Literature DB >> 25829449

The glenoid component in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Daphne Pinkas, Brett Wiater, J Michael Wiater.   

Abstract

Ideal management of the glenoid in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty remains controversial. Glenoid component loosening remains a common source of clinical concern and, in young, active patients, implantation of a glenoid prosthesis is often avoided. Efforts to decrease glenoid loosening have resulted in changes to prosthetic design and implantation techniques. Currently, a wide variety of glenoid component options are available, including metal-backed or all-polyethylene, bone ingrowth or ongrowth, inset, and augmented designs. Additionally, several alternatives are available for the young, active patient, including hemiarthroplasty, nonprosthetic resurfacing, and tissue interposition. Many recent clinical and biomechanical studies have examined these implant options. A thorough knowledge of glenoid anatomy, pathology, implant options, indications, and principles of implantation is necessary to optimize the outcome following anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Copyright 2015 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25829449     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-13-00208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  9 in total

1.  CORR Insights(®): no differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.

Authors:  Bernhard Jost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Stability of two versus three peripheral pegs of the glenoid component in modern total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eugene F Stautberg; Daniel C Jupiter; Arsalan Amin; Ali A Qadeer; Omer A Ilahi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Glenoid bony morphology of osteoarthritis prior to shoulder arthroplasty: what the surgeon wants to know and why.

Authors:  Lawrence Lo; Scott Koenig; Natalie L Leong; Brian B Shiu; S Ashfaq Hasan; Mohit N Gilotra; Kenneth C Wang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Radiographic and clinical outcomes of second generation Trabecular Metal™ glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raymond E Chen; Alexander M Brown; Alexander S Greenstein; Sandeep Mannava; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-03-24

5.  Porous metals and alternate bearing surfaces in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shannon R Carpenter; Ivan Urits; Anand M Murthi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 6.  Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Lazaros Kostretzis; Angelos Trellopoulos; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 7.  A comparison of pegged vs. keeled glenoid components regarding functional and radiographic outcomes in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur Welsher; Chetan Gohal; Kim Madden; Bruce Miller; Asheesh Bedi; Bashar Alolabi; Moin Khan
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-07-11

8.  Another Glenoid Measurements for Shoulder Surgery.

Authors:  Yeon-Seok Jeong; Jae-Kwang Yum; Jun-Seok Lee
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2018-12-01

9.  Extra-short humeral heads reduce glenohumeral joint overstuffing compared with short heads in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph G Monir; Kevin A Hao; Dilhan Abeyewardene; Kevin J O'Keefe; Joseph J King; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.