Literature DB >> 25832698

Lung cancer cell line screen links fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway defects to increased relative biological effectiveness of proton radiation.

Qi Liu1, Priyanjali Ghosh1, Nicole Magpayo1, Mauro Testa2, Shikui Tang2, Liliana Gheorghiu1, Peter Biggs2, Harald Paganetti2, Jason A Efstathiou1, Hsiao-Ming Lu2, Kathryn D Held1, Henning Willers3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Growing knowledge of genomic heterogeneity in cancer, especially when it results in altered DNA damage responses, requires re-examination of the generic relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 of protons. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For determination of cellular radiosensitivity, we irradiated 17 lung cancer cell lines at the mid-spread-out Bragg peak of a clinical proton beam (linear energy transfer, 2.5 keV/μm). For comparison, 250-kVp X rays and (137)Cs γ-rays were used. To estimate the RBE of protons relative to (60)Co (Co60eq), we assigned an RBE(Co60Eq) of 1.1 to X rays to correct the physical dose measured. Standard DNA repair foci assays were used to monitor damage responses. FANCD2 was depleted using RNA interference.
RESULTS: Five lung cancer cell lines (29.4%) exhibited reduced clonogenic survival after proton irradiation compared with X-irradiation with the same physical doses. This was confirmed in a 3-dimensional sphere assay. Corresponding proton RBE(Co60Eq) estimates were statistically significantly different from 1.1 (P≤.05): 1.31 to 1.77 (for a survival fraction of 0.5). In 3 of these lines, increased RBE was correlated with alterations in the Fanconi anemia (FA)/BRCA pathway of DNA repair. In Calu-6 cells, the data pointed toward an FA pathway defect, leading to a previously unreported persistence of proton-induced RAD51 foci. The FA/BRCA-defective cells displayed a 25% increase in the size of subnuclear 53BP1 foci 18 hours after proton irradiation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our cell line screen has revealed variations in proton RBE that are partly due to FA/BRCA pathway defects, suggesting that the use of a generic RBE for cancers should be revisited. We propose that functional biomarkers, such as size of residual 53BP1 foci, may be used to identify cancers with increased sensitivity to proton radiation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25832698     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.12.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  47 in total

1.  Developing Predictive or Prognostic Biomarkers for Charged Particle Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael D Story; Jing Wang
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018

2.  Radiogenomic Predictors of Adverse Effects following Charged Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Lindsay M Morton; Luisel Ricks-Santi; Catharine M L West; Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  Comparison of human lung cancer cell radiosensitivity after irradiations with therapeutic protons and carbon ions.

Authors:  Otilija D Keta; Danijela V Todorović; Tanja M Bulat; Pablo Ga Cirrone; Francesco Romano; Giacomo Cuttone; Ivan M Petrović; Aleksandra M Ristić Fira
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-09-15

4.  Proliferation of Double-Strand Break-Resistant Polyploid Cells Requires Drosophila FANCD2.

Authors:  Heidi S Bretscher; Donald T Fox
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 5.  Proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE): a multiscale problem.

Authors:  Tracy Sa Underwood; Stephen J McMahon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Cancer Cell Metabolism: Implications for X-ray and Particle Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Mathieu Sertorio; John P Perentesis; Ralph E Vatner; Anthony E Mascia; Yi Zheng; Susanne I Wells
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 7.  Combined Treatment Modalities for High-Energy Proton Irradiation: Exploiting Specific DNA Repair Dependencies.

Authors:  Simon Deycmar; Martin Pruschy
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 8.  Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Disruption of SLX4-MUS81 Function Increases the Relative Biological Effectiveness of Proton Radiation.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Tracy S A Underwood; Jong Kung; Meng Wang; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Harald Paganetti; Kathryn D Held; Theodore S Hong; Jason A Efstathiou; Henning Willers
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  DNA Damage Response Assessments in Human Tumor Samples Provide Functional Biomarkers of Radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Henning Willers; Liliana Gheorghiu; Qi Liu; Jason A Efstathiou; Lori J Wirth; Mechthild Krause; Cläre von Neubeck
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.