| Literature DB >> 25830331 |
Chao Teng1, Zhengfu Zhou1, István Molnár2, Xinna Li1, Ran Tang1, Ming Chen1, Lin Wang3, Shiyou Su1, Wei Zhang1, Min Lin1.
Abstract
A novel Gram-negative bacterium, designated ZWT, was isolated from a soil sample of the Western Desert of China, and its phenotypic properties and phylogenetic position were investigated using a polyphasic approach. Growth occurred on TGY medium at 5-42°C with an optimum of 30°C, and at pH 7.0-11.0 with an optimum of pH 9.0. The predominant cellular fatty acids were summed feature 3 (C16:1ω7c/C16:1ω6c or C16:1ω6c/C16:1ω7c) (39.22%), iso-C15:0 (27.91%), iso-C17:0 3OH (15.21%), C16:0 (4.98%), iso-C15:0 3OH (3.03%), C16:0 3OH (5.39%) and C14:0 (1.74%). The major polar lipid of strain ZWT is phosphatidylethanolamine. The only menaquinone observed was MK-7. The GC content of the DNA of strain ZWT is 44.9 mol%. rDNA phylogeny, genome relatedness and chemotaxonomic characteristics all indicate that strain ZWT represents a novel species of the genus Sphingobacterium. We propose the name S. deserti sp. nov., with ZWT (= KCTC 32092T = ACCC 05744T) as the type strain. Whole genome optical mapping and next-generation sequencing was used to derive a finished genome sequence for strain ZWT, consisting of a circular chromosome of 4,615,818 bp in size. The genome of strain ZWT features 3,391 protein-encoding and 48 tRNA-encoding genes. Comparison of the predicted proteome of ZWT with those of other sphingobacteria identified 925 species-unique proteins that may contribute to the adaptation of ZWT to its native, extremely arid and inhospitable environment. As the first finished genome sequence for any Sphingobacterium, our work will serve as a useful reference for subsequent sequencing and mapping efforts for additional strains and species within this genus.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25830331 PMCID: PMC4382152 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Electron micrograph of the cell morphology of strain ZWT.
Differential phenotypic characteristics of strain ZWT and closely related Sphingobacterium species.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5–42 | 10–42 | 10–40 | 10–42 | 10–40 | 10–40 | 11–39 | 10–42 | 15–42 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| + | - | + | + | ND | - | - | - | - |
|
| |||||||||
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | ND | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - | ND | + | - | - | ND |
|
| - | + | + | - | + | - | + | ND | ND |
|
| |||||||||
|
| - | + | + | - | - | - | + | ND | ND |
|
| + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| + | + | - | + | + | - | + | - | - |
|
| - | + | + | - | + | + | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 44.85 | 42.3 | 39.0 | 44.2 | 40.2 | 40.6 | 41.0 | 38.7 | 36.6 |
Strains: 1, Sphingobacterium deserti sp. nov. ZWT; 2, S. composti 4M24T (data from this study); 3, S. spiritivorum JCM 1277T (data from this study); 4, S. arenae H-12T (data from this study); 5, S. shayense HS39T [30]; 6, S. nematocida M-SX103T [31]; 7, S. bambusae IBFC2009T [32]; 8, S. daejeonense TR6-04T [33]; 9, S. kyonggiense KEMC 2241-005T [34]. +, Positive;-, negative; ND, no data available.
Fatty acid composition of strain ZWT and related members of the genus Sphingobacterium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.7 | - | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2.0 | - | 1.2 |
|
| 5.0 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 7.3 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
|
| 5.4 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 15.2 | - | 6.7 |
|
| 27.9 | 29.5 | 30.1 | 27.2 | 28.6 | 33.3 | 22.4 | 45.6 | 27.8 |
|
| 3.0 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
|
| 15.2 | 19.7 | 12.5 | 15.4 | 13.5 | 13.4 | 12.8 | 16.6 | 12.5 |
|
| 39.2 | 37.5 | 42.7 | 37.8 | 37.0 | 35.0 | 34.4 | - | 29.6 |
Strains: 1, Sphingobacterium deserti sp. nov. ZWT; 2, S. composti 4M24T (data from this study); 3, S. spiritivorum JCM 1277T (data from this study); 4, S. arenae H-12T (data from this study); 5, S. shayense HS39T [30]; 6, S. nematocida M-SX103T [31]; 7, S. bambusae IBFC2009T [32]; 8, S. daejeonense TR6-04T [33]; 9, S. kyonggiense KEMC 2241-005T [34]. Numbers represent percentages of the total fatty acids.–, not detected (<1%). Summed feature 3: C16:1ω7c / C16:1ω6c, or C16:1ω6c / C16:1ω7c.
Fig 2Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree indicating the relationships between the strain ZWT and other Sphingobacterium spp.
Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1,000 replications) of > 70% are shown at branch points. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Fig 3Optical mapping of the Sphingobacterium deserti sp. nov. ZWT genomic DNA with BamHI.
The large chromosome restriction map was generated by shotgun optical mapping. The outer circle depicts the consensus map; the inner circles indicate the contigs from which the consensus map was generated. Colors are arbitrarily assigned to homologous overlapping fragments.
Fig 4Genome map of Sphingobacterium deserti sp. nov. ZWT.
Concentric tracks from the inside to the outside represent the GC nucleotide bias; the GC content; tRNA and rRNA genes on the reverse strand; tRNA and rRNA genes on the forward-strand; reverse-strand coding sequences (CDSs); and forward-strand CDSs.
Fig 5Whole-genome optical mapping barcode of Sphingobacterium deserti sp. nov. ZWT.
Vertical lines represent restriction sites; distances between lines represent fragment sizes.
Fig 6Venn diagram depicting orthologous groups of predicted proteins encoded in four sphingobacterial genomes.
C1: Sphingobacterium spiritivorum ATCC 33300; C2: Sphingobacterium paucimobilis HER1398; C3: Sphingobacterium thalpophilum DSM11723; and C4: Sphingobacterium deserti ZWT.
Genome features of S. deserti ZWT and comparison with S. spiritivorum ATCC 33300.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 4,615,818 | 5,232,948 |
|
| 42.6 | 39.9 |
|
| 3,391 | 4,925 |
|
| 48 | 44 |
|
| 2,501 | 2,824 |
|
| 11 | 9 |
|
| 84 | - |
|
| 795 | 2,092 |
CDS, coding sequences.