PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to verify a recently developed picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method by comparing reliabilities between real-size paper template and the PACS-photoshop methods in preoperative planning of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. METHODS: A prospective case series was conducted, including patients with medial osteoarthritis undergoing open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. In the preoperative planning, the picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method and real-size paper template method were used simultaneously in all patients. Preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, height, and angle of the osteotomy were evaluated. The reliability of this newly devised method was evaluated, and the consistency between the two methods was also evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Using the picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method, the mean correction angle and height of osteotomy gap of rater-1 were 11.7° ± 3.6° and 10.7 ± 3.6 mm, respectively. The mean correction angle and height of osteotomy gap of rater-2 were 12.0 ± 2.6 and 10.8 ± 3.6, respectively. The inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the correction angle were 0.956 ~ 0.979 and 0.980 ~ 0.992, respectively. The inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the height of the osteotomy gap were 0.968 ~ 0.985 and 0.971 ~ 0.994, respectively (p < 0.001). Using the real-size paper template method, the correction angle and height of the osteotomy gap were 11.5° ± 3.4° and 10.9 ± 3.8 mm, respectively. Using the picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method, mean values of the correction angle and height of the osteotomy gap were 11.9° ± 3.6° and 10.8 ± 3.6 mm, respectively. Consistency between the two methods by comparing the means of the correction angle and the height of the osteotomy gap were 0.985 and 0.985, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method enables direct measurement of the height of the osteotomy gap with high reliability.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to verify a recently developed picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method by comparing reliabilities between real-size paper template and the PACS-photoshop methods in preoperative planning of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. METHODS: A prospective case series was conducted, including patients with medial osteoarthritis undergoing open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. In the preoperative planning, the picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method and real-size paper template method were used simultaneously in all patients. Preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, height, and angle of the osteotomy were evaluated. The reliability of this newly devised method was evaluated, and the consistency between the two methods was also evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Using the picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method, the mean correction angle and height of osteotomy gap of rater-1 were 11.7° ± 3.6° and 10.7 ± 3.6 mm, respectively. The mean correction angle and height of osteotomy gap of rater-2 were 12.0 ± 2.6 and 10.8 ± 3.6, respectively. The inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the correction angle were 0.956 ~ 0.979 and 0.980 ~ 0.992, respectively. The inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the height of the osteotomy gap were 0.968 ~ 0.985 and 0.971 ~ 0.994, respectively (p < 0.001). Using the real-size paper template method, the correction angle and height of the osteotomy gap were 11.5° ± 3.4° and 10.9 ± 3.8 mm, respectively. Using the picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method, mean values of the correction angle and height of the osteotomy gap were 11.9° ± 3.6° and 10.8 ± 3.6 mm, respectively. Consistency between the two methods by comparing the means of the correction angle and the height of the osteotomy gap were 0.985 and 0.985, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the picture-archiving and communications system-photoshop method enables direct measurement of the height of the osteotomy gap with high reliability.
Authors: Steffen Schröter; Christoph Ihle; Johannes Mueller; Philipp Lobenhoffer; Ulrich Stöckle; Ronald van Heerwaarden Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-07-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Adrian V Specogna; Trevor B Birmingham; Jerome J DaSilva; Jaques S Milner; Jacqueline Kerr; Michael A Hunt; Ian C Jones; Thomas R Jenkyn; Peter J Fowler; J Robert Giffin Journal: J Knee Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Steffen Schröter; Christoph E Gonser; Lukas Konstantinidis; Peter Helwig; Dirk Albrecht Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Elizabeth A Sled; Lisa M Sheehy; David T Felson; Patrick A Costigan; Miu Lam; T Derek V Cooke Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Dae Kyung Bae; Young Wan Ko; Sang Jun Kim; Jong Hun Baek; Sang Jun Song Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: S Schröter; C Ihle; D W Elson; S Döbele; U Stöckle; A Ateschrang Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Dong-Il Chun; Jahyung Kim; Sung Hun Won; Jaeho Cho; Jeongku Ha; Minkyu Kil; Young Yi Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Man Soo Kim; In Jun Koh; Yong Gyu Sung; Dong Chul Park; Sung Bin Han; Yong In Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 2.362