| Literature DB >> 25829852 |
Jan Klimaszewski1, Reginald P Webster2, Caroline Bourdon1, Georges Pelletier1, Benoit Godin3, David W Langor4.
Abstract
Six species of the genus Mocyta Mulsant & Rey are reported from Canada: Mocytaamblystegii (Brundin), Mocytabreviuscula (Mäklin), Mocytadiscreta (Casey), Mocytafungi (Gravenhorst), Mocytaluteola (Erichson), and Mocytasphagnorum Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n. New provincial and state records include: Mocytabreviuscula - Saskatchewan and Oregon; Mocytadiscreta - Quebec, Ontario and Saskatchewan; Mocytaluteola - New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario, Massachusetts and Minnesota; and Mocytafungi - Saskatchewan. Mocytasphagnorum is described from eastern Canada from specimens captured in Newfoundland, New Brunswick, Quebec and Ontario. Mocytanegligens Mulsant and Rey, a native European species suspected of occurring in Canada, is excluded from the Nearctic fauna based on comparison of European types with similarly coloured Canadian specimens, which are now identified as Mocytaluteola. The European species, Mocytagilvicollis (Scheerpeltz), is synonymized with another European nominal species, Mocytanegligens, based on examination of type material of the two species. Lectotypes are designated for Eurypronotadiscreta Casey, Athetagilvicollis Scheerpeltz, Homalotaluteola Erichson, Colpodotanegligens Mulsant and Rey, Acrotonaprudens Casey and Dolosotaredundans Casey. The latter species is here synonymized with Mocytaluteola. A review of the six Nearctic species is provided, including keys to species and closely related genera, colour habitus images, images of genitalia, biological information and maps of their distributions in Canada.Entities:
Keywords: Aleocharinae; Canada; Coleoptera; Mocyta; Staphylinidae; taxonomy
Year: 2015 PMID: 25829852 PMCID: PMC4366688 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.487.9151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Figures 3a–j.(Casey): 3a habitus in dorsal view 3b, c median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 3d median lobe of aedeagus in dorsal view 3e male tergite VIII 3f male sternite VIII 3g–h spermatheca 3i female tergite VIII 3j female sternite VIII. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm, and the remaining scale bars = 0.2 mm.
Figures 7a–g.(Casey): 7a habitus in dorsal view 7b median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 7c male tergite VIII 7d male sternite VIII 7e spermatheca 7f female tergite VIII 7g female sternite VIII. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm, and the remaining scale bars = 0.2 mm.
Figures 6a–i.(Erichson): 6a habitus in dorsal view 6b median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 6c male tergite VIII 6d male sternite VIII 6e–g spermatheca 6h female tergite VIII 6i female sternite VIII. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm, and the remaining scale bars = 0.2 mm.
Figures 4a–h.(Brundin): 4a habitus in dorsal view 4b median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 4c median lobe of aedeagus in dorsal view 4d male tergite VIII 4e male sternite VIII 4f spermatheca in lateral view 4g female tergite VIII 4h female sternite VIII. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm, and the remaining scale bars = 0.2 mm.
Figures 5a–j.(Gravenhorst): 5a habitus in dorsal view 5b median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 5c median lobe of aedeagus in ventral view 5d–h spermatheca 5i female tergite VIII 5j female sternite VIII. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm, and the remaining scale bars = 0.2 mm.
Figures 2a–h.(Bernhauer): 2a habitus in dorsal view 2b median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 2c median lobe of aedeagus in dorsal view 2d male tergite VIII 2e male sternite VIII 2f spermatheca 2g female tergite VIII 2h female sternite VIII. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm, and the remaining scale bars = 0.2 mm.
Figures 1a–h.(Erichson): 1a habitus in dorsal view 1b median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 1c median lobe of aedeagus in ventral view 1d male tergite VIII 1e male sternite VIII 1f spermatheca 1g female tergite VIII 1h female sternite VIII. Figures 1b–h after Gusarov 2003, slightly modified. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm, and the remaining scale bars = 0.2 mm.
Maps 1–3.1 Distribution of (Casey) in Canada 2 Distribution of in Canada 3 Distribution of in Canada.
Figures 9a–g.(Scheerpeltz) [images based on Types, Austria] (=): 9a habitus in dorsal view 9b median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 9c male tergite VIII 9d male sternite VIII 9e spermatheca in lateral view 9f female tergite VIII 9g female sternite VIII. Broken line indicates original border of bulbus which was distorted during preparations. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm, and the remaining scale bars = 0.2 mm.
Figures 10–14.Mulsant & Rey (=) [habitus images in dorsal view, based on types, France]: 10 lectotype 11 paralectotype 1 12 paralectotype 2 13 paralectotype 3 14 paralectotype 4 [abdomen]. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm.
Figures 8a–h.sp. n.: 8a male habitus in dorsal view 8b median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 8c male tergite VIII 8d male sternite VIII 8e female habitus in dorsal view 8f spermatheca 8g female tergite VIII 8h female sternite VIII. Scale bar for habitus = 1 mm, and the remaining scale bars = 0.2 mm.
| 1 | Antennae thick, articles V-X more or less transverse (Fig. | |
| – | Antennae in most specimens thin, articles V-X subquadrate or slightly transverse (Figs | |
| 2 | Antennae very thin and pale, in most specimens contrasting in colour with head, articles V-X subquadrate, transverse to slightly elongate (Figs 3a–8a, e); pronotum broad and shield-shaped, often broader than maximum width of elytra, pubescence moderately dense and directed straight posteriad or obliquely posterolaterad from midline of disc (Figs | |
| – | Antennae normally developed and not appearing very thin, usually not strongly contrasting in colour with head (Fig. |
| 1 | Body bicoloured, head and at least posterior part of abdomen brown to almost black, and remainder of the body reddish to yellowish-brown, pronotum in most specimens paler than the rest of the body, in some specimens elytra mottled with small and irregular in shape darker spots (Figs | |
| – | Body uniformly brown to black except for paler appendages in most specimens | |
| 2 | Pronotum approximately as broad as elytra (Fig. | |
| – | Pronotum much broader than elytra (Fig. | |
| 3 | Elytra distinctly longer than pronotum (Figs | 4 |
| – | Elytra as long as or slightly shorter than pronotum (Figs | 5 |
| 4 | Pronotum approximately rectangular in shape, gradually narrowed in apical third of its length (Fig. | |
| – | Pronotum approximately trapezoidal in shape, strongly narrowed apically from basal third of its length (Fig. | |
| 5 | Pronotum as broad as elytra (Fig. | |
| – | Pronotum in many specimens broader than elytra (Fig. |