| Literature DB >> 25835473 |
Shin Ohtani1, Akira Ushiyama2, Machiko Maeda1, Yuki Ogasawara1, Jianqing Wang3, Naoki Kunugita4, Kazuyuki Ishii1.
Abstract
With the widespread use of radio-frequency devices, it is increasingly important to understand the biological effects of the associated electromagnetic fields. Thus, we investigated the effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on T cell responses during development due to the lack of science-based evidence for RF-EMF effects on developmental immune systems. Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were exposed to 2.14-GHz wideband code division multiple-access (W-CDMA) RF signals at a whole-body specific absorption rate (SAR) of 0.2 W/kg. Exposures were performed for a total of 9 weeks spanning in utero development, lactation and the juvenile period. Rats were continuously exposed to RF-EMF for 20 h/day, 7 days/week. Comparisons of control and exposed rats using flow cytometry revealed no changes in the numbers of CD4/CD8 T cells, activated T cells or regulatory T cells among peripheral blood cells, splenocytes and thymocytes. Expression levels of 16 genes that regulate the immunological Th1/Th2 paradigm were analyzed using real-time PCR in the spleen and thymus tissues of control and RF-EMF-exposed rats. Although only the Il5 gene was significantly regulated in spleen tissues, Il4, Il5 and Il23a genes were significantly upregulated in thymus tissues following exposure to RF-EMF. However, ELISAs showed no changes in serum IL-4 protein concentrations. These data indicate no adverse effects of long-term RF-EMF exposure on immune-like T cell populations, T cell activation, or Th1/Th2 balance in developing rats, although significant transcriptional effects were observed.Entities:
Keywords: RF-EMF exposure in vivo; T cell subset analyses; Th1/Th2 balance; developmental stage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25835473 PMCID: PMC4426920 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rru126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Radiat Res ISSN: 0449-3060 Impact factor: 2.724
Fig. 1.Schedule of RF-EMF exposure. Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were exposed to RF-EMF for a total of 9 weeks. In brief, 10-week-old female proestrus rats were screened using an Impedance Checker after mating with 10-week-old male rats. Accurate calculation of whole-body SARs allowed the exposure of RF-EMF under the following conditions: one dam per cage from mating to birth, one dam and eight pups per cage from birth to weaning, and four pups after weaning.
Primers for 16 genes that are associated with the Th1/Th2 paradigm
| Gene | Forward sequence (5′→3′) | Reverse sequence (5′→3′) |
|---|---|---|
| TGATGTACCTCCGTGCTTGA | GTGAGTTCAGACCGCTGACA | |
| GCATAGAGGCCTTTCAGCAC | TAGCTCCGAAGACAGCGTTT | |
| GCCTGCGGACTCTACCATAA | CACAGGAAGTCCCTGCTCTC | |
| AAGAGAAGTGTGGCGAAGAG | CAGACTTCCATTGCCCACTC | |
| GAATTCCCTGGGAGAGAAGC | GCTCCACTGCCTTGCTTTTA | |
| GCCCTCTCTGGCTGTTACTG | CCAAGAGGAGGCTCTTTCCT | |
| GACAAAACCAGCACACTGGA | CTACCAAGGCACAGGGTCAT | |
| GCACAGAAACACGGACTTGA | GACAGAGATGCTCGTCCACA | |
| ATCTTCCAATGGGAGCCTCT | GCCCTCGTTTCCTTTACTCC | |
| GGAAGCGAAGACAGCAGAGT | GCTCTCTGCAACAATGGTGA | |
| CCGTGACTGCCTACCAGAAT | GTTGACAGTTGGGTCCAGGT | |
| TGCCTCAGCCTCTTCTCATT | GAGCCCATTTGGGAACTTCT | |
| TGAGTGGCTGTCTTTTGACG | ACTGAAGCGAAAGCCCTGTA | |
| CCGGAGAGGAGACTTCACAG | CAGAATTGCCATTGCACAAC | |
| TCCAGTGTGGTGATGGTTGT | TAGAGAAGGCTCCCCTGTGA | |
| ACAAGCTCATCCCGTACCAG | AGTACCGCTGCCTTCACTGT | |
| ATGACTCTACCCACGGCAAG | TACTCAGCACCAGCATCACC | |
| GCTCTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTT | CGGATGTCAACGTCACACTT |
T cell subpopulation frequencies in flow cytometry
| Blood | Spleen | Thymus | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Av. (%) | ±S.D. | Av. (%) | ±S.D. | Av. (%) | ±S.D. | ||
| CD4+CD8− | Sham | 66.74 | 3.20 | 40.45 | 3.19 | 55.79 | 4.40 |
| Expose | 66.59 | 2.85 | 42.74 | 3.69 | 54.19 | 3.90 | |
| CD4−CD8+ | Sham | 30.45 | 3.41 | 46.74 | 4.72 | 13.81 | 1.94 |
| Expose | 30.31 | 2.45 | 42.83 | 4.32 | 14.32 | 2.06 | |
| CD4+CD8+ | Sham | 1.85 | 0.43 | 2.16 | 0.23 | 28.70 | 4.64 |
| Expose | 1.90 | 0.23 | 2.11 | 0.24 | 29.72 | 4.26 | |
| CD4−CD8− | Sham | 0.97 | 0.33 | 10.68 | 4.75 | 1.84 | 0.34 |
| Expose | 1.21 | 1.37 | 12.36 | 4.59 | 1.97 | 0.48 | |
| CD4+CD25+ | Sham | 2.03 | 0.35 | 2.25 | 0.35 | 23.11 | 5.30 |
| Expose | 2.01 | 0.45 | 2.28 | 0.27 | 20.38 | 9.08 | |
| CD4+CD28+ | Sham | 39.07 | 3.98 | 21.36 | 3.22 | 90.29 | 0.78 |
| Expose | 40.55 | 6.84 | 21.27 | 2.26 | 90.70 | 1.22 | |
| CD80+ | Sham | 15.50 | 5.12 | 9.83 | 2.54 | 0.23 | 0.09 |
| Expose | 11.42 | 5.02 | 7.85 | 2.13 | 0.29 | 0.08 | |
| CD86+ | Sham | 32.21 | 6.43 | 14.86 | 1.91 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
| Expose | 29.98 | 7.01 | 14.00 | 2.40 | 0.17 | 0.07 | |
Relative mRNA expression levels in RF-EMF-exposed and sham-exposed rats
| Gene | Spleen | Thymus |
|---|---|---|
| ↑ (1.82*) | ||
| ↑ (1.53**) | ↑ (1.65*) | |
| ↑ (1.72*) | ||
Significant changes in gene expression in RF-EMF-exposed rats are shown by arrows, and the relative ratios are shown in parentheses; *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01.
Fig. 2.Serum concentrations of IL-4 in control and RF-EMF–exposed rats. Cytokine concentrations were analyzed using ELISA. Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of eight mice per group; P > 0.05 for comparisons of IL-4 between control (sham-exposure).