg—N12.069 (2)C3—H30.95
Mg—N1ii2.069 (2)C4—C5iii1.412 (4)
Mg—N1iii2.069 (2)C5—C4i1.412 (4)
Mg—O1ii2.221 (4)C5—C111.504 (4)
Mg—O12.221 (4)C11—C121.382 (3)
O1—H1O11.10 (5)C11—C12iv1.382 (3)
N1—C41.363 (4)C12—C131.393 (3)
N1—C11.368 (4)C12—H120.95
C1—C51.409 (4)C13—C141.369 (3)
C1—C21.440 (4)C13—H130.95
C2—C31.348 (4)C14—C13iv1.369 (3)
C2—H20.95C14—Br11.906 (3)
N1i—Mg—N189.998 (2)N1—C4—C3109.4 (3)
N1—Mg—N1ii180.00 (14)C5iii—C4—C3125.1 (3)
O1ii—Mg—O1180C1—C5—C4i126.4 (3)
Mg—O1—H1O1117 (3)C1—C5—C11116.5 (3)
C4—N1—C1107.1 (2)C4i—C5—C11117.1 (3)
C4—N1—Mg126.4 (2)C12—C11—C12iv118.3 (3)
C1—N1—Mg126.5 (2)C12—C11—C5120.85 (15)
N1—C1—C5125.3 (3)C12iv—C11—C5120.85 (15)
N1—C1—C2109.3 (3)C11—C12—C13121.3 (2)
C5—C1—C2125.5 (3)C11—C12—H12119.4
C3—C2—C1107.6 (3)C13—C12—H12119.4
C3—C2—H2126.2C14—C13—C12118.7 (2)
C1—C2—H2126.2C14—C13—H13120.7
C2—C3—C4106.6 (3)C12—C13—H13120.7
C2—C3—H3126.7C13—C14—C13iv121.9 (3)
C4—C3—H3126.7C13—C14—Br1119.04 (15)
N1—C4—C5iii125.5 (3)C13iv—C14—Br1119.05 (15)
N1i—Mg—N1—C4180C1—N1—C4—C30
N1iii—Mg—N1—C40Mg—N1—C4—C3180
O1ii—Mg—N1—C4−90C2—C3—C4—N10
O1—Mg—N1—C490C2—C3—C4—C5iii180
N1i—Mg—N1—C10N1—C1—C5—C4i0
N1iii—Mg—N1—C1180C2—C1—C5—C4i180
O1ii—Mg—N1—C190N1—C1—C5—C11180
O1—Mg—N1—C1−90C2—C1—C5—C110
C4—N1—C1—C5180C1—C5—C11—C1289.7 (3)
Mg—N1—C1—C50C4i—C5—C11—C12−90.3 (3)
C4—N1—C1—C20C1—C5—C11—C12iv−89.7 (3)
Mg—N1—C1—C2180C4i—C5—C11—C12iv90.3 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C30C12iv—C11—C12—C130.2 (5)
C5—C1—C2—C3180C5—C11—C12—C13−179.3 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40C11—C12—C13—C14−0.1 (4)
C1—N1—C4—C5iii180C12—C13—C14—C13iv0.1 (5)
Mg—N1—C4—C5iii0C12—C13—C14—Br1178.2 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C13—H13···Cg1v0.952.743.615 (3)153
O1—H1O1···Br1vi1.10 (5)2.69 (5)3.741 (3)159 (4)
C2—H2···Br1vii0.952.973.914 (3)175 (1)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

Cg1 is the centroid of the N1/C1C4 pyrrole ring.

DHA DHHA D A DHA
C13H13Cg1i 0.952.743.615(3)153
O1H1O1Br1ii 1.10(5)2.69(5)3.741(3)159(4)
C2H2Br1iii 0.952.973.914(3)175(1)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  4 in total

1.  Effect of five membered versus six membered meso-substituents on structure and electronic properties of Mg(II) porphyrins: a combined experimental and theoretical study.

Authors:  Avijit Ghosh; Shaikh M Mobin; Roland Fröhlich; Ray J Butcher; Dilip K Maity; Mangalampalli Ravikanth
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  The Cambridge Structural Database in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Frank H Allen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Diaqua-(5,10,15,20-tetra-phenyl-porphyrinato-κ(4)N)magnesium-18-crown-6 (1/1).

Authors:  Khaireddine Ezzayani; Soumaya Nasri; Mohamed Salah Belkhiria; Jean-Claude Daran; Habib Nasri
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-01-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.