Literature DB >> 25839737

Metrics for Radiologists in the Era of Value-based Health Care Delivery.

Ammar Sarwar1, Giles Boland, Annamarie Monks, Jonathan B Kruskal.   

Abstract

Accelerated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, health care delivery in the United States is poised to move from a model that rewards the volume of services provided to one that rewards the value provided by such services. Radiology department operations are currently managed by an array of metrics that assess various departmental missions, but many of these metrics do not measure value. Regulators and other stakeholders also influence what metrics are used to assess medical imaging. Metrics such as the Physician Quality Reporting System are increasingly being linked to financial penalties. In addition, metrics assessing radiology's contribution to cost or outcomes are currently lacking. In fact, radiology is widely viewed as a contributor to health care costs without an adequate understanding of its contribution to downstream cost savings or improvement in patient outcomes. The new value-based system of health care delivery and reimbursement will measure a provider's contribution to reducing costs and improving patient outcomes with the intention of making reimbursement commensurate with adherence to these metrics. The authors describe existing metrics and their application to the practice of radiology, discuss the so-called value equation, and suggest possible metrics that will be useful for demonstrating the value of radiologists' services to their patients. (©)RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25839737     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  23 in total

1.  The numbers games.

Authors:  Øystein E Olsen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-12-21

2.  Development of data integration and visualization tools for the Department of Radiology to display operational and strategic metrics.

Authors:  Santiago Romero-Brufau; Petro Kostandy; Kayse Lee Maass; Phichet Wutthisirisart; Mustafa Sir; Brian Bartholmai; Mickael Stuve; Kalyan Pasupathy
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence for precision education in radiology.

Authors:  Michael Tran Duong; Andreas M Rauschecker; Jeffrey D Rudie; Po-Hao Chen; Tessa S Cook; R Nick Bryan; Suyash Mohan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Implementing Shared, Standardized Imaging Protocols to Improve Cross-Enterprise Workflow and Quality.

Authors:  Viswanathan Venkataraman; Travis Browning; Ivan Pedrosa; Suhny Abbara; David Fetzer; Seth Toomay; Ronald M Peshock
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Fetal dynamic phase-contrast MR angiography using ultrasound gating and comparison with Doppler ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  B P Schoennagel; J Yamamura; F Kording; R Fischer; P Bannas; G Adam; H Kooijman; C Ruprecht; K Fehrs; M Tavares de Sousa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Augmented Radiology: Looking Over the Horizon.

Authors:  Christie M Lincoln; Ritodhi Chatterjee; Marc H Willis
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-01-30

7.  Assessing the Training Costs and Work of Diagnostic Radiology Residents Using Key Performance Indicators - An Observational Study.

Authors:  Marta E Heilbrun; Brad Poss; Luca Boi; Yoshimi Anzai; Nan Hu; Robert S Kaplan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  Abbreviated MR Imaging for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Heacock; Alana A Lewin; Hildegard K Toth; Linda Moy; Beatriu Reig
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound: Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kapetas; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Georg J Wengert; Mathias Lazar; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Biopsy of the same organ within 30 days: a potential radiology performance measure.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Prasad R Shankar; Ellen Higgins; Angy Perez Martinez; Elizabeth Lee; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.