Literature DB >> 18182378

Variation between last-menstrual-period and clinical estimates of gestational age in vital records.

Cheng Qin1, Jason Hsia, Cynthia J Berg.   

Abstract

An accurate assessment of gestational age is vital to population-based research and surveillance in maternal and infant health. However, the quality of gestational age measurements derived from birth certificates has been in question. Using the 2002 US public-use natality file, the authors examined the agreement between estimates of gestational age based on the last menstrual period (LMP) and clinical estimates in vital records across durations of gestation and US states and explored reasons for disagreement. Agreement between the LMP and the clinical estimate of gestational age varied substantially across gestations and among states. Preterm births were more likely than term births to have disagreement between the two estimates. Maternal age, maternal education, initiation of prenatal care, order of livebirth, and use of ultrasound had significant independent effects on the disagreement between the two measures, regardless of gestational age, but these factors made little difference in the magnitude of gestational age group differences. Information available on birth certificates was not sufficient to understand this disparity. The lowest agreement between the LMP and the clinical estimate was observed among preterm infants born at 28-36 weeks' gestation, who accounted for more than 90% of total preterm births. This finding deserves particular attention and further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18182378     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of two measures of gestational age among low income births. The potential impact on health studies, New York, 2005.

Authors:  Victoria Lazariu; Christopher F Davis; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-01

2.  Evaluation of gestational age estimate method on the calculation of preterm birth rates.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Alonzo T Folger; Elizabeth A Kelly; Beena Devi Kamath-Rayne
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

3.  Standard methods based on last menstrual period dates misclassify and overestimate US preterm births.

Authors:  C S Ambrose; H Caspard; C Rizzo; E C Stepka; G Keenan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Effect of revised IOM weight gain guidelines on perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Donna R Halloran; Terry C Wall; Camelia Guild; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-07-01

5.  Quantifying bias between reported last menstrual period and ultrasonography estimates of gestational age in Lusaka, Zambia.

Authors:  Joan T Price; Jennifer Winston; Bellington Vwalika; Stephen R Cole; Marie C D Stoner; Mwansa K Lubeya; Andrew Kumwenda; Jeffrey S A Stringer
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Calculating length of gestation from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) database versus vital records may alter reported rates of prematurity.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Eugene Declercq; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Adverse Infant Outcomes Associated with Discordant Gestational Age Estimates.

Authors:  Nils-Halvdan Morken; Rolv Skjaerven; Jennifer L Richards; Michael R Kramer; Sven Cnattingius; Stefan Johansson; Mika Gissler; Siobhan M Dolan; Jennifer Zeitlin; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Pre-pregnancy body mass index change between pregnancies and preterm birth in the following pregnancy.

Authors:  Aimin Chen; Mark A Klebanoff; Olga Basso
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Prenatal care utilization in Mississippi: racial disparities and implications for unfavorable birth outcomes.

Authors:  Reagan G Cox; Lei Zhang; Marianne E Zotti; Juanita Graham
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-10

10.  Racial disparities in pregnancy outcomes in obese women.

Authors:  Nicole E Marshall; Camelia Guild; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey; Donna R Halloran
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.