BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Research to cure paralysis associated with myelomeningocele (MMC) is ongoing using the fetal sheep model of MMC. Despite decades of research using this model, no standardized motor function assessment exists. The purpose of this study is to develop a sensitive and reliable locomotor scale for assessing the functional status of sheep. METHODS: Twenty lambs were used to develop and validate the locomotor scale. Lambs (n=15) underwent a surgically created MMC defect at gestational age (GA) 75 days, followed by repair with various methods at GA 100. One lamb underwent a sham operation (n=1). Normal lambs (n=4) served as controls. All lambs were born via spontaneous vaginal delivery, and motor function was assessed for 24 hours. A locomotor rating scale was developed based on behavioral observations of lambs. Inter-rater reliability testing was performed to determine if the scale could be reliably applied by different raters. RESULTS: Observations led to the definition of 7 categories of locomotor recovery. A scoring system was developed to rank these categories. The scale captured a wide variety of neurologic outcomes. Inter-rater reliability revealed minimal variability between examiners (average standard deviation ±0.431). The average score for all raters was within 1 point of the consensus score 100% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The sheep locomotor rating scale is capable of capturing subtle differences in neurologic function with minimal inter-rater variability. We propose a standardized rating scale for neurologic outcomes and believe this is a critical component for assessing the validity of experimental treatments to cure paralysis in MMC.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Research to cure paralysis associated with myelomeningocele (MMC) is ongoing using the fetal sheep model of MMC. Despite decades of research using this model, no standardized motor function assessment exists. The purpose of this study is to develop a sensitive and reliable locomotor scale for assessing the functional status of sheep. METHODS: Twenty lambs were used to develop and validate the locomotor scale. Lambs (n=15) underwent a surgically created MMC defect at gestational age (GA) 75 days, followed by repair with various methods at GA 100. One lamb underwent a sham operation (n=1). Normal lambs (n=4) served as controls. All lambs were born via spontaneous vaginal delivery, and motor function was assessed for 24 hours. A locomotor rating scale was developed based on behavioral observations of lambs. Inter-rater reliability testing was performed to determine if the scale could be reliably applied by different raters. RESULTS: Observations led to the definition of 7 categories of locomotor recovery. A scoring system was developed to rank these categories. The scale captured a wide variety of neurologic outcomes. Inter-rater reliability revealed minimal variability between examiners (average standard deviation ±0.431). The average score for all raters was within 1 point of the consensus score 100% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The sheep locomotor rating scale is capable of capturing subtle differences in neurologic function with minimal inter-rater variability. We propose a standardized rating scale for neurologic outcomes and believe this is a critical component for assessing the validity of experimental treatments to cure paralysis in MMC.
Authors: Sandra K Kabagambe; Y Julia Chen; Melissa A Vanover; Payam Saadai; Diana L Farmer Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: John W Steele; Sharon Bayliss; John Bayliss; Ying Linda Lin; Bogdan J Wlodarczyk; Robert M Cabrera; Yohannes G Asfaw; Thomas J Cummings; Richard H Finnell; Timothy M George Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2019-06-29 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Aijun Wang; Erin G Brown; Lee Lankford; Benjamin A Keller; Christopher D Pivetti; Nicole A Sitkin; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Diana L Farmer Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: Saul Wilson; Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; John W Miller; Chandan G Reddy; Sina Safayi; Douglas C Fredericks; Nicholas D Jeffery; Nicole A DeVries-Watson; Sara K Shivapour; Stephanus Viljoen; Brian D Dalm; Katherine N Gibson-Corley; Michael D Johnson; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Laura A Galganski; Kaeli J Yamashiro; Christopher D Pivetti; Benjamin A Keller; James C Becker; Erin G Brown; Payam Saadai; Shinjiro Hirose; Aijun Wang; Diana L Farmer Journal: Fetal Diagn Ther Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 2.587
Authors: Laura A Galganski; Priyadarsini Kumar; Melissa A Vanover; Christopher D Pivetti; Jamie E Anderson; Lee Lankford; Zachary J Paxton; Karen Chung; Chelsey Lee; Mennatalla S Hegazi; Kaeli J Yamashiro; Aijun Wang; Diana L Farmer Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Sarah C Stokes; Jordan E Jackson; Christina M Theodorou; Christopher D Pivetti; Priyadarsini Kumar; Kaeli J Yamashiro; Aijun Wang; Diana L Farmer Journal: Fetal Diagn Ther Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 2.208
Authors: Christina M Theodorou; Sarah C Stokes; Jordan E Jackson; Christopher D Pivetti; Priyadarsini Kumar; Kaeli J Yamashiro; Zachary J Paxton; Lizette Reynaga; Alicia A Hyllen; Aijun Wang; Diana L Farmer Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 2.549