Literature DB >> 25839677

Predicting the origin of soil evidence: High throughput eukaryote sequencing and MIR spectroscopy applied to a crime scene scenario.

Jennifer M Young1, Laura S Weyrich2, James Breen2, Lynne M Macdonald3, Alan Cooper2.   

Abstract

Soil can serve as powerful trace evidence in forensic casework, because it is highly individualistic and can be characterised using a number of techniques. Complex soil matrixes can support a vast number of organisms that can provide a site-specific signal for use in forensic soil discrimination. Previous DNA fingerprinting techniques rely on variations in fragment length to distinguish between soil profiles and focus solely on microbial communities. However, the recent development of high throughput sequencing (HTS) has the potential to provide a more detailed picture of the soil community by accessing non-culturable microorganisms and by identifying specific bacteria, fungi, and plants within soil. To demonstrate the application of HTS to forensic soil analysis, 18S ribosomal RNA profiles of six forensic mock crime scene samples were compared to those collected from seven reference locations across South Australia. Our results demonstrate the utility of non-bacterial DNA to discriminate between different sites, and were able to link a soil to a particular location. In addition, HTS complemented traditional Mid Infrared (MIR) spectroscopy soil profiling, but was able to provide statistically stronger discriminatory power at a finer scale. Through the design of an experimental case scenario, we highlight the considerations and potential limitations of this method in forensic casework. We show that HTS analysis of soil eukaryotes was robust to environmental variation, e.g. rainfall and temperature, transfer effects, storage effects and spatial variation. In addition, this study utilises novel analytical methodologies to interpret results for investigative purposes and provides prediction statistics to support soil DNA analysis for evidential stages of a case.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  DNA; Forensic; High-throughput; MIR; Metagenomics; Soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25839677     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  6 in total

Review 1.  Microbiomes in forensic botany: a review.

Authors:  Sarah Ishak; Eleanor Dormontt; Jennifer M Young
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Bioinformatics Approach to Assess the Biogeographical Patterns of Soil Communities: The Utility for Soil Provenance.

Authors:  Natalie Damaso; Julian Mendel; Maria Mendoza; Eric J von Wettberg; Giri Narasimhan; DeEtta Mills
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Single Fragment or Bulk Soil DNA Metabarcoding: Which is Better for Characterizing Biological Taxa Found in Surface Soils for Sample Separation?

Authors:  Laura M Boggs; Melissa K R Scheible; Gustavo Machado; Kelly A Meiklejohn
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 4.  Forensic Applications of Microbiomics: A Review.

Authors:  Jake M Robinson; Zohar Pasternak; Christopher E Mason; Eran Elhaik
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Effectiveness of decontamination protocols when analyzing ancient DNA preserved in dental calculus.

Authors:  Andrew G Farrer; Sterling L Wright; Emily Skelly; Raphael Eisenhofer; Keith Dobney; Laura S Weyrich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Usefulness of Microbiome for Forensic Geolocation: A Review.

Authors:  Christian Haarkötter; María Saiz; Xiomara Gálvez; María Isabel Medina-Lozano; Juan Carlos Álvarez; José Antonio Lorente
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.