| Literature DB >> 25830291 |
Jian Gang Duan1, Xiang Yan Chen2, Li Wang2, Alex Lau2, Adrian Wong3, G Neil Thomas4, Brian Tomlinson2, Roxanna Liu2, Juliana C N Chan2, Thomas W Leung2, Vincent Mok2, Ka Sing Wong2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at higher risk of poor outcome than are non-diabetic patients with ACS. Few studies have focused on sex-related ACS incidence, ACS-related mortality or risk factors to affects sex specific ACS in Chinese with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Based on a hospital-based cohort of Chinese patients with T2DM, we aimed to investigate whether there was sex difference in ACS or ACS-related mortality or risk factors of ACS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25830291 PMCID: PMC4382276 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Comparisons of basic characteristics and risk factors between men and women in a cohort of Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes.
| Characteristic | All (N = 2135) | Men (n = 876) | Women (n = 1259) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 55.18±11.31 | 54.61±11.24 | 55.59±11.35 | 0.048 |
|
| 138.18±21.44 | 136.07±20.64 | 139.65±21.86 | <0.001 |
|
| 78.86±11.34 | 79.75±11.49 | 78.24±11.20 | 0.003 |
|
| 5.62±1.11 | 5.48±1.13 | 5.71±1.10 | <0.001 |
|
| 1.78±1.64 | 1.81±1.61 | 1.76±1.66 | 0.488 |
|
| 3.59±0.92 | 3.55±0.88 | 3.61±0.94 | 0.191 |
|
| 1.26±0.36 | 1.16±0.31 | 1.34±0.38 | <0.001 |
|
| 7.85±1.87 | 7.91±1.90 | 7.80±1.84 | 0.191 |
|
| ||||
|
| 575 (26.9) | 493 (56.3) | 82 (6.5) | <0.001 |
|
| 80.71±72.79 | 71.80±67.86 | 86.90±75.45 | <0.001 |
|
| 624 (29.2) | 276 (32.5) | 348 (28.4) | 0.047 |
|
| 42 (2.0) | 17 (2.0) | 25 (2.0) | 0.993 |
|
| 484 (22.7) | 201 (22.9) | 283 (22.5) | 0.815 |
|
| 256 (12) | 98 (11.2) | 158 (12.5) | 0.340 |
|
| ||||
|
| 1846 (86.5) | 770 (88.0) | 1076 (85.7) | 0.120 |
|
| 250 (11.7) | 103 (11.8) | 147 (11.7) | 0.962 |
|
| 15 (0.7) | 6 (0.7) | 9 (0.7) | 0.933 |
|
| 94(4.4) | 36(4.1) | 58(4.6) | 0.578 |
Values are expressed as the mean ±SD or n (%).
Note: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; PAD, peripheral artery disease; MCA, middle cerebral artery; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Fig 1ACS incidence per 1000 person-years among men and women with in different age categories.
ACS incidence generally increased with age among (A) 876 men and (B) 1259 women. Descriptive analyses are displayed with best-fit curves defined by the polynomial equations (A) y = 0.4568x2 -1.0512x +11.96 (R2 = 0.9074) and (B) y = 0.2867x2 + 0.1611x + 2.8626 (R2 = 0.9261).
Each-year and each-5-year incidence (%) of acute coronary syndrome among Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes, stratified by sex and age from 35 years old.
| Age range, yr | Each-year incidence (%) | Each-5-year incidence (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Men | Women | |
|
| 0.90 | 0.50 | 5.25 | 2.25 |
|
| 1.61 | 0.44 | 7.50 | 2.00 |
|
| 1.33 | 0.67 | 7.25 | 2.75 |
|
| 1.44 | 0.56 | 6.5 | 3 |
|
| 2.33 | 0.78 | 11.50 | 3.75 |
|
| 1.56 | 1.83 | 7.50 | 7.25 |
|
| 2.06 | 1.89 | 9.00 | 8.75 |
|
| 3.78 | 3.44 | 16.00 | 12.75 |
|
| 3.94 | 2.22 | 16.25 | 9.75 |
Fig 2Survival plots of examining the association between sex and occurrence of ACS.
The continuous line depicts data for 204 men; the dashed line depicts data for 210 women. Cumulative occurrences of ACS were higher among men than women over time (log rank Χ2 = 20.32, P<0.001).
Fig 3Kaplan-Meier survival curve for ACS-related death in 414 Chinese type 2 diabetic subjects with ACS.
The continuous line depicts data for 51 men; the dashed line depicts data for 53 women. No significant differences exist between ACS-related mortalities in men and women (log rank Χ2 = 0.063, P = 0.802).
Cox proportional hazard regression models to identify predictors of acute coronary syndrome among Chinese men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus after adjusting for different confounders.
| Variable | All | Men | Women | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1.774 | 1.418–2.218 | <0.001 | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ |
|
| 1.029 | 1.018–1.041 | <0.001 | 1.022 | 1.006–1.038 | 0.006 | 1.047 | 1.029–1.065 | <0.001 |
|
| 1.269 | 0.969–1.661 | 0.083 | 1.067 | 0.768–1.482 | 0.698 | 1.895 | 1.163–3.087 | 0.01 |
|
| 1.004 | 1.002–1.005 | <0.001 | 1.004 | 1.002–1.006 | <0.001 | 1.001 | 0.999–1.003 | 0.285 |
|
| 1.007 | 1.002–1.013 | 0.007 | 1.003 | 0.994–1.012 | 0.533 | 1.009 | 1.002–1.017 | 0.015 |
|
| 4.181 | 2.611–6.694 | <0.001 | 1.916 | 0.766–4.793 | 0.165 | 9.789 | 5.299–18.082 | <0.001 |
|
| 1.214 | 0.942–1.565 | 0.134 | 1.264 | 0.845–1.890 | 0.254 | 1.391 | 0.958–2.019 | 0.083 |
|
| 1.163 | 0.868–1.558 | 0.313 | 1.064 | 0.624–1.816 | 0.819 | 1.541 | 0.988–2.404 | 0.057 |
|
| 1.295 | 1.165–1.440 | <0.001 | 1.046 | 0.639–1.712 | 0.858 | 1.09 | 0.929–1.279 | 0.288 |
|
| 0.953 | 0.685–1.326 | 0.775 | 1.541 | 1.285–1.849 | <0.001 | 0.9 | 0.541–1.496 | 0.685 |
|
| 0.559 | 0.396–0.790 | 0.001 | 0.483 | 0.269–0.867 | 0.015 | 0.801 | 0.492–1.305 | 0.373 |
|
| 1.029 | 0.970–1.091 | 0.343 | 0.965 | 0.677–1.377 | 0.846 | 1.715 | 1.172–2.511 | 0.006 |
|
| 1.619 | 1.289–2.034 | <0.001 | 1.731 | 1.235–2.427 | 0.001 | 1.993 | 1.407–2.824 | <0.001 |
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; PAD, peripheral artery disease; MCA, middle cerebral artery; TC, total cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.