Literature DB >> 25832473

Comparison of lisdexamfetamine and dextroamphetamine exposures reported to U.S. poison centers.

Mingzohn Ellen Kaland1, Wendy Klein-Schwartz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Lisdexamfetamine is a pro-drug stimulant that requires the enzymatic hydrolysis of lysine from dexamphetamine for pharmacologic effects. There is limited information comparing non-therapeutic lisdexamfetamine and dextroamphetamine exposures.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare lisdexamfetamine exposures with dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release.
METHODS: A retrospective observational case series of single-substance exposures to lisdexamfetamine, dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release, or dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release reported to the National Poison Data System from 2007 to 2012 was performed. Data were analyzed for demographics, reason, clinical effects, management site, and outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 23,553 exposures: lisdexamfetamine (7,113), dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release (6,245), and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release (10,195). The most frequent clinical effects observed for lisdexamfetamine, dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release, and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release were agitation (19.8%, 21.7%, and 25.1%, respectively) and tachycardia (19.2%, 22.8%, and 23.9%, respectively). The reason was most often exploratory (93.4%) in children < 6 years and therapeutic error (65.6%) in children aged 6-12 years. In adolescents and adults most common reasons were suicide attempts (28.4%) followed by abuse (19.5%) and therapeutic errors (18.8%). Overall, 61.6% of cases were managed in a health care facility, with the majority treated in the emergency department only. The majority of cases (76.0%) experienced no or minor effects. More serious outcomes (moderate/major/death) occurred in 21.2% of lisdexamfetamine, 24.7% of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release, and 25.5% of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release. There were 4 deaths (1 dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release and 3 dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release). In patients aged 6 years and more, abuse/misuse was more frequently reported for dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release (32.5%) and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release (23.0%) than that for lisdexamfetamine (13.5%). The odds of abuse/misuse was 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-2.4) times higher for dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release than that for lisdexamfetamine and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release combined; the odds of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release abuse/misuse was 1.9 (95% CI: 1.7-2.2) times higher than lisdexamfetamine. In 2011, the number of lisdexamfetamine abuse/misuse cases exceeded dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release by approximately 26% and plateaued in 2012, but was significantly lower (∼75%) than dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release.
CONCLUSIONS: Toxic effects were similar for all three drugs. Although the majority of cases were treated at health care facilities, the majority of patients experienced no effects or minor toxicity. Serious outcomes occurred in approximately 21% of lisdexamfetamine and 25% of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release. Lisdexamfetamine may have less abuse potential, especially compared with the immediate-release dextroamphetamine/amphetamine formulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADHD; Abuse; Overdose; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25832473     DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1027903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-3650            Impact factor:   4.467


  10 in total

1.  An Infant with a Prolonged Sympathomimetic Toxidrome after Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Ingestion.

Authors:  Kelly E Wood; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-08

2.  Acute effects of lisdexamfetamine and D-amphetamine on social cognition and cognitive performance in a placebo-controlled study in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Patrick C Dolder; Petra Strajhar; Patrick Vizeli; Alex Odermatt; Matthias E Liechti
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Attenuation of cocaine self-administration by chronic oral phendimetrazine in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  P W Czoty; B E Blough; T R Fennell; R W Snyder; M A Nader
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  Converging vulnerability factors for compulsive food and drug use.

Authors:  Katherine M Serafine; Laura E O'Dell; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.273

5.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lisdexamfetamine Compared with D-Amphetamine in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Patrick C Dolder; Petra Strajhar; Patrick Vizeli; Felix Hammann; Alex Odermatt; Matthias E Liechti
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  A case series involving young children presenting with accidental ingestion of amphetamine based stimulants.

Authors:  Kelly E Wood; Patrick J McCarthy; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2018-11-03

7.  Accidental intoxications in toddlers: lack of cross-reactivity of vilazodone and its urinary metabolite M17 with drug of abuse screening immunoassays.

Authors:  Christina D Martinez-Brokaw; Joshua B Radke; Joshua G Pierce; Alexandra Ehlers; Sean Ekins; Kelly E Wood; Jon Maakestad; Jacqueline A Rymer; Kenichi Tamama; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2019-02-18

8.  Rise, and pronounced regional variation, in methylphenidate, amphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine distribution in the United States.

Authors:  Sneha M Vaddadi; Nicholas J Czelatka; Belsy D Gutierrez; Bhumika C Maddineni; Kenneth L McCall; Brian J Piper
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: Prodrug Delivery, Amphetamine Exposure and Duration of Efficacy.

Authors:  James C Ermer; Michael Pennick; Glen Frick
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.859

10.  Trends in use of prescription stimulants in the United States and Territories, 2006 to 2016.

Authors:  Brian J Piper; Christy L Ogden; Olapeju M Simoyan; Daniel Y Chung; James F Caggiano; Stephanie D Nichols; Kenneth L McCall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.