Patrick C Dolder1, Petra Strajhar2, Patrick Vizeli1, Alex Odermatt2, Matthias E Liechti3. 1. Psychopharmacology Research, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4056, Basel, CH, Switzerland. 2. Division of Molecular and Systems Toxicology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 3. Psychopharmacology Research, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4056, Basel, CH, Switzerland. matthias.liechti@usb.ch.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Amphetamines are used as medications but are also misused as cognitive enhancers by healthy subjects and may have additional effects on social cognition. METHODS: We investigated the acute effects of single, high, equimolar doses of D-amphetamine (40 mg) and lisdexamfetamine (100 mg) on social cognition and cognitive performance using a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over design in 24 healthy volunteers. Effects on social cognition were assessed using the Facial Emotion Recognition Task (FERT), Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET), and Sexual Arousal Task (SAT). Cognitive performance was measured using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Digit Span (DS), Stop-Signal Task (SST), and Mackworth Clock Test (MCT). RESULTS:D-Amphetamine and lisdexamfetamine had small effects on measures of social cognition. There were no effects on emotion recognition on the FERT. D-Amphetamine increased direct empathy on the MET, but only for positive stimuli. Both amphetamines increased ratings of pleasantness and attractiveness on the SAT in response to sexual but also to neutral stimuli. D-Amphetamine and lisdexamfetamine increased cognitive performance (go-accuracy and vigilance on the SST and MCT, respectively). Lisdexamfetamine increased processing speed on the DSST. Neither drug had an effect on the DS. CONCLUSION: Single, high, equimolar doses of D-amphetamine and lisdexamfetamine enhanced certain aspects of cognitive performance in healthy non-sleep-deprived subjects. Both amphetamines also slightly altered aspects of social cognition. Whether these small effects also influence social interaction behavior in amphetamine users remains to be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02668926).
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Amphetamines are used as medications but are also misused as cognitive enhancers by healthy subjects and may have additional effects on social cognition. METHODS: We investigated the acute effects of single, high, equimolar doses of D-amphetamine (40 mg) and lisdexamfetamine (100 mg) on social cognition and cognitive performance using a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over design in 24 healthy volunteers. Effects on social cognition were assessed using the Facial Emotion Recognition Task (FERT), Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET), and Sexual Arousal Task (SAT). Cognitive performance was measured using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Digit Span (DS), Stop-Signal Task (SST), and Mackworth Clock Test (MCT). RESULTS:D-Amphetamine and lisdexamfetamine had small effects on measures of social cognition. There were no effects on emotion recognition on the FERT. D-Amphetamine increased direct empathy on the MET, but only for positive stimuli. Both amphetamines increased ratings of pleasantness and attractiveness on the SAT in response to sexual but also to neutral stimuli. D-Amphetamine and lisdexamfetamine increased cognitive performance (go-accuracy and vigilance on the SST and MCT, respectively). Lisdexamfetamine increased processing speed on the DSST. Neither drug had an effect on the DS. CONCLUSION: Single, high, equimolar doses of D-amphetamine and lisdexamfetamine enhanced certain aspects of cognitive performance in healthy non-sleep-deprived subjects. Both amphetamines also slightly altered aspects of social cognition. Whether these small effects also influence social interaction behavior in amphetamine users remains to be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02668926).
Entities:
Keywords:
Cognitive performance; D-Amphetamine; Lisdexamfetamine; Sexual arousal; Social cognition
Authors: Nora D Volkow; Gene-Jack Wang; Joanna S Fowler; Frank Telang; Millard Jayne; Christopher Wong Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Francisco Aguilar de Arcos; Antonio Verdejo Garcia; Angeles Lopez Jimenez; Matilde Montañez Pareja; Encarnacion Gomez Juarez; Francisco Arraez Sanchez; Miguel Perez Garcia Journal: Adicciones Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: L D Simmler; T A Buser; M Donzelli; Y Schramm; L-H Dieu; J Huwyler; S Chaboz; M C Hoener; M E Liechti Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Martin H Zack; Daniela S Lobo; Candice Biback; Tim Fang; Kelly Smart; Daniel Tatone; Aditi Kalia; Daniel Digiacomo; James L Kennedy Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Sarah A Morrow; Audrey Smerbeck; Kara Patrick; Diane Cookfair; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Ralph H B Benedict Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-09-23 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Leah G Mann; Kaitlyn R Hay; Alexander K Song; Steven P Errington; Paula Trujillo; David H Zald; Yan Yan; Hakmook Kang; Gordon D Logan; Daniel O Claassen Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 6.709
Authors: K P C Kuypers; E B de Sousa Fernandes Perna; P C Dolder; S W Toennes; E L Theunissen; N L Mason; N R P W Hutten; J G Ramaekers Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Friederike Holze; Patrick Vizeli; Felix Müller; Laura Ley; Raoul Duerig; Nimmy Varghese; Anne Eckert; Stefan Borgwardt; Matthias E Liechti Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2019-11-16 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Elizabeth Schneider; Elizabeth Martin; Pia Rotshtein; Kasim L Qureshi; Samuel R Chamberlain; Maartje S Spetter; Colin T Dourish; Suzanne Higgs Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 6.222