Augustin R Attwell1, Sandeep Patel2, Michel Kahaleh3, Isaac L Raijman4, Roy Yen1, Raj J Shah1. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas-San Antonio Medical School, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 4. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic pancreatitis, laser lithotripsy (LL) permits stone fragmentation and removal during ERCP with some advantages over extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technical success of LL in pancreatic duct (PD) stones. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Four tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing endotherapy for PD stones. INTERVENTIONS: ERCP with per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP)-guided LL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Technical success was defined as complete stone clearance. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 28 patients (16 men, 51 years [mean age]) underwent a median of 1 (range, 1-4) POP-LL for PD stones. Baseline parameters included pain requiring hospitalization (n=19, 68%), opiate use (n=14, 50%), or weight loss (n=11, 39%). Before POP-LL, 22 of 28 patients (79%) had a median of 1 (range, 1-5) ERCP, 9 of 28 (32%) underwent a median of 2 (range, 1-3) ESWL sessions, and 5 underwent a median of 1 (range, 1-3) POP-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy with failed (n=2) or partial (n=3) fragmentation. A median of 2 (range, 1-3) stones sized 15 mm (range, 4-32 mm) were identified in the head (n=9, 32%), neck (n=3, 11%), body (n=9, 32%), tail (n=1, 4%), or multiple sites (n=6, 21%). Technical success occurred in 22 patients (79%) with complete clearance. Partial clearance occurred in 3 (11%). Clinical success at a median of 13 (range, 1-25) months of follow-up was noted in 25 of 28 patients (89%) by improvement in pain (n=25), decreased narcotic use (n=25), or reduced hospitalizations (n=19). Mild adverse events occurred in 8 of 28 (29%). CONCLUSIONS: POP-LL is feasible at expert centers in patients with accessible stones. Although intensive endotherapy is required, most patients achieve stone clearance and clinical improvement.
BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic pancreatitis, laser lithotripsy (LL) permits stone fragmentation and removal during ERCP with some advantages over extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technical success of LL in pancreatic duct (PD) stones. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Four tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing endotherapy for PD stones. INTERVENTIONS: ERCP with per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP)-guided LL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Technical success was defined as complete stone clearance. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 28 patients (16 men, 51 years [mean age]) underwent a median of 1 (range, 1-4) POP-LL for PD stones. Baseline parameters included pain requiring hospitalization (n=19, 68%), opiate use (n=14, 50%), or weight loss (n=11, 39%). Before POP-LL, 22 of 28 patients (79%) had a median of 1 (range, 1-5) ERCP, 9 of 28 (32%) underwent a median of 2 (range, 1-3) ESWL sessions, and 5 underwent a median of 1 (range, 1-3) POP-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy with failed (n=2) or partial (n=3) fragmentation. A median of 2 (range, 1-3) stones sized 15 mm (range, 4-32 mm) were identified in the head (n=9, 32%), neck (n=3, 11%), body (n=9, 32%), tail (n=1, 4%), or multiple sites (n=6, 21%). Technical success occurred in 22 patients (79%) with complete clearance. Partial clearance occurred in 3 (11%). Clinical success at a median of 13 (range, 1-25) months of follow-up was noted in 25 of 28 patients (89%) by improvement in pain (n=25), decreased narcotic use (n=25), or reduced hospitalizations (n=19). Mild adverse events occurred in 8 of 28 (29%). CONCLUSIONS: POP-LL is feasible at expert centers in patients with accessible stones. Although intensive endotherapy is required, most patients achieve stone clearance and clinical improvement.
Authors: Sunil G Sheth; Darwin L Conwell; David C Whitcomb; Matthew Alsante; Michelle A Anderson; Jamie Barkin; Randall Brand; Gregory A Cote; Steven D Freedman; Andres Gelrud; Fred Gorelick; Linda S Lee; Katherine Morgan; Stephen Pandol; Vikesh K Singh; Dhiraj Yadav; C Mel Wilcox; Phil A Hart Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Samuel Han; Augustin R Attwell; Philip Tatman; Steven A Edmundowicz; Hazem T Hammad; Mihir S Wagh; Sachin Wani; Raj J Shah Journal: Pancreas Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Rabindra R Watson; Mansour A Parsi; Harry R Aslanian; Adam J Goodman; David R Lichtenstein; Joshua Melson; Udayakumar Navaneethan; Rahul Pannala; Amrita Sethi; Shelby A Sullivan; Nirav C Thosani; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; John T Maple Journal: VideoGIE Date: 2018-09-26
Authors: Chang-Il Kwon; Jae Hee Cho; Sung Hoon Choi; Kwang Hyun Ko; Temel Tirkes; Mark A Gromski; Glen A Lehman Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 2.884