| Literature DB >> 25830105 |
Rebecca K Davidson1, Tina Ličina2, Lucrezia Gorini2, Jos M Milner3.
Abstract
Many health surveillance programs for wild cervids do not include routine parasite screening despite evidence that gastrointestinal parasites can affect wildlife population dynamics by influencing host fecundity and survival. Slaughter weights of moose in some regions of Norway have been decreasing over recent decades but any role of parasites has not yet been considered. We investigated parasite faunal diversity of moose in Hedmark, SE Norway, by faecal analysis and identification of adult abomasal and caecal nematodes during the autumn hunting season. We related parasite prevalence and abundance to estimates of body condition, gender and age. We identified 11 parasite groups. Moose had high abomasal gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) burdens and all individuals were infected. Ostertagia antipini and Spiculopteragia alcis were the most prevalent abomasal GINs identified. O. leptospicularis and Telodorsagia circumcincta were also identified in the abomasa while a range of other GIN and Moniezia sp. eggs, and coccidia, Dictyocaulus sp. and Protostrongylid larvae were found in faeces. Female moose had higher mean abomasal nematode counts than males, particularly among adults. However, adult males had higher faecal egg counts than adult females which may reflect reduction in faecal volume with concentration of eggs among males during the rut. We found no strong evidence for the development of acquired immunity to abomasal nematodes with age, although there was a higher Protostrongylid and Moniezia infection prevalence in younger animals. High burdens of several parasites were associated with poor body condition in terms of slaughter weight relative to skeletal size but unrelated to visually evaluated fat reserves. Given findings from earlier experimental studies, our results imply sub-clinical effects of GI parasite infection on host condition. Managers should be aware that autumn faecal egg counts and field assessments of fat reserves may not be reliable indicators of parasitism and may underestimate impacts on wildlife populations.Entities:
Keywords: Abomasum; Body condition; Cost of parasitism; Deer; Gastrointestinal parasite; Moose
Year: 2015 PMID: 25830105 PMCID: PMC4356740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.12.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
The age and gender distribution of moose investigated for gastrointestinal parasites, faecal egg and larval counts during the 2013 hunting season in Hedmark county, Norway, showing mean dressed carcass weight (mass) as well as fat reserves and body condition index (BCI: population mean = 0, BCI < 0 is below average condition, BCI > 1 is above average condition).
| Age class | Gender | n | Mean mass (kg) [range] | Fat reserves (n = 48) | Mean BCI (n = 43) | Mean age (years) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calf | 5 males | 10 | 69 [50–86] | 10% | 90% | – | −0.049 | <1 |
| Yearling | 7 males | 10 | 131 [106–170] | – | 100% | – | 0.011 | >1, |
| Adult | Male | 17 | 198 [160–277] | – | 82% | 18% | 0.019 | 4.3 |
| Adult | Female | 12 | 167 [137–188] | – | 67% | 33% | −0.002 | 6.6 |
Counts and prevalence of adult abomasal nematodes of the genera Ostertagia, Spiculopteragia and Telodorsagia found in moose in Hedmark, classified by age/gender class from a subset of 30 moose from the overall study population.
| Age group | n | Abomasal counts | Prevalence (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Median | Max | ||||||
| Calf | ||||||||
| Male | 5 – 5 | 260 | 980 | 4,220 | 40 [10–82] | 100 [59–100] | 60 [18–90] | 0 [0–41] |
| Female | 5 – 4 | 60 | 290 | 1,720 | 25 [0–81] | 75 [19–99] | 25 [0–81] | 0 [0–60] |
| Yearling | ||||||||
| Male | 7 – 7 | 1320 | 5,400 | 11,920 | 0 [0–41] | 86 [42–100] | 100 [59–100] | 0 [0–41] |
| Female | 3 – 3 | 1980 | 3,140 | 4,300 | 0 [0–71] | 100 [29–100] | 67 [10–99] | 0 [0–71] |
| Adult | ||||||||
| Male | 17 – 3 | 1700 | 7,200 | 9,520 | 100 [29–100] | 33 [0–91] | 100 [29–100] | 0 [0–71] |
| Female | 12 – 8 | 8280 | 27,730 | 56,000 | 38 [9–76] | 100 [63–100] | 100 [63–100] | 13 [0–53] |
| Total | 49 – 30 | 60 | 6,720 | 56,000 | 30 [14.7–49.4] | 86.7 [65.3–94.4] | 80 [54.1–87.7] | 3.3 [0–17.2] |
| No. infected/uninfected hosts | 9/21 | 25/5 | 22/8 | 1/29 | ||||
Sample size for abomasal counts – sample size for abomasal nematode species prevalence.
95% confidence interval for the prevalence.
Fig. 1Histogram of number of parasite groups (parasite diversity) found in individual moose (n = 30) shot during the licensed hunting season, autumn 2013, in Hedmark county, Norway.
The prevalence (%) of parasite eggs and larvae based on McMaster and Baermann faecal examinations of moose shot during the licensed hunting season, 2013, in Hedmark county. The 95% confidence interval of the prevalence is given in square brackets.
| Age class | Strongyle-type | DSL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eggs | Eggs | Eggs | Eggs | Eggs | Eggs | Larvae | Larvae | |
| Calf | 7 | 3/9 | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/9 | 7/9 | 1/9 | 6/9 |
| 44.4% | 33.3% | 22.2% | 77.8% | 11.1% | 66.7% | |||
| [19–73%] | [12–65%] | [0–30%] | [0–30%] | [6–55%] | [45–94%] | [20–44%] | [35–88%] | |
| Yearling | 6/10 | 1/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 3/10 | 0/10 | 2/8 | 2/8 |
| 60.0% | 10.0% | 30.0% | 25.0% | 25.0% | ||||
| [31–83%] | [2–40%] | [0–28%] | [0–28%] | [11–60%] | [0–28%] | [7–59%] | [7–59%] | |
| Adult | 19/26 | 5/26 | 1/26 | 1/26 | 4/26 | 0/26 | 0/26 | 1/24 |
| 73.1% | 19.2% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 15.4% | 4.2% | |||
| [54–86%] | [9–38%] | [1–19%] | [1–19%] | [6–34%] | [0–13%] | [0–14%] | [7–20%] | |
| Total | 29/45 | 9/45 | 1/45 | 1/45 | 9/45 | 7/45 | 3/41 | 9/41 |
| 64.4% | 20.0% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 20.0% | 15.6% | 7.3% | 22.0% |
No. positive cases.
No. examined.
Fig. 2The correlation between the number of adult female nematodes counted in the abomasa and the Strongyle-type EPG of faeces in moose (n = 45) shot during the licensed hunting season, autumn 2013, in Hedmark county, Norway. Note that 1 extreme outlier with a count of 1716 EPG has not been plotted.
Summary of the significant factors affecting parasite abundance and host probability of infection in a Norwegian moose population, determined by generalised linear models.
BCI – body condition index; Mass – carcass weight (kg); ns – not significant.
Grey cells indicate models were not run due to too few positive hosts (Trichuris sp., Nematodirus sp., Dictyocaulus sp., T. circumcincta), or in the case of adult abomasal nematodes, abundance only being available for all species pooled (probability of infection: 100%).
Direction of effect is given in parentheses (M: males, F: females, C: calves, Y: yearlings, A: adults). Interactions are represented by square brackets.
* p ≤ 0.050.
** p ≤ 0.010.
*** p ≤ 0.001.
a Excluding 1 extreme outlier.
Fig. 4Counts of abomasal nematodes in moose, hunted during the licensed hunting season, autumn 2013, in Hedmark county, Norway, in relation to slaughter weight, gender (F – females [black]; M – males [grey]) and body condition index (poor – BCI < 0 [open circles]; good – BCI > 0 [filled circles]). The lines show model predictions from a quasi-Poisson generalised linear model explaining 72.4% of the deviance. The lines show the model predictions for individuals with BCI equal to 1st and 3rd quartiles.
Fig. 3A box–whisker plot showing the prevalence of infection with protostrongylid larvae (dorsal spine larvae) in moose hunted during the licensed hunting season, autumn 2013, in Hedmark county, Norway, in relation to age. The median (solid black line), quartiles (ends of boxes) with the whiskers indicating the variability outside the quartiles, and extreme outliers, individual points, are shown.