| Literature DB >> 25843564 |
Srikara V Peelukhana1, Shilpi Goenka, Brian Kim, Jay Kim, Amit Bhattacharya, Keith F Stringer, Rupak K Banerjee.
Abstract
To formulate more accu<span class="Species">rate guidelines for <span class="Disease">musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) linked to Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS), delineation of the response of bone tissue under different frequencies and duration of vibration needs elucidation. Rat-tails were vibrated at 125 Hz (9 rats) and 250 Hz (9 rats), at 49 m/s(2), for 1D (6 rats), 5D (6 rats) and 20D (6 rats); D=days (4 h/d). Rats in the control group (6 rats for the vibration groups; 2 each for 1D, 5D, and 20D) were left in their cages, without being subjected to any vibration. Structural and biochemical damages were quantified using empty lacunae count and nitrotyrosine signal-intensity, respectively. One-way repeated-measure mixed-model ANOVA at p<0.05 level of significance was used for analysis. In the cortical bone, structural damage quantified through empty lacunae count was significant (p<0.05) at 250 Hz (10.82 ± 0.66) in comparison to the control group (7.41 ± 0.76). The biochemical damage was significant (p<0.05) at both the 125 Hz and 250 Hz vibration frequencies. The structural damage was significant (p<0.05) at 5D for cortical bone while the trabecular bone showed significant (p<0.05) damage at 20D time point. Further, the biochemical damage increased with increase in the duration of vibration with a significant (p<0.05) damage observed at 20D time point and a near significant change (p=0.08) observed at 5D time point. Structural and biochemical changes in bone tissue are dependent upon higher vibration frequencies of 125 Hz, 250 Hz and the duration of vibration (5D, 20D).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25843564 PMCID: PMC4466877 DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2014-0117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ind Health ISSN: 0019-8366 Impact factor: 2.179
The experimental design for the study with the number of animals in each group
| Vibration frequency | 1D | 5D | 20D | *Total rats for frequency analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | n=2 | n=2 | n=2 | 6 |
| 125 Hz | n=3 | n=3 | n=3 | 9 |
| 250 Hz | n=3 | n=3 | n=3 | 9 |
| *Rats for day analysis | Control = 2, Vibrated = 6 | Control = 2, Vibrated = 6 | Control = 2, Vibrated = 6 |
* number of rats used for the one-way mixed-model data analysis.
Fig. 1.Experimental set up for the rat-tail vibration.
Fig. 2.Photomicrographs of the histological examination of cortical bone in the control and vibrated bone sections using H&E stain. A) Control for 1D; B) 125 Hz for 1D; C) 250 Hz for 1D; D) Control for 5D; E)125 Hz for 5D; F) 250 Hz for 5D; G) Control for 20D; H) 125 Hz for 20D; I) 250 Hz for 20D. Osteocytes are represented by black arrows and the white arrows show empty lacunae in the cortical bone. Magnification is ×40 objective.
Fig. 3.H&E stained images of trabecular bone in the control and vibrated bone sections. A) Control for 1D; B) 125 Hz for 1D; C) 250 Hz for 1D; D) Control for 5D; E) 125 Hz for 5D; F) 250 Hz for 5D; G) Control for 20D; H) 125 Hz for 20D; I) 250 Hz for 20D. T represents trabecular bone and BM represents the bone marrow. Magnification is ×5 objective.
Fig. 4.Representative photomicrographs for NT stained sections for: A) Control for 1D; B) 125 Hz for 1D; C) 250 Hz for 1D; D) Control for 5D; E)125 Hz for 5D; F) 250 Hz for 5D; G) Control for 20D; H) 125 Hz for 20D; I) 250 Hz for 20D. Positive signal in the osteocytes is represented by black arrows and the black triangles show blood vessels in the trabecular bone. Magnification is ×40 objective.
Fig. 5.Bar plots showing the effects of vibration frequency on the parameters quantifying structural changes in the control and vibrated bone sections. n=30 points from 6 rats for the control group, n=34 points from 9 rats for the 125 Hz group, n=40 points from 9 rats for the 250 Hz group. A) Empty lacunae count. B) Osteocyte count/total.
Fig. 6.Bar plot showing the effects of vibration frequency on the biological changes quantified using Nitrotyrosine signal intensity (GSV). n=13 points from 6 rats for the control group, n=23 points from 9 rats for the 125 Hz group, n=19 points from 9 rats for the 250 Hz group.
Fig. 7.Bar plots showing the effects of duration of vibration on parameters quantifying the structural changes in the bone tissue. n=9 points from 2 rats for the control-1D group, n=11 points from 2 rats for the control-5D, n=10 points from 2 rats for the control-20D group. n=18 points from 6 rats for the 1D group, n=28 points from 6 rats for the 5D group, n=28 points from 6 rats for the 20D group. A) Empty lacunae count with individual control groups. B) Osteocyte count/total with individual control groups.
Fig. 8.Bar plots showing the effects of duration of vibration on biological changes quantified using Nitrotyrosine signal intensity (GSV). n=5 points from 2 rats for the control-1D group, n=5 points from 2 rats for the control-5D, n=3 points from 2 rats for the control-20D group. n 18 points from 6 rats for the 1D group, n=14 points from 6 rats for the 5D group, n=10 points from 6 rats for the 20D group.
Fig. 9.Quantification of mineral content by EDX. (A) Bar plot showing the effect of vibration frequency on Ca content (wt%); (B) Bar plot showing the effect of vibration frequency on Ca/P ratio of rat bone.
Fig. 10.Degree of Mineralization of bone from BSE images. (A) shows the representative mineralization curve for bone for all the groups; (B) shows bar plot summarizing the degree of mineralization (denoted by mean grey level) for all the groups.