Literature DB >> 21663721

High complication rate after biplanar open wedge high tibial osteotomy stabilized with a new spacer plate (Position HTO plate) without bone substitute.

Steffen Schröter1, Christoph E Gonser, Lukas Konstantinidis, Peter Helwig, Dirk Albrecht.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a prospective clinical and radiographic evaluation after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) using the new Position HTO plate (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) without bone transplantation.
METHODS: Thirty-five open wedge HTOs with the Position HTO plate were performed without bone wedges. The mean patient age was 44.6 ± 9.2 years at the time of osteotomy, which was planned with mediCAD II software (Hectec, Niederviehbach, Germany). The Hospital for Special Surgery score, Lysholm-Gillquist score, Tegner activity level, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score were used for clinical assessment. We evaluated radiographs obtained preoperatively and at 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using full-weight-bearing anteroposterior whole-leg views and anteroposterior and lateral views of the knee. For statistical analyses, JMP 8.0.1 (SAS, Cary, NC) was used.
RESULTS: We observed an overall complication rate of 34% and a plate-related complication rate of 23%. Plate-related complications included loss of correction, fracture of the tibial plateau, screw failure, malunion, and fracture of the lateral cortical bone. A significant difference in the mechanical tibiofemoral angle of -1.3° ± 1.4° (P < .001) was found between the follow-up at 2 and 6 months. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery score was 74.8 ± 11.7 preoperatively, and it increased to 87.8 ± 11.0 (P < .001). The mean score on the Lysholm-Gillquist knee functional scoring scale was 55.5 ± 21.7 preoperatively, and it improved to 73.0 ± 23.9 (P < .001). The Tegner activity level was 2.6 ± 0.9 preoperatively, and it improved significantly at final follow-up to 3.7 ± 1.8 (P < .02). The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score was 43.0 ± 14.9 preoperatively, and it increased to 66.1 ± 21 (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: We have shown a high plate-related complication rate and a significant loss of correction between 2 and 6 months of follow-up after open wedge HTO using the new Position HTO plate without bone wedges. The preoperatively planned mechanical tibiofemoral angle was not achieved. Despite these complications, the clinical outcome improved significantly. The Position HTO plate cannot be recommended with the presented technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21663721     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  37 in total

1.  Digital planning of high tibial osteotomy. Interrater reliability by using two different software.

Authors:  Steffen Schröter; Christoph Ihle; Johannes Mueller; Philipp Lobenhoffer; Ulrich Stöckle; Ronald van Heerwaarden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Locking plate versus non-locking plate in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae Hwi Han; Hyun Jung Kim; Jae Gwang Song; Jae Hyuk Yang; Ryuichi Nakamura; Daivesh Shah; Young Jee Park; Kyung Wook Nha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Complications of corrective osteotomies around the knee].

Authors:  M Holschen; P Lobenhoffer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Early full weight-bearing versus 6-week partial weight-bearing after open wedge high tibial osteotomy leads to earlier improvement of the clinical results: a prospective, randomised evaluation.

Authors:  S Schröter; A Ateschrang; W Löwe; H Nakayama; U Stöckle; C Ihle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Reliability of the imaging software in the preoperative planning of the open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Min Kyu Kim; Hae Won Byun; Sang Bum Kim; Jin Goo Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Critical comments to the publication "Hevesi M, Macalena JA, Wu IT, Camp CL, Levy BA, Arendt EA, et al. (2018) High tibial osteotomy with modern PEEK implants is safe and leads to lower hardware removal rates when compared to conventional metal fixation: a multi-center comparison study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1-11".

Authors:  Marc-Daniel Ahrend; Steffen Schröter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Critical comments and questions to the publication "Getgood A, Collins B, Slynarski K, Kurowska E, Parker D, Engebretsen L, MacDonald PB, Litchfield R 2011 Short-term safety and efficacy of a novel high tibial osteotomy system: a case controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc".

Authors:  S Schröter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Osteotomy around the knee: evolution, principles and results.

Authors:  J O Smith; A J Wilson; N P Thomas
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Return to work and clinical outcome after open wedge HTO.

Authors:  Steffen Schröter; Johannes Mueller; Ronald van Heerwaarden; Philipp Lobenhoffer; Ulrich Stöckle; Dirk Albrecht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: incidence of lateral cortex fractures and influence of fixation device on osteotomy healing.

Authors:  Julian Dexel; Hagen Fritzsche; Franziska Beyer; Melinda K Harman; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.