Maggie Yell1, Brenda L Muth, Dixon B Kaufman, Arjang Djamali, Thomas M Ellis. 1. 1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 2 Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 3 Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complement fixation by donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) is a primary mechanism for antibody-mediated damage of organ allografts. Using a recently developed kit that measures C1q binding to distinguish complement fixing and nonfixing antibodies, studies showed that C1q + DSAs have a higher risk of rejection and graft loss compared to C1q-DSA. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of the C1q-binding assay to identify clinically significant de novo DSA in renal transplant recipients and to define the properties of DSA that confer C1q binding ability. METHODS: The DSA-positive sera from 34 kidney recipients, 19 with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) + and 15 who were AMR-, were assayed in C1q-binding assays (C1q Screen; One Lambda, Inc. Canoga Park, CA). The correlation between C1q-binding activity, presence of AMR, DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values, and immunoglobulin G isotype was determined. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent (10/19) of sera from AMR+ patients had C1q + DSA, whereas only 13% (2/15) of sera from AMR- patients contained C1q + DSA. C1q + DSA exhibited significantly higher MFI values regardless of whether they were from AMR+ or AMR- patients (16,118 ± 6698 vs 6429 ± 4003; P < 0.0001). C1q + DSA converted to C1q - when diluted to a comparable MFI level as the C1q - DSA from AMR- patients, and some C1q - antibodies converted to C1q + when concentrated to MFI levels comparable to those observed for AMR+/C1q + sera. CONCLUSIONS: The C1q binding activity by de novo DSA in patients with AMR largely reflects differences in antibody strength. The C1q assay does not appear to distinguish functionally distinct DSA with clinical significance.
BACKGROUND: Complement fixation by donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) is a primary mechanism for antibody-mediated damage of organ allografts. Using a recently developed kit that measures C1q binding to distinguish complement fixing and nonfixing antibodies, studies showed that C1q + DSAs have a higher risk of rejection and graft loss compared to C1q-DSA. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of the C1q-binding assay to identify clinically significant de novo DSA in renal transplant recipients and to define the properties of DSA that confer C1q binding ability. METHODS: The DSA-positive sera from 34 kidney recipients, 19 with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) + and 15 who were AMR-, were assayed in C1q-binding assays (C1q Screen; One Lambda, Inc. Canoga Park, CA). The correlation between C1q-binding activity, presence of AMR, DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values, and immunoglobulin G isotype was determined. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent (10/19) of sera from AMR+ patients had C1q + DSA, whereas only 13% (2/15) of sera from AMR- patients contained C1q + DSA. C1q + DSA exhibited significantly higher MFI values regardless of whether they were from AMR+ or AMR- patients (16,118 ± 6698 vs 6429 ± 4003; P < 0.0001). C1q + DSA converted to C1q - when diluted to a comparable MFI level as the C1q - DSA from AMR- patients, and some C1q - antibodies converted to C1q + when concentrated to MFI levels comparable to those observed for AMR+/C1q + sera. CONCLUSIONS: The C1q binding activity by de novo DSA in patients with AMR largely reflects differences in antibody strength. The C1q assay does not appear to distinguish functionally distinct DSA with clinical significance.
Authors: James H Lan; David Gjertson; Ying Zheng; Stephanie Clark; Elaine F Reed; Michael J Cecka Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Antoine Roux; Kimberly A Thomas; Edouard Sage; Caroline Suberbielle-Boissel; Laurence Beaumont-Azuar; Francois Parquin; Morgan Le Guen; Nicholas Harre; Abdul Monem Hamid; Elaine F Reed Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2018-04-22 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: K Iwasaki; H Hamana; H Kishi; T Yamamoto; T Hiramitsu; M Okad; T Tomosugi; A Takeda; S Narumi; Y Watarai; Y Miwa; M Okumura; Y Matsuoka; K Horimi; A Muraguchi; T Kobayash Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 4.330