Literature DB >> 25843366

Positioning of bacterial chemoreceptors.

Christopher W Jones1, Judith P Armitage2.   

Abstract

For optimum growth, bacteria must adapt to their environment, and one way that many species do this is by moving towards favourable conditions. To do so requires mechanisms to both physically drive movement and provide directionality to this movement. The pathways that control this directionality comprise chemoreceptors, which, along with an adaptor protein (CheW) and kinase (CheA), form large hexagonal arrays. These arrays can be formed around transmembrane receptors, resulting in arrays embedded in the inner membrane, or they can comprise soluble receptors, forming arrays in the cytoplasm. Across bacterial species, chemoreceptor arrays (both transmembrane and soluble) are localised to a variety of positions within the cell; some species with multiple arrays demonstrate this variety within individual cells. In many cases, the positioning pattern of the arrays is linked to the need for segregation of arrays between daughter cells on division, ensuring the production of chemotactically competent progeny. Multiple mechanisms have evolved to drive this segregation, including stochastic self-assembly, cellular landmarks, and the utilisation of ParA homologues. The variety of mechanisms highlights the importance of chemotaxis to motile species.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  array segregation; bacterial chemotaxis; cell division; chemoreceptor array; protein localisation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25843366     DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Microbiol        ISSN: 0966-842X            Impact factor:   17.079


  24 in total

Review 1.  Minicells, Back in Fashion.

Authors:  Madeline M Farley; Bo Hu; William Margolin; Jun Liu
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Cell-cell communication, chemotaxis and recruitment in Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Authors:  Evan Lamb; Michael J Trimble; Linda L McCarter
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Essential Role of the Cytoplasmic Chemoreceptor TlpT in the De Novo Formation of Chemosensory Complexes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  Christopher W Jones; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins: a core sensing element in prokaryotes and archaea.

Authors:  Abu Iftiaf Md Salah Ud-Din; Anna Roujeinikova
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Spatiotemporal Organization of Chemotaxis Pathways in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense.

Authors:  Daniel Pfeiffer; Julian Herz; Julia Schmiedel; Felix Popp; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Bacterial Flagellar Motor Switch in Response to CheY-P Regulation and Motor Structural Alterations.

Authors:  Qi Ma; Yoshiyuki Sowa; Matthew A B Baker; Fan Bai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Transmembrane region of bacterial chemoreceptor is capable of promoting protein clustering.

Authors:  Abiola M Pollard; Victor Sourjik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A genomic comparison of 13 symbiotic Vibrio fischeri isolates from the perspective of their host source and colonization behavior.

Authors:  Clotilde Bongrand; Eric J Koch; Silvia Moriano-Gutierrez; Otto X Cordero; Margaret McFall-Ngai; Martin F Polz; Edward G Ruby
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 9.  Behavioral Variability and Phenotypic Diversity in Bacterial Chemotaxis.

Authors:  Adam James Waite; Nicholas W Frankel; Thierry Emonet
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 12.981

10.  The Helicobacter pylori CZB Cytoplasmic Chemoreceptor TlpD Forms an Autonomous Polar Chemotaxis Signaling Complex That Mediates a Tactic Response to Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Kieran D Collins; Tessa M Andermann; Jenny Draper; Lisa Sanders; Susan M Williams; Cameron Araghi; Karen M Ottemann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.