| Literature DB >> 25835445 |
Aida M Bertoli-Avella1, Elisabeth Gillis2, Hiroko Morisaki3, Judith M A Verhagen4, Bianca M de Graaf4, Gerarda van de Beek2, Elena Gallo5, Boudewijn P T Kruithof6, Hanka Venselaar7, Loretha A Myers5, Steven Laga8, Alexander J Doyle9, Gretchen Oswald10, Gert W A van Cappellen11, Itaru Yamanaka12, Robert M van der Helm4, Berna Beverloo4, Annelies de Klein4, Luba Pardo13, Martin Lammens14, Christina Evers15, Koenraad Devriendt16, Michiel Dumoulein17, Janneke Timmermans18, Hennie T Bruggenwirth4, Frans Verheijen4, Inez Rodrigus8, Gareth Baynam19, Marlies Kempers20, Johan Saenen21, Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck21, Kenji Minatoya22, Ritsu Matsukawa23, Takuro Tsukube23, Noriaki Kubo24, Robert Hofstra4, Marie Jose Goumans6, Jos A Bekkers25, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink26, Ingrid M B H van de Laar4, Harry C Dietz27, Lut Van Laer2, Takayuki Morisaki28, Marja W Wessels4, Bart L Loeys29.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aneurysms affecting the aorta are a common condition associated with high mortality as a result of aortic dissection or rupture. Investigations of the pathogenic mechanisms involved in syndromic types of thoracic aortic aneurysms, such as Marfan and Loeys-Dietz syndromes, have revealed an important contribution of disturbed transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling.Entities:
Keywords: Loeys-Dietz syndrome; TGF-β pathway; gene; thoracic aortic aneurysm
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25835445 PMCID: PMC4380321 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol ISSN: 0735-1097 Impact factor: 24.094
Figure 1Overview of Families With TGFB3 Mutations
The causal TGFB3 mutation is shown for each family. Probands are indicated with an arrow. Circle: female; square: male; open symbol: unaffected; solid symbol: affected; diagonal line: deceased; brackets: adopted; question mark: clinical affection status unknown. Plus and minus signs indicate presence or absence of a TGFB3 mutation, respectively.
Figure 2Phenotypic Characteristics of Patients With a TGFB3 Mutation
Observed clinical features include: long face (1-III:11, 5-II:1, 7-II:1, 8-II:1); pectus carinatum (1-IV:2); hypertelorism (2-III:7, 2-IV:2, 2-IV:3, 7-II:1, 8-II:1); bifid uvula (2-III:7, 2-IV:3, 7-II:1); joint hypermobility (2-IV:2); arachnodactyly (5-II:1); and metatarsus adductus (8-III:1). All affected individuals or parents gave permission to publish these photographs.
Figure 3Mutation Overview of the TGFB3 Gene
Exons are represented by rectangles. Exon numbering is given, and different colors denote the different protein domains. Mutations found in this study are indicated below the gene in the respective domains. Evolutionary conservation in TGFB3 and its related proteins is given for the 4 missense mutations (p.Arg300Trp: Family 2, 4, 5 and 11; p.Asp263His: Family 3; p.Leu401Pro: Family 8; p.Ile322Thr: Family 10). Previously published mutations are shown above the gene, with a single degree symbol indicating mutation described in Matyas et al. (17) and double degree symbols indicating mutation from Rienhoff et al. (16).
Figure 4Overview of the TGFB3 Dimer Model and Mutations
One monomer is shown in grey, with the other monomer in cyan (LAP domain) and blue (TGFB3 domain). Residues deleted by the p.Glu216_Lys251del mutation are in purple. Residues affected by the p.Leu386Argfs21* mutation are in yellow (note that this mutation also adds 21 different residues that cannot be modeled). Residues deleted by the p.Tyr365* mutation are shown in orange and yellow (note that this mutation deletes all residues following Tyr365). Residues deleted by mutation p.Asn235Metfs*11 are shown in grey-olive in the second monomer (note that this mutation also adds 11 different new residues, which cannot be modeled). The point mutations p.Asp263His, p.Arg300Trp, p.Ile322Thr, and p.Leu401Pro are shown in red with their side chains visible as red spheres. A detailed close-up of these mutations is shown in 4 extra panels. In these panels, the wild-type residue side chain is in green, whereas the mutant side chain is in red. For the p.Arg300Trp mutation, side chains of nearby negative residues are also shown. For the p.Leu401Pro mutation, nearby hydrophobic residues are shown.
Patient Characteristics
| Affected Individuals (n = 43) | |
|---|---|
| Sex, M/F | 23/20 |
| Age, yrs | 34 (3–74) |
| Age at death, yrs | 56 (40–80) |
| Age at dissection, yrs | 47.5 (30–80) |
| Cardiovascular findings | |
| Type A dissections, age, yrs | 4 (51; 40–80) |
| Type B dissections, age, yrs | 6 (44.5; 30–57) |
| Aortic aneurysm | 6 (34; 3–68) |
| Abdominal aortic surgery | 2 |
| Disease beyond aorta | 3 |
| Skeletal findings | |
| Tall stature | 12 |
| Arachnodactyly | 16 |
| Pectus deformity | 8 |
| Kyphoscoliosis | 11 |
| Joint hypermobility | 9 |
| Loeys-Dietz features | |
| Hypertelorism | 14 |
| Bifid uvula | 11 |
| Cleft palate | 5 |
Values are n, median (range), or n (median; range).
Not all patients were evaluated for all features.
Four aneurysms affected the sinuses of Valsalva, and 2 only affected the ascending aorta.
Surgery was performed on 1 patient at age 43 years and 1 at 50 years.
Cerebral, iliac, or subclavian arteries (n = 1 for each location).
Comparison of Phenotypical Characteristics of Patients With TGFBR1/2, SMAD3, TGFB2, and TGFB3 Mutations
| Phenotype | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertelorism | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bifid uvula/cleft palate | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Exotropia | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Craniosynostosis | ✓ | ✓ | × | × |
| Cervical spine instability | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ |
| Retrognathia surgery | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scoliosis/spondylolisthesis | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Clubfoot | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Osteoarthritis | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ |
| Dural ectasia | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? |
| Pneumothorax | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × |
| Hernia | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dissection at young age | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? |
| Disease beyond root | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cerebral hemorrhage | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Arterial tortuosity | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × |
| Autoimmune findings | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
A check mark indicates presence of the clinical feature, an X indicates absence of the clinical feature, and a question mark indicates presence of a clinical feature is unknown.
Figure 5Cardiovascular Pathology and Immunohistochemical Analysis of TGFB Family Proteins in a Human Subject With TGFB3 Mutation (3-III:1; p.Asp263His)
(A) Masson trichrome staining shows increased deposition of collagen (dark blue) and loss of smooth muscle fibers (red) in the media. (B) Elastin stain (Elastica van Gieson) shows loss of elastin fibers (black). (C) Hematoxylin-eosin staining shows deposition of proteoglycan (light blue) in the media. (A–C) Scale bar indicates 2 mm. (D–F) Cross sections of the media of the aortic wall of patient 3-III:1 and a matched control. Red staining corresponds to pSmad2 (D); pERK (E); and TGFB1 (F). Scale bars indicate 50 μm (D–E), 20 μm (F). Blue staining shows cell nuclei (DAPI), colocalization is purple. Red staining not colocalized with DAPI is nonspecific.
Central IllustrationThe Pathway From Patient to Gene and Back
The figure summarizes how initial identification of patients and families, followed by linkage and mutation analysis led to the discovery of TGFB3 mutations. Further exploration of the TGF-β pathway allowed a better phenotypical delineation and characterization that will have implications in personalized clinical management.