Literature DB >> 25836685

A study to establish international diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography.

J Vassileva1, M Rehani2, D Kostova-Lefterova3, H M Al-Naemi4, J S Al Suwaidi5, D Arandjic6, E H O Bashier7, S Kodlulovich Renha8, L El-Nachef9, J G Aguilar10, V Gershan11, E Gershkevitsh12, E Gruppetta13, A Hustuc14, A Jauhari15, Mohammad Hassan Kharita16, N Khelassi-Toutaoui17, H R Khosravi18, H Khoury19, I Kralik20, S Mahere21, J Mazuoliene22, P Mora23, W Muhogora24, P Muthuvelu25, D Nikodemova26, L Novak27, A Pallewatte28, D Pekarovič29, M Shaaban30, E Shelly31, K Stepanyan32, N Thelsy33, P Visrutaratna34, A Zaman35.   

Abstract

The article reports results from the largest international dose survey in paediatric computed tomography (CT) in 32 countries and proposes international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in terms of computed tomography dose index (CTDI vol) and dose length product (DLP). It also assesses whether mean or median values of individual facilities should be used. A total of 6115 individual patient data were recorded among four age groups: <1 y, >1-5 y, >5-10 y and >10-15 y. CTDIw, CTDI vol and DLP from the CT console were recorded in dedicated forms together with patient data and technical parameters. Statistical analysis was performed, and international DRLs were established at rounded 75th percentile values of distribution of median values from all CT facilities. The study presents evidence in favour of using median rather than mean of patient dose indices as the representative of typical local dose in a facility, and for establishing DRLs as third quartile of median values. International DRLs were established for paediatric CT examinations for routine head, chest and abdomen in the four age groups. DRLs for CTDI vol are similar to the reference values from other published reports, with some differences for chest and abdomen CT. Higher variations were observed between DLP values, based on a survey of whole multi-phase exams. It may be noted that other studies in literature were based on single phase only. DRLs reported in this article can be used in countries without sufficient medical physics support to identify non-optimised practice. Recommendations to improve the accuracy and importance of future surveys are provided.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25836685     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  9 in total

Review 1.  Review of the current status of radiation protection in diagnostic radiology in Africa.

Authors:  Wilbroad Muhogora; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-12

2.  Multicentre survey on patient dose in paediatric imaging and proposal for updated diagnostic reference levels for France. Part 1: computed tomography.

Authors:  David Célier; Patrice Roch; Cécile Etard; Hubert Ducou Le Pointe; Hervé J Brisse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Individual radiation exposure from computed tomography: a survey of paediatric practice in French university hospitals, 2010-2013.

Authors:  Neige M Y Journy; Serge Dreuil; Nathalie Boddaert; Jean-François Chateil; Didier Defez; Hubert Ducou-le-Pointe; Jean-Marc Garcier; Joël Guersen; Bouchra Habib Geryes; Andreas Jahnen; Choonsik Lee; Jacqueline Payen-de-la-Garanderie; Jean-Pierre Pracros; Dominique Sirinelli; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Analysis and results from a UK national dose audit of paediatric CT examinations.

Authors:  Mark Worrall; Mike Holubinka; Glafkos Havariyoun; Kirsten Hodgson; Sue Edyvean; John Holroyd; Anne Davis; Matthew Dunn; Anna Gardiner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Patient dose monitoring and the use of diagnostic reference levels for the optimization of protection in medical imaging: current status and challenges worldwide.

Authors:  Hannu Järvinen; Jenia Vassileva; Ehsan Samei; Anthony Wallace; Eliseo Vano; Madan Rehani
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-04

6.  Long-term experience and analysis of data on diagnostic reference levels: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Patrice Roch; David Célier; Cécile Dessaud; Cécile Etard; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Children's Environmental Health in Thailand: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Ratchaneewan Sinitkul; Chathaya Wongrathanandha; Somkiat Sirirattanapruk; Adisak Plitponkarnpim; Richard J Maude; Emma L Marczylo
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.462

8.  Paediatric diagnostic reference levels for common radiological examinations using the European guidelines.

Authors:  Anja Almén; Jónína Guðjónsdóttir; Nils Heimland; Britta Højgaard; Hanne Waltenburg; Anders Widmark
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Atul M Padole; Pallavi Sagar; Sjirk J Westra; Ruth Lim; Katherine Nimkin; Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael S Gee; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-09-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.