Literature DB >> 25836319

Standard methods based on last menstrual period dates misclassify and overestimate US preterm births.

C S Ambrose1, H Caspard1, C Rizzo1, E C Stepka2, G Keenan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare number of US preterm births based on obstetric versus last menstrual period (LMP) estimates and evaluate their correlations with clinical risk indicators associated with prematurity. STUDY
DESIGN: Preterm births were assessed from LMP, per standard practice, and, separately, from obstetric estimates using the 2012 Natality Public Use File. Percentages of infants with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and low birth weight (LBW) were calculated. RESULT: More births were <37 weeks gestational age (GA) by reported LMP (11.4%) versus obstetric estimates (9.5%). Among infants preterm by LMP, but born at 37-41 weeks by obstetric estimates, there were 5.7% NICU admission and 7.7% LBW rates versus 25.2% and 35.4%, respectively, of those preterm by obstetric estimates but born 37-41 weeks by LMP assessments.
CONCLUSION: Obstetric estimates provide the most clinically relevant estimates of US preterm births. Assessments calculated from LMP alone may overestimate prematurity incidence by ~20%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25836319     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2015.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  11 in total

1.  Fighting for the next generation: US Prematurity in 2030.

Authors:  Edward R B McCabe; Gerard E Carrino; Rebecca B Russell; Jennifer L Howse
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Epidemiology of preterm birth.

Authors:  Janet Tucker; William McGuire
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-18

3.  Comparison of two measures of gestational age among low income births. The potential impact on health studies, New York, 2005.

Authors:  Victoria Lazariu; Christopher F Davis; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-01

4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: Ultrasonography in pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Evaluation of gestational age estimate method on the calculation of preterm birth rates.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Alonzo T Folger; Elizabeth A Kelly; Beena Devi Kamath-Rayne
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

Review 6.  Gestational age estimation on United States livebirth certificates: a historical overview.

Authors:  Megan L Wier; Michelle Pearl; Martin Kharrazi
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age.

Authors:  William M Callaghan; Patricia M Dietz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Alfred Z Abuhamad; Deborah Levine; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.

Authors:  Patricia M Dietz; Lucinda J England; William M Callaghan; Michelle Pearl; Megan L Wier; Martin Kharrazi
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Variation between last-menstrual-period and clinical estimates of gestational age in vital records.

Authors:  Cheng Qin; Jason Hsia; Cynthia J Berg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  8 in total

1.  Quantifying bias between reported last menstrual period and ultrasonography estimates of gestational age in Lusaka, Zambia.

Authors:  Joan T Price; Jennifer Winston; Bellington Vwalika; Stephen R Cole; Marie C D Stoner; Mwansa K Lubeya; Andrew Kumwenda; Jeffrey S A Stringer
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes after invasive Group B Streptococcus in early infancy: A multi-country matched cohort study in South Africa, Mozambique, India, Kenya, and Argentina.

Authors:  Proma Paul; Jaya Chandna; Simon R Procter; Ziyaad Dangor; Shannon Leahy; Sridhar Santhanam; Hima B John; Quique Bassat; Justina Bramugy; Azucena Bardají; Amina Abubakar; Carophine Nasambu; Romina Libster; Clara Sánchez Yanotti; Farah Seedat; Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó; A K M Tanvir Hossain; Qazi Sadeq-Ur Rahman; Mark Jit; Charles R Newton; Kate Milner; Bronner P Gonçalves; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Statistical Power to Detect an Association Between Guideline-based Palivizumab Administration and Hospitalizations for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections.

Authors:  Christopher S Ambrose
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Adverse birth outcomes and their clinical phenotypes in an urban Zambian cohort.

Authors:  Joan T Price; Bellington Vwalika; Katelyn J Rittenhouse; Humphrey Mwape; Jennifer Winston; Bethany L Freeman; Ntazana Sindano; Elizabeth M Stringer; Margaret P Kasaro; Benjamin H Chi; Jeffrey Sa Stringer
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2020-01-24

5.  Evaluation of recent New Vaccine Surveillance Network data regarding respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization rates in US preterm infants.

Authors:  John P DeVincenzo; Christopher S Ambrose; Doris Makari; Leonard B Weiner
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Modeling the Potential Impact of the 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prophylaxis Guidance on Preterm Infant RSV Outcomes.

Authors:  Kimmie K McLaurin; Archana Chatterjee; Doris Makari
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2015-10-26

7.  Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar.

Authors:  Isabel Fulcher; Kaya Hedt; Stella Marealle; Jalia Tibaijuka; Omar Abdalla; Rachel Hofmann; Erica Layer; Marc Mitchell; Bethany Hedt-Gauthier
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Adequate antenatal care and ethnicity affect preterm birth in pregnant women living in the tropical rainforest of Suriname.

Authors:  G K Baldewsingh; B C Jubitana; E D van Eer; A Shankar; A D Hindori-Mohangoo; H H Covert; L Shi; M Y Lichtveld; C W R Zijlmans
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.105

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.