Literature DB >> 25844199

Crystal structure of tetra-aquabis(1,3-dimethyl-2,6-dioxo-3,7-di-hydro-1H-purin-9-ido)magnesium.

Yabin Shi1, Benyong Lou1.   

Abstract

The title complex, [Mg(C7H7N4O2)2(H2O)4], lies across an inversion centre and the Mg(II) atom is coordinated in a slightly distorted octa-hedral environment by four aqua ligands in the equatorial sites and two 1,3-dimethyl-2,6-dioxo-3,7-di-hydro-1H-purin-9-ide ligands, through imidazole ring N atoms, in the axial sites. An intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bond forms an S(7) graph-set motif. In the crystal, O-H⋯O and O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds link complex mol-ecules forming a three-dimensional network incorporating R 4 (2)(8) and R 2 (2)(18) graph-set motifs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; tetra­aqua mononuclear MgII complex; theophylline

Year:  2015        PMID: 25844199      PMCID: PMC4350700          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015003758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Co-crystallization represents a crystal engineering approach for modifying properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) (Sun, 2013 ▸). Metal coordination is an alternative strategy without changing chemical structures of APIs (Ma & Moulton, 2007 ▸). Theophylline is a methylxanthine drug in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Barnes, 2003 ▸). In this study, we reacted theophylline with the MgII ion in a basic solution to give rise to a tetra­aqua mononuclear MgII complex, (I).

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of (I) is shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The complex lies across an inversion centre and the MgII atom is coordin­ated in a slightly distorted octa­hedral environment (Table 1 ▸) by four aqua ligands in the equatorial sites and two 1,3-dimethyl-2,6-dioxo-3,7-di­hydro-1H-purin-9-ide ligands, through imidazole ring N atoms [N1 and N1(−x + 1, −y, −z + 1)], in the axial sites. The symmetry-unique purine ring system is essentially planar, with a maximum deviation of 0.030 (2) Å for N3 and the bonded methyl C atoms C4 and C5 deviate from this mean plane by −0.118 (3) and 0.136 (2) Å, respectively.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title complex, shown with 30% probability displacement ellipsoids [symmetry code: (A) x, −y, −z + 1).

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (, )

Mg1O3i 2.0672(17)Mg1N1i 2.2255(19)
Mg1O4i 2.081(2)  
    
O3iMg1O3180.00(3)O4Mg1N1i 91.31(6)
O3Mg1O4i 87.98(7)O3Mg1N190.06(6)
O3Mg1O492.02(7)O4Mg1N188.69(6)
O4iMg1O4180.0N1iMg1N1180.0
O3Mg1N1i 89.94(6)  

Symmetry code: (i) .

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, the coordinating water mol­ecules are involved in various hydrogen-bonding inter­actions (Table 2 ▸). A (8) graph-set motif (Bernstein et al., 1995 ▸) is formed through [O4⋯O1iii = 2.829 (3) Å and O4⋯O1iv = 2.780 (2) Å; symmetry codes: (iii) −x, −y, −z; (iv) x, y, z + 1] between a coordinating water mol­ecule and a carbonyl group of a symmetry-related theophylline group. The mononuclear units are connected into a layer parallel to (010) (Fig. 2 ▸), which is further connected into a three-dimensional structure (Fig. 3 ▸) by hydrogen-bonding inter­actions between coordin­ating water mol­ecules and symmetry-related imidazole groups [O3⋯N2ii = 2.809 (3) Å; symmetry code: (ii) x, −y + , z + ].
Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
O3H3AN2ii 0.88(1)1.97(1)2.809(3)160(3)
O3H3BO2i 0.87(1)1.80(1)2.668(2)173(3)
O4H4EO1iii 0.87(1)1.93(1)2.780(2)168(3)
O4H4DO1iv 0.87(1)1.96(1)2.829(3)178(3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

Figure 2

Part of the crystal structure, showing hydrogen bonds in two dimensions (dashed lines).

Figure 3

Part of the crystal structure, showing the overall three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded structure (dashed lines).

Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.36, November 2014; Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸) revealed 16 metal complexes of theophylline, including ternary, polynuclear complexes and coordination polymers but only five are mononuclear complexes. The most closely related compound to the title complex, in terms of the ligand types is tri­aqua­bis­(theophylline)copper(II) dihydrate (WEZYIJ; Begum & Manohar, 1994 ▸). The title compound is the first crystal structure reported to date of a complex of theophylline with an alkaline-earth metal.

Synthesis and crystallization

Theophylline (180 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in water (20 ml). An aqueous solution (15 ml) of NaOH (40 mg, 1 mmol) was added slowly. MgCl2·6H2O (102 mg, 0.5 mmol) in water (15 ml) was then added. The resulting solution was kept in air and, after several days, colourless block-shaped crystals were obtained.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. H atoms bonded to C atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å) with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) or 1.5U eq(C). H atoms bonded to O atoms were located in difference Fourier maps and were refined with a distance restraint of O—H = 0.87 (1) Å. The isotropic displacement parameters were refined freely.
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Mg(C7H7N4O2)2(H2O)4]
M r 454.71
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)295
a, b, c ()7.694(4), 13.399(7), 9.739(5)
()105.169(9)
V (3)969.0(9)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo K
(mm1)0.16
Crystal size (mm)0.2 0.2 0.2
 
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2000)
T min, T max 0.949, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections7442, 2153, 1738
R int 0.032
(sin /)max (1)0.650
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.049, 0.123, 1.09
No. of reflections2153
No. of parameters160
No. of restraints4
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
max, min (e 3)0.29, 0.25

Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2000 ▸), SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸) and X-SEED (Barbour, 2001 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, LOU. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015003758/lh5752sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015003758/lh5752Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1050901 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Mg(C7H7N4O2)2(H2O)4]F(000) = 476
Mr = 454.71Dx = 1.558 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2170 reflections
a = 7.694 (4) Åθ = 2.7–27.5°
b = 13.399 (7) ŵ = 0.16 mm1
c = 9.739 (5) ÅT = 295 K
β = 105.169 (9)°Prism, colorless
V = 969.0 (9) Å30.2 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm
Z = 2
Rigaku CCD diffractometer2153 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1738 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.032
Detector resolution: 14.6306 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.7°
CCD_Profile_fitting scansh = −8→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2000)k = −17→17
Tmin = 0.949, Tmax = 1.000l = −11→12
7442 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.123H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.09w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0542P)2 + 0.4099P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2153 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
160 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
4 restraintsΔρmin = −0.25 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mg10.50000.00000.50000.0220 (2)
O10.0856 (2)−0.02565 (12)−0.27579 (14)0.0366 (4)
O20.2118 (2)−0.14692 (11)0.17770 (15)0.0396 (4)
O30.5654 (2)0.14587 (11)0.56135 (16)0.0361 (4)
O40.2306 (2)0.02272 (14)0.49391 (16)0.0419 (4)
N10.4375 (2)0.04557 (11)0.27257 (16)0.0253 (4)
N20.4425 (2)0.16133 (12)0.09955 (17)0.0295 (4)
N30.2518 (2)0.07368 (12)−0.10112 (17)0.0277 (4)
N40.1533 (2)−0.08355 (12)−0.04781 (17)0.0260 (4)
C10.4967 (3)0.13335 (14)0.2386 (2)0.0285 (4)
H10.57330.17450.30830.034*
C20.3344 (2)0.01127 (14)0.14086 (19)0.0231 (4)
C30.3417 (3)0.08329 (14)0.0411 (2)0.0241 (4)
C40.2540 (4)0.15494 (17)−0.2003 (2)0.0426 (6)
H4A0.36230.1497−0.23500.064*
H4B0.25430.2190−0.15170.064*
H4C0.14680.1507−0.28090.064*
C50.0602 (3)−0.17694 (16)−0.1029 (2)0.0379 (5)
H5A−0.0695−0.1645−0.13670.057*
H5B0.0827−0.2270−0.02690.057*
H5C0.1054−0.2016−0.18190.057*
C60.1602 (2)−0.01192 (15)−0.1483 (2)0.0263 (4)
C70.2344 (3)−0.07757 (14)0.1001 (2)0.0256 (4)
H3A0.505 (3)0.2015 (13)0.557 (3)0.058 (8)*
H3B0.644 (3)0.149 (2)0.6439 (17)0.059 (9)*
H4D0.188 (4)0.007 (2)0.566 (2)0.072 (10)*
H4E0.142 (3)0.023 (2)0.4175 (19)0.055 (8)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mg10.0247 (5)0.0223 (4)0.0169 (5)0.0003 (3)0.0018 (3)0.0002 (3)
O10.0312 (8)0.0563 (10)0.0181 (7)−0.0009 (7)−0.0013 (6)−0.0023 (6)
O20.0501 (9)0.0329 (8)0.0287 (8)−0.0141 (7)−0.0021 (7)0.0066 (6)
O30.0495 (10)0.0243 (7)0.0278 (8)0.0015 (7)−0.0020 (7)−0.0018 (6)
O40.0278 (8)0.0722 (12)0.0239 (9)0.0027 (8)0.0034 (7)0.0008 (8)
N10.0292 (9)0.0234 (8)0.0207 (8)−0.0013 (6)0.0022 (7)−0.0005 (6)
N20.0375 (9)0.0255 (8)0.0238 (9)−0.0042 (7)0.0052 (7)0.0021 (6)
N30.0311 (9)0.0309 (9)0.0189 (8)0.0003 (7)0.0026 (7)0.0055 (6)
N40.0252 (8)0.0274 (8)0.0225 (8)−0.0018 (6)0.0010 (7)−0.0027 (6)
C10.0323 (10)0.0253 (10)0.0257 (10)−0.0041 (8)0.0037 (8)−0.0012 (8)
C20.0242 (9)0.0244 (9)0.0193 (9)0.0017 (7)0.0035 (7)0.0005 (7)
C30.0248 (9)0.0253 (9)0.0211 (9)0.0040 (7)0.0042 (7)0.0007 (7)
C40.0566 (15)0.0412 (13)0.0274 (12)0.0027 (11)0.0064 (10)0.0114 (9)
C50.0399 (12)0.0357 (11)0.0332 (12)−0.0078 (9)0.0011 (10)−0.0100 (9)
C60.0202 (9)0.0367 (11)0.0205 (10)0.0047 (8)0.0029 (7)−0.0006 (8)
C70.0257 (10)0.0274 (9)0.0223 (10)0.0003 (7)0.0039 (8)0.0000 (7)
Mg1—O3i2.0672 (17)N3—C61.361 (3)
Mg1—O32.0672 (17)N3—C31.383 (2)
Mg1—O4i2.081 (2)N3—C41.459 (3)
Mg1—O42.081 (2)N4—C61.382 (3)
Mg1—N1i2.2255 (19)N4—C71.414 (3)
Mg1—N12.2255 (19)N4—C51.472 (3)
O1—C61.238 (2)C1—H10.9500
O2—C71.238 (2)C2—C31.381 (3)
O3—H3A0.875 (10)C2—C71.416 (3)
O3—H3B0.872 (10)C4—H4A0.9800
O4—H4D0.873 (10)C4—H4B0.9800
O4—H4E0.867 (10)C4—H4C0.9800
N1—C11.334 (3)C5—H5A0.9800
N1—C21.398 (2)C5—H5B0.9800
N2—C31.337 (2)C5—H5C0.9800
N2—C11.361 (3)
O3i—Mg1—O3180.00 (3)C6—N4—C5115.94 (16)
O3i—Mg1—O4i92.02 (7)C7—N4—C5117.55 (16)
O3—Mg1—O4i87.98 (7)N1—C1—N2116.97 (17)
O3i—Mg1—O487.98 (7)N1—C1—H1121.5
O3—Mg1—O492.02 (7)N2—C1—H1121.5
O4i—Mg1—O4180.0C3—C2—N1107.34 (17)
O3i—Mg1—N1i90.06 (6)C3—C2—C7120.60 (17)
O3—Mg1—N1i89.94 (6)N1—C2—C7132.06 (17)
O4i—Mg1—N1i88.69 (6)N2—C3—C2111.89 (17)
O4—Mg1—N1i91.31 (6)N2—C3—N3125.57 (17)
O3i—Mg1—N189.94 (6)C2—C3—N3122.53 (17)
O3—Mg1—N190.06 (6)N3—C4—H4A109.5
O4i—Mg1—N191.31 (6)N3—C4—H4B109.5
O4—Mg1—N188.69 (6)H4A—C4—H4B109.5
N1i—Mg1—N1180.0N3—C4—H4C109.5
Mg1—O3—H3A135.0 (19)H4A—C4—H4C109.5
Mg1—O3—H3B111.8 (19)H4B—C4—H4C109.5
H3A—O3—H3B103 (3)N4—C5—H5A109.5
Mg1—O4—H4D122 (2)N4—C5—H5B109.5
Mg1—O4—H4E125.3 (19)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
H4D—O4—H4E108 (3)N4—C5—H5C109.5
C1—N1—C2102.20 (16)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
C1—N1—Mg1119.32 (12)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
C2—N1—Mg1138.26 (13)O1—C6—N3121.81 (19)
C3—N2—C1101.59 (16)O1—C6—N4120.91 (19)
C6—N3—C3119.72 (16)N3—C6—N4117.28 (17)
C6—N3—C4120.00 (17)O2—C7—N4118.96 (17)
C3—N3—C4120.28 (17)O2—C7—C2127.74 (18)
C6—N4—C7126.42 (16)N4—C7—C2113.31 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3A···N2ii0.88 (1)1.97 (1)2.809 (3)160 (3)
O3—H3B···O2i0.87 (1)1.80 (1)2.668 (2)173 (3)
O4—H4E···O1iii0.87 (1)1.93 (1)2.780 (2)168 (3)
O4—H4D···O1iv0.87 (1)1.96 (1)2.829 (3)178 (3)
  4 in total

Review 1.  Theophylline: new perspectives for an old drug.

Authors:  Peter J Barnes
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  The Cambridge Structural Database in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Frank H Allen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 4.  Cocrystallization for successful drug delivery.

Authors:  Changquan Calvin Sun
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.648

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.