Literature DB >> 25832122

The role of stop-signal probability and expectation in proactive inhibition.

Matthijs Vink1, Reinoud Kaldewaij, Bram B Zandbelt, Pascal Pas, Stefan du Plessis.   

Abstract

The subjective belief of what will happen plays an important role across many cognitive domains, including response inhibition. However, tasks that study inhibition do not distinguish between the processing of objective contextual cues indicating stop-signal probability and the subjective expectation that a stop-signal will or will not occur. Here we investigated the effects of stop-signal probability and the expectation of a stop-signal on proactive inhibition. Twenty participants performed a modified stop-signal anticipation task while being scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging. At the beginning of each trial, the stop-signal probability was indicated by a cue (0% or > 0%), and participants had to indicate whether they expected a stop-signal to occur (yes/no/don't know). Participants slowed down responding on trials with a > 0% stop-signal probability, but this proactive response slowing was even greater when they expected a stop-signal to occur. Analyses were performed in brain regions previously associated with proactive inhibition. Activation in the striatum, supplementary motor area and left dorsal premotor cortex during the cue period was increased when participants expected a stop-signal to occur. In contrast, activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus and right inferior parietal cortex activity during the stimulus-response period was related to the processing of contextual cues signalling objective stop-signal probability, regardless of expectation. These data show that proactive inhibition depends on both the processing of objective contextual task information and the subjective expectation of stop-signals.
© 2015 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expectation; human; proactive inhibition; right inferior frontal gyrus; striatum; supplementary motor area

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25832122     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  20 in total

1.  β-Bursts Reveal the Trial-to-Trial Dynamics of Movement Initiation and Cancellation.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sensitivity to perception level differentiates two subnetworks within the mirror neuron system.

Authors:  Shiri Simon; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Evidence for non-selective response inhibition in uncertain contexts revealed by combined meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Ruslan Masharipov; Alexander Korotkov; Svyatoslav Medvedev; Maxim Kireev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Stopping Interference in Response Inhibition: Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Selective Stopping.

Authors:  Corey G Wadsley; John Cirillo; Arne Nieuwenhuys; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  DRD2 Schizophrenia-Risk Allele Is Associated With Impaired Striatal Functioning in Unaffected Siblings of Schizophrenia Patients.

Authors:  Matthijs Vink; Max de Leeuw; Jurjen J Luykx; Kristel R van Eijk; Hanna E van den Munkhof; Mariët van Buuren; René S Kahn
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  A dual but asymmetric role of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in response inhibition and switching from a non-salient to salient action.

Authors:  Peter Manza; Sien Hu; Herta H Chao; Sheng Zhang; Hoi-Chung Leung; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The Role of Conjunctive Representations in Stopping Actions.

Authors:  Atsushi Kikumoto; Tesufuaishin Sameshima; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-02-02

Review 8.  Neural and behavioral mechanisms of proactive and reactive inhibition.

Authors:  Heidi C Meyer; David J Bucci
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Steady-state and dynamic network modes for perceptual expectation.

Authors:  Uk-Su Choi; Yul-Wan Sung; Seiji Ogawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Temporal Dynamics of Proactive and Reactive Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Matthias Liebrand; Inga Pein; Elinor Tzvi; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.