Literature DB >> 25842165

DNA damage checkpoint recovery and cancer development.

Haiyong Wang1, Xiaoshan Zhang2, Lisong Teng3, Randy J Legerski4.   

Abstract

Cell cycle checkpoints were initially presumed to function as a regulator of cell cycle machinery in response to different genotoxic stresses, and later found to play an important role in the process of tumorigenesis by acting as a guard against DNA over-replication. As a counterpart of checkpoint activation, the checkpoint recovery machinery is working in opposition, aiming to reverse the checkpoint activation and resume the normal cell cycle. The DNA damage response (DDR) and oncogene induced senescence (OIS) are frequently found in precancerous lesions, and believed to constitute a barrier to tumorigenesis, however, the DDR and OIS have been observed to be diminished in advanced cancers of most tissue origins. These findings suggest that when progressing from pre-neoplastic lesions to cancer, DNA damage checkpoint barriers are overridden. How the DDR checkpoint is bypassed in this process remains largely unknown. Activated cytokine and growth factor-signaling pathways were very recently shown to suppress the DDR and to promote uncontrolled cell proliferation in the context of oncovirus infection. In recent decades, data from cell line and tumor models showed that a group of checkpoint recovery proteins function in promoting tumor progression; data from patient samples also showed overexpression of checkpoint recovery proteins in human cancer tissues and a correlation with patients׳ poor prognosis. In this review, the known cell cycle checkpoint recovery proteins and their roles in DNA damage checkpoint recovery are reviewed, as well as their implications in cancer development. This review also provides insight into the mechanism by which the DDR suppresses oncogene-driven tumorigenesis and tumor progression.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinogenesis; Cell cycle checkpoints; DNA damage; Neoplasms; Oncogenes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25842165     DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  29 in total

1.  Accelerated pathway evolution in mouse-like rodents involves cell cycle control.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Proteogenomic Characterization of Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yongchao Dou; Emily A Kawaler; Daniel Cui Zhou; Marina A Gritsenko; Chen Huang; Lili Blumenberg; Alla Karpova; Vladislav A Petyuk; Sara R Savage; Shankha Satpathy; Wenke Liu; Yige Wu; Chia-Feng Tsai; Bo Wen; Zhi Li; Song Cao; Jamie Moon; Zhiao Shi; MacIntosh Cornwell; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Rosalie K Chu; Suhas Vasaikar; Hua Zhou; Qingsong Gao; Ronald J Moore; Kai Li; Sunantha Sethuraman; Matthew E Monroe; Rui Zhao; David Heiman; Karsten Krug; Karl Clauser; Ramani Kothadia; Yosef Maruvka; Alexander R Pico; Amanda E Oliphant; Emily L Hoskins; Samuel L Pugh; Sean J I Beecroft; David W Adams; Jonathan C Jarman; Andy Kong; Hui-Yin Chang; Boris Reva; Yuxing Liao; Dmitry Rykunov; Antonio Colaprico; Xi Steven Chen; Andrzej Czekański; Marcin Jędryka; Rafał Matkowski; Maciej Wiznerowicz; Tara Hiltke; Emily Boja; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Ana I Robles; Henry Rodriguez; David Mutch; Katherine Fuh; Matthew J Ellis; Deborah DeLair; Mathangi Thiagarajan; D R Mani; Gad Getz; Michael Noble; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Pei Wang; Matthew L Anderson; Douglas A Levine; Richard D Smith; Samuel H Payne; Kelly V Ruggles; Karin D Rodland; Li Ding; Bing Zhang; Tao Liu; David Fenyö
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Cytokinetic effects of Wee1 disruption in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Qing Chang; Megha Chandrashekhar; Troy Ketela; Yaroslav Fedyshyn; Jason Moffat; David Hedley
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Etoposide radiosensitizes p53-defective cholangiocarcinoma cell lines independent of their G2 checkpoint efficacies.

Authors:  Arunee Hematulin; Sutiwan Meethang; Kitsana Utapom; Sopit Wongkham; Daniel Sagan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Orchestration of DNA Damage Checkpoint Dynamics across the Human Cell Cycle.

Authors:  Hui Xiao Chao; Cere E Poovey; Ashley A Privette; Gavin D Grant; Hui Yan Chao; Jeanette G Cook; Jeremy E Purvis
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 10.304

6.  Galiellalactone induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through the ATM/ATR pathway in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Víctor García; Maribel Lara-Chica; Irene Cantarero; Olov Sterner; Marco A Calzado; Eduardo Muñoz
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-26

7.  Endogenous electromagnetic forces emissions during cell respiration as additional factor in cancer origin.

Authors:  Abraham A Embi
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 8.  The Roles of NDR Protein Kinases in Hippo Signalling.

Authors:  Alexander Hergovich
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  The Interplay of Reactive Oxygen Species, Hypoxia, Inflammation, and Sirtuins in Cancer Initiation and Progression.

Authors:  Marco Tafani; Luigi Sansone; Federica Limana; Tania Arcangeli; Elena De Santis; Milena Polese; Massimo Fini; Matteo A Russo
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Defective DNA repair increases susceptibility to senescence through extension of Chk1-mediated G2 checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Johmura; Emiri Yamashita; Midori Shimada; Keiko Nakanishi; Makoto Nakanishi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.