| Literature DB >> 32140405 |
Katarzyna Filip-Hutsch1, Michał Czopowicz2, Magdalena Świsłocka3, Mirosław Ratkiewicz3, Anetta Borkowska3, Rafał Kowalczyk4, Aleksander W Demiaszkiewicz1.
Abstract
The study analyses patterns of endoparasite eggs, oocysts and larvae shedding by moose from the relict population in the Biebrza marshland, NE Poland, which has grown to be one of the largest in Central Europe since the ban on hunting imposed in 2001. The analysis identified 10 species or groups of parasites among 230 faecal moose samples collected over 16 consequent months. The most prevalent were the eggs of Trichostrongylidae, Trichuris spp., Nematodirella alcidis, Parafasciolopsis fasciolaemorpha and the larvae of Elaphostrongylus sp. Four parasite species were more prevalent in males, indicating male-biased parasitism, and the studied moose population exhibited a female-skewed sex ratio. Nematodirella alcidis eggs and Protostrongylid larvae were more prevalent during winter, which indicated their resistance to harsh weather conditions. The prevalence of Eimeria alces and Aonchotheca sp. increased during the growing season, as did the number of eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) of P. fasciolaemorpha, possibly due to the availability of water sources. Higher mean monthly temperature was also found to have a positive effect on the excretion of Trichostrongylidae and Moniezia spp. eggs. In addition, the time of infection and the specificity of the parasite life cycle, being sensitive to certain climatic conditions, also appeared to have a strong influence on eggs, oocysts and larvae shedding in this non-harvested moose population.Entities:
Keywords: Alces alces; Endoparasites; Parasite transmission; Seasonal patterns
Year: 2020 PMID: 32140405 PMCID: PMC7047143 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2020.02.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Prevalence (95% confidence interval) of parasitic infections in moose in the Biebrza marshland with regard to moose males and females.
| Parasite | General (n = 187) | Males (n = 65) | Females (n = 122) | Chi-squared test (p) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n of positive samples | Prevalence (95%CI) | n of positive samples | Prevalence (95%CI) | n of positive samples | Prevalence (95%CI) | ||
| Trichostrongylidae | 180 | 96.3 (92.5–98.2) | 65 | 100 (94.4–100) | 115 | 94.3 (88.6–97.2) | 0.098 |
| 91 | 48.7 (41.6–55.8) | 37 | 56.9 (44.8–68.2) | 54 | 44.3 (35.8–53.1) | 0.099 | |
| 11 | 5.9 (3.3–10.2) | 2 | 3.1 (0.8–10.5) | 9 | 7.4 (3.9–13.4) | 0.388 | |
| 100 | 53.5 (46.3–60.5) | 43 | 66.1 (54.0–76.5) | 57 | 46.7 (38.1–55.5) | 0.011 | |
| 31 | 16.6 (11.9–22.6) | 15 | 23.1 (14.5–34.6) | 16 | 13.1 (8.2–20.2) | 0.081 | |
| 11 | 5.9 (3.3–10.2) | 7 | 10.8 (9.7–27.8) | 4 | 3.3 (1.3–8.1) | 0.038 | |
| 8 | 4.3 (2.2–8.2) | 6 | 9.2 (4.3–18.7) | 2 | 1.6 (0.5–5.8) | 0.022 | |
| 10 | 5.3 (2.9–9.6) | 2 | 3.1 (0.8–10.5) | 8 | 6.6 (3.4–12.4) | 0.505 | |
| 168 | 89.8 (84.7–93.4) | 62 | 95.4 (87.3–98.4) | 106 | 86.9 (79.8–91.8) | 0.067 | |
| 8 | 4.3 (2.2–8.2) | 6 | 9.2 (4.3–18.7) | 2 | 1.6 (0.5–5.8) | 0.022 | |
Prevalence (95% confidence interval) of parasitic infections in moose during the growing and winter seasons.
| Parasite | Growing season (n = 99) | Winter season (n = 100) | Chi-squared test (p) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n of positive samples | Prevalence (95%CI) | n of positive samples | Prevalence (95%CI) | ||
| Trichostrongylidae | 93 | 93.9 (87.4–97.2) | 98 | 98.0 (93.0–99.4) | 0.145 |
| 27 | 27.3 (19.5–36.8) | 67 | 67.0 (57.3–75.4) | <0.001* | |
| 10 | 10.1 (5.6–17.6) | 1 | 1.0 (0.2–5.4) | 0.005* | |
| 48 | 48.5 (38.9–58.2) | 56 | 56.0 (46.2–65.3) | 0.289 | |
| 10 | 10.1 (5.6–17.6) | 22 | 22.0 (15.0–31.1) | 0.022* | |
| 2 | 2.0 (0.6–7.1) | 9 | 9.0 (4.8–16.2) | 0.031* | |
| 4 | 4.0 (1.6–9.9) | 4 | 4.0 (1.6–9.8) | 0.988 | |
| 6 | 6.1 (2.8–12.6) | 3 | 3.0 (1.0–8.5) | 0.299 | |
| 91 | 91.9 (84.9–95.8) | 87 | 87.0 (79.0–92.2) | 0.259 | |
| 7 | 7.1 (3.5–13.9) | 1 | 0.2 (0.2–5.4) | 0.029* | |
Fig. 1The relationship between the prevalence of Nematodirella alcidis and Moniezia spp. eggs and mean monthly temperature (red continuous line). Blue continuous line shows the prevalence and broken lines indicate its 95% confidence interval. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 2The relationship between the EPG of Trichostrongylidae family members, Moniezia spp., Parafasciolopsis fasciolaemorpha, the LPG of Elaphostrongylus sp. and mean monthly temperature (red continuous line). Blue continuous line shows the median EPG/LPG and broken lines indicate its 95% confidence interval. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 3The relationship between the median EPG of Parafasciolopsis fasciolaemorpha, the median LPG of Elaphostrongylus sp. and the presence of snow cover.
Intensity of parasitic infections in moose during the growing and winter seasons.
| Parasite | n of positive samples | Growing season | n of positive samples | Winter season | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median, IQR (range) | Median, IQR (range) | ||||
| Trichostrongylidae | 93 | 16, 5–81 (1–382) | 98 | 13, 6–42 (1–426) | 0.471 |
| 27 | 1, 1–4 (1–5) | 67 | 2, 1–5 (1–21) | 0.161 | |
| 10 | 0, 0-0 (0–2) | 1 | – | - | |
| 48 | 7, 2–34 (1–454) | 56 | 13, 2–61 (1–386) | 0.289 | |
| 10 | 2, 1–5 (1–12) | 22 | 4, 1–64 (1–134) | 0.171 | |
| 2 | 1, 4 | 9 | 2, 1–4 (1–6) | - | |
| 4 | 2 (1–5) | 4 | 2 (1–4) | >0.999 | |
| 6 | 66, 27–244 (9–388) | 3 | 7 (2–33) | 0.093 | |
| 91 | 12, 2–22 (1–181) | 87 | 5, 2–10 (1–62) | 0.001* | |
| 7 | 1, 1–28 (1–56) | 1 | 1 | - |
IQR-interquartile range.
Mann-Whitney U test.
Not tested.