Literature DB >> 25841274

Current image acquisition options in PET/MR.

Ronald Boellaard1, Harald H Quick2.   

Abstract

Whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging combines excellent soft tissue contrast and various functional imaging parameters provided by MR with high sensitivity and quantification of radiotracer uptake provided by PET. Although clinical evaluation now is under way, PET/MR demands for new technologies and innovative solutions, currently subject to interdisciplinary research. Attenuation correction (AC) of human soft tissues and of hardware components has to be MR based to maintain quantification of PET imaging as CT attenuation information is missing. MR-based AC is inherently associated with the following challenges: patient tissues are segmented into only few tissue classes, providing discrete attenuation coefficients; bone is substituted as soft tissue in MR-based AC; the limited field of view in MRI leads to truncations in body imaging and, consequently, in MR-based AC; and correct segmentation of lung tissue may be hampered by breathing artifacts. Use of time of flight during PET image acquisition and reconstruction, however, may improve the accuracy of AC. This article provides a status of current image acquisition options in PET/MR hybrid imaging.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25841274     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  14 in total

Review 1.  SPECT and PET in ischemic heart failure.

Authors:  George Angelidis; Gregory Giamouzis; Georgios Karagiannis; Javed Butler; Ioannis Tsougos; Varvara Valotassiou; George Giannakoulas; Nikolaos Dimakopoulos; Andrew Xanthopoulos; John Skoularigis; Filippos Triposkiadis; Panagiotis Georgoulias
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Advances in imaging instrumentation for nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Jae Sung Lee; Gil Kovalski; Tali Sharir; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  The Effect of Defective PET Detectors in Clinical Simultaneous [18F]FDG Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Gaspar Delso; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Martin Huellner; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Systematic imaging in medicine: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Yujie Sun; Shuang Wu; Min Zhou; Xiaohui Zhang; Rui Zhou; Tingting Zhang; Yuanxue Gao; Ting Chen; Yao Chen; Xin Yao; Yasuyoshi Watanabe; Mei Tian; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  General Biomarker Recommendations for Lymphoma.

Authors:  Lisa Rimsza; Yuri Fedoriw; Louis M Staudt; Ari Melnick; Randy Gascoyne; Michael Crump; Lawrence Baizer; Kai Fu; Eric Hsi; John W C Chan; Lisa McShane; John P Leonard; Brad S Kahl; Richard F Little; Jonathan W Friedberg; Lale Kostakoglu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Impact of improved attenuation correction featuring a bone atlas and truncation correction on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR.

Authors:  Mark Oehmigen; Maike E Lindemann; Marcel Gratz; Julian Kirchner; Verena Ruhlmann; Lale Umutlu; Jan Ole Blumhagen; Matthias Fenchel; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI Perform Equally Well in Cancer: Evidence from Studies on More Than 2,300 Patients.

Authors:  Claudio Spick; Ken Herrmann; Johannes Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  18F Fluorocholine Dynamic Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Initial Clinical-Pathologic Comparisons.

Authors:  Joon Young Choi; Jaewon Yang; Susan M Noworolski; Spencer Behr; Albert J Chang; Jeffry P Simko; Hao G Nguyen; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Charline Lasnon; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Terez Sera; Bernhard Sattler; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans.

Authors:  Florian Büther; Alexis Vrachimis; Anne Becker; Lars Stegger
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.